Donald Trump Wants a $5 Billion Premium for Confessing His Weaponization Claims Are Bullshit

Yesterday, Karoline Leavitt excused Trump’s demands for prosecutions of his adversaries by claiming poor Donald Trump was targeted by … Joe Biden:

The President is fulfilling his promise to restore a Department of Justice that demands accountability. And it is not weaponizing the Department of Justice to demand accountability for those who weaponized the Department of Justice. And nobody knows what that looks like more than President Trump. We are not going to tolerate gaslighting from anyone in the media or from anyone on the other side, who is trying to say that it’s the President who is weaponizing the DOJ. It was Joe Biden and his Attorney General who weaponized the DOJ. Joe Biden used this sacred American institution to go after his political opponent in the middle of an election year. And you look at people like Adam Schiff and like James Comey and like Leticia James who the President is rightfully frustrated. He wants accountability for these corrupt fraudsters who abused their power who abused their oath of office, to target the former President and then candidate for the highest office in the land. And I think the President is reaffirmed in those frustrations and his hope for accountability by the millions and millions of people who reelected him to this office with a mandate to demand accountability. And the President has not been shy about this, Gabe. In fact when he traveled to the Department of Justice earlier this year — all of you were there to cover it — he said, quote, I demand a full and complete accountability for wrongs and abuses that have occurred, the American people gave a mandate to investigate and root the corruption out of our system and that’s what the President wants to see done.

Trump’s claims of grievance are really interesting given that he just confessed none of this is justified.

The confession comes in Trump’s recently dismissed lawsuit against the NYT (he has said he’ll refile it within the 28 deadline that Judge Steven Merryday set).

Trump sued about one book and three articles:

  • Russ Buettner and Susanne Craig’s book, Lucky Loser, about how Trump doesn’t have the talent his corrupt father had. (The book just came out in paperback in the US, which surely explains the timing of the lawsuit.)
  • This story, based on the book, describing how much work the Apprentice had to do to make Trump look like a successful businessman.
  • This story repeating John Kelly’s warnings that Trump would rule as a dictator.
  • This article from Peter Baker summarizing Trump’s lifetime of corruption.

As I noted last year when Trump first threatened to file this lawsuit, “The [Baker] story was remarkable e[s]pecially by Baker’s terms — he has a history of pulling his punches with Presidents.” One premise of the story is that, “Trump makes a point of not admitting misdeeds or mistakes.” It catalogued many of them:

  • His multiple business failures
  • His affairs with Karen McDougal and Stormy Daniels
  • His adverse civil judgement in the E Jean Carroll case
  • How little he paid in taxes
  • How much money his Dad gave him
  • The number of “contractors, bankers, business partners, customers and competitors” he stiffed
  • Trump Organization’s tax fraud
  • That “Mr. Mueller concluded that the Russians did interfere on Mr. Trump’s behalf”
  • The 10 instances Mueller laid out where trump may have committed obstruction
  • The ways in which he monetized the presidency
  • The way in which Trump extorted Zelenskyy “to deliver dirt on Mr. Biden, a political rival”
  • His abuse of pardons, including ” figures who he might have had reason to fear would turn against him by talking with prosecutors”
  • “His concerted effort to overturn the 2020 election that he lost so that he could hold onto power despite the will of the voters”
  • That Trump refused to give back the classified documents he took when he left

A whole section of the story focuses on the way in which Trump weaponized government against his adversaries.

Time and again, he publicly pressed his attorneys general — first Jeff Sessions and then William P. Barr — to prosecute Democrats or government officials who angered him. At various times, he called for the prosecution of Mr. Biden, Ms. Clinton and former President Barack Obama and lashed out when advisers resisted.

He grew particularly obsessed with prosecuting certain people, like former Secretary of State John Kerry.

[snip]

Angered that Mr. Bolton had criticized him, Mr. Trump pressured the Justice Department to block his former aide from publishing his book.

[snip]

Mr. Trump tried to put so many people who irritated him in the cross hairs of the legal system that it is hard to maintain a thorough list. He wanted prosecutors to investigate Mr. Comey as well as Andrew G. McCabe, his acting successor, and other F.B.I. officials who participated in the Russia investigation, including Peter Strzok and Lisa Page.

[snip]

He also sought to use his power to help specific companies he favored and penalize those that angered him. He told aides to instruct the Justice Department to block the merger of Time Warner with AT&T, which would include the CNN network, one of the biggest thorns in his side.

But none of that is in the lawsuit. The only three things in the story that Trump claims are defamation in the lawsuit are:

  • A reference to Trump borrowing a Military Academy friend’s jacket, laden with medals, to wear in his yearbook photo
  • Mary Trump’s claim that Trump cheated on his SATs
  • A description that Trump was investigated for mafia ties and serving as a money laundering vehicle

That’s it!!!

Effectively, in a 80-page rant, Trump offered no hint that any of the rest of those things, including Baker’s description of how Trump himself weaponized DOJ and government against his adversaries, were untrue.

This is a point NYT attorney David McCraw made last year when telling Trump to get stuffed.

Tellingly, your letter does not dispute – nor could it – the remainder of the article and its lengthy recitation of the legal problems, financial failures, and misdeeds of Mr. Trump.

Between last year’s threatened lawsuit and when Trump filed just over a week ago, Trump upped his ante. Last year, he claimed these stories had done $10 billion in damage to his fragile reputation. Last week, he demanded $15 billion. (Last year, he claimed his personal brand was worth just $15 billion, whereas last week, he claimed it was worth $100 billion, which raises real questions about how much damage these stories could have done!!)

So in effect, Trump is demanding a $5 billion premium to confess that he’s actually the one who weaponized government against his adversaries.

image_print
Share this entry
65 replies
  1. P J Evans says:

    He’s still making noises about trying to run in 2028. Given that he can’t even speakoherently with either teleprompters or cue cards, this is delusional.

    • Cheez Whiz says:

      If the Republican party can prop him up in 2028, they will try to run him again, because they don’t (at this time) have a plausible replacement. But 3 years is a long time for a 79 yr old under pressure. No one knows what 2028 is gonna look like, other than chaotic and lots of lawsuits.

        • Commander Ogg says:

          That the 22nd Amendment says:

          No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice

          The President and his GOP backers will push the idea that the 22nd Amendment only explicitly bans someone being “elected” to more than two presidential terms – and says nothing of “succession”. The plan is to get somebody like J.D. Vance to run and win in ’28 with Trump as VP. Vance resigns and Trump succeeds him as President.
          https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx20lwedn23o

      • john paul jones says:

        When I watched one of Marcy’s videos the other day, it included clips of Trump from 2016, 2017, and it is truly remarkable to see that his responses then were quicker, his speech was (still crazy) but more focussed, the emphasis clearer, and so on. He has declined a very great deal since then. The comparison between ten years ago and now seemed quite striking. Will he even last another three years? I tend to think there might be some truth in the speculation that he’s recently suffered a stroke. True, he’s lazy, and so stress is unlikely to be as bad for him as it would be for a normal human, but I think Marcy is absolutely correct to point out what a huge effect the attempted assassination had on him.

    • Bad Boris says:

      2028?

      At the rate at which Trump is both physically and mentally decompensating I doubt the next vernal equinox is within his reach.

      • Knowatall says:

        There is a lot of punditry, and experienced commentary noting that dementia, as a disease, is a one-way street. It accelerates and abstaining from Tylenol won’t help him.

        • Memory hole says:

          If Tylenol won’t help, what if he shines a powerful, cleansing light up there. Trump really has a knack for these common sense solutions, he says.

          But on a serious note, with dementia, there may be better and worse days. But it trends to worse and worse.

          His 55 minute incoherent “speech” at the UN this morning sounded like grandpa forgot his meds on the world stage.

          Far from a doctor here, but I don’t think his mind will hold up three and a half years.

  2. gruntfuttock says:

    I know I’m shallow but is ‘Judge Steven Merryday’ a hobbit? I’m picturing him smoking a pipe of Old Longfellow and leaning back on a barrel of Jolly Pigsniffer while condemning Trump to be thrown into the Cracks of Doom unless he bucks up his legal theory pretty damn quick.

    And, if P J will forgive me, ‘speakoherently’ is one of my favourite Irish poets ;-)

      • harpie says:

        The Excellent Judge Steven D. Merryday:

        [pdf3/4] […] a complaint remains an improper and impermissible place for the tedious and burdensome aggregation of prospective evidence, for the rehearsal of tendentious arguments, or for the protracted recitation and explanation of legal authority putatively supporting the pleader’s claim for relief. As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective — not a protected platform to rage against an adversary. A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally or the functional equivalent of the Hyde Park Speakers’ Corner. […]

    • RockyGirl says:

      I worked for Steven Merryday when I was a baby lawyer in Florida and he was a partner in the law firm where I worked. He was (and almost certainly still is) a staunch Republican, but was also (and almost certainly still is) a “brook no nonsense” kind of guy. Trump & Co are going to have a much harder time with him than they had with the feckless Aileen Cannon.

      • harpie says:

        Oh, not surprising…appointed by GHWBush, but applying the law without
        fear or favor [unlike the feckless Cannon] is what [and all] I expect from any judge.

  3. wa_rickf says:

    Yesterday, Karoline Leavitt excused Trump’s demands for prosecutions of his adversaries by claiming poor Donald Trump was targeted by … Joe Biden…

    Not THAT crap again. Trump 1.0…it was Obama. Trump is such a loser in life.

      • Reader 21 says:

        He’s never gotten that many Americans to vote for him. Way too many, but not that many (and four million less than what Joe Biden beat him by in 2020).

  4. Thomas_H says:

    Trump should take is bottomless well of grievance on the road as a solo version of the Four Yorkshiremen skit.

  5. Ms. Dalloway says:

    You’re the most powerful man in the world, yet you’re harmed to the tune of billions and must file a lawsuit when someone writes or says anything that hurts your fee-fees — and you don’t see how weak and pathetic and small that makes you look. I know kindergarteners with more fortitude than you, Mr. Trump, and many times your intelligence.

  6. Savage Librarian says:

    Just a reminder that there are two interesting events tonight:

    Adelita Grijalva’s election results and Jimmy Kimmel returns.

    • Matt Foley says:

      “I hate my enemies.”
      –Jimmy Kimmel’s hate speech at Charlie Kirk’s memorial service

      Just kidding! That was Trump.

      • wa_rickf says:

        ⠀THAT was funny!
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⡿⠋⠉⠉⠻⢿⣦⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠹⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠸⣷⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣀⣀⣀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢻⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⣿⡿⠿⠿⠟⠛⠛⠻⢿⣿⣶⣄⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢈⣿⠆⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣤⣤⣤⣤⠀⠈⠻⣿⣇⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣾⡏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣴⡿⠋⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢹⡿⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⣀⣤⣼⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣿⣷⣄⠀
        ⢠⣾⠟⠋⠉⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⣿⣦⣀⣀⣀⣤⣤⣶⣶⠿⠋⠁⢹⣿⡇
        ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⡟⢉⣿⠋⠉⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⢸⣿⠀
        ⢸⣿⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣀⣀⣤⣴⠿⠋⠀⠘⣷⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢀⣴⣿⠏⠀
        ⢸⣿⡄⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠉⠉⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣸⣿⢶⣤⣤⣴⡶⠿⠛⠙⣿⣆⠀
        ⠈⣿⣇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢰⣿⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⣽⣿⠀
        ⠀⠘⣿⣆⠀⠀⠀⠀⣠⣤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⠻⣧⣀⡀⠀⠀⠀⣀⣠⣴⡿⠇⠀
        ⠀⠀⠘⢿⣿⣦⣤⣴⡿⠻⠿⣷⣦⣤⣤⣤⣴⣾⣿⡿⠿⠿⠿⠟⠛⠉⠀⠀⠀
        ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠉⢉⣉⠉⠀⠀

    • Matt___B says:

      Bookmarked JK’s YT channel in anticipation of seeing the monologue clip as soon as it’s available later tonight. I’m in California, so the show starts rolling at 8:35 local time and maybe they’ll upload clips to YT before the show is actually broadcast at 11:35 in order to be live to east-coasters.

      Also, thanks for reminding me of the Grijalva special election, didn’t know it was today…

      • Rayne says:

        Anyone planning to watch broadcast of Kimmel this evening should check the ownership of their local ABC affiliate first.

        The Hollywood Reporter @[email protected]

        ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Will Not Air on Nexstar and Sinclair, Impacting 66 ABC Stations | THR News Video
        https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/video/jimmy-kimmel-live-not-air-nexstar-and-sinclair-impacting-abc-stations-video/?utm_source=flipboard&utm_medium=activitypub

        Posted into Video @video-THR

        Jimmy Kimmel
        The Hollywood Reporter · 2h
        ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Will Not Air on Nexstar and Sinclair, Impacting 66 ABC Stations | THR News Video
        By Dominoe Ibarra

        Sep 23, 2025, 04:23 PM

        This was a head fake by Disney with a fuck-you by Sinclair and Nexstar.

        • flyingfish says:

          It will be interesting to see if Tegna abc stations also block Kimmel. Sacramento’s abc station that just got shot at is Tegna. I haven’t seen their response anywhere.

        • Rayne says:

          Canceling cable doesn’t hurt Sinclair or Nexstar as they rely on broadcast TV.

          I have been worried about Sinclair for years, since their role in swiftboating John Kerry. Their ownership of broadcast TV affiliates has been problematic for decades and getting worse.

        • David Wise says:

          I read that in 2022 Disney made $10B off “carriage fees” for ESPN, and that’s more than was made by their entire Entertainment Division. Cutting the cord hurts Disney more than cancelling Disney.

        • Rayne says:

          Cutting the cord also hurts other unrelated entities and limits access to other news providers (ex. I get BBC World News and HLN via cable). Think of more targeted efforts to hurt Disney — who’s advertising on ESPN? Stop watching ESPN and tell those advertisers you’re doing so. I’d suggest watching an alternative but that’s probably FOX Sports, under control of that Nazi Lachlan Murdoch. Perhaps killing the cable tier with sports is the best solution.

          If you own mutual funds have you checked the portfolios for any Disney stock? NYSE:DIS — contact your mutual fund analyst and tell them to ditch this holding because it’s too sensitive to White House whims and less responsive to its market. The stock has performed rather flaccidly since 2022 anyhow.

    • harpie says:

      In GEORGIA:

      https://bsky.app/profile/taniel.bsky.social/post/3lzk7xwmzxk2m
      September 23, 2025 at 8:53 PM

      Republicans have defended a state Senate seat in Georgia in a special election tonight.

      (This was a red seat that Trump won 67/33. I’ll post again when we have the final result; it’s looking likely that the margin will have shifted toward Dems compared to last year.)

      Update: We now have the final result in Georgia’s state Senate race: Jason Dickerson, the Republican, won 61.5% to 38.5%.

      Trump had carried the district 67/33.

      • harpie says:

        ALSO in GEORGIA:

        https://bsky.app/profile/taniel.bsky.social/post/3lzkfeo7n4s2p
        September 23, 2025 at 10:30 PM

        Tonight’s Georgia special got a huge amount of attention, though it was in quite a red district (Trump +33%).
        GOP retained it, though it shifted by 10% since 2024.

        But did you know there are
        2 STATEWIDE races in Georgia, in 6 weeks?

        If Dems manage to replicate that sort of swing, that’s 2 flips.
        [Link][screenshot]

        Links to:
        As Georgia Returns to Electing Its Utility Commission, Worries over Democracy Linger A pair of races are crystallizing issues with fair representation in Georgia: officials who stay in their seats years past their term, low-turnout runoffs, and the diluted power of Black voters. https://boltsmag.org/georgia-public-service-commission-elections-restart-2025/ Camille Squires September 16, 2025

  7. zscoreUSA says:

    Zev Shalev at Narativ has been publishing articles about Epstein, Maxwell, and Trump, and where they received their money, money laundering is covered heavily. I wonder if there is another Trump suit brewing.

    Chapters 9 & 10 cover Trump in more detail, including going from negative net worth in 1990 and ending up in 1996 with a value of $450 million, coincidentally the same amount that Epstein and Hoffenberg looted from Towers Financial.

    There is much discussion of money being laundered from organized crime sources through the casinos, including from the former Soviet Union and the Mogilevic crime syndicate. Even mention of DA Morgenthau’s 1991 attempt to prosecute Taj Majal for money laundering.

    https://www.narativ.org/s/the-greatest-heist/archive

    • Reader 21 says:

      Yes—the same Mogilovech whom Obama’s former FBI Director—one Robert S. Mueller—deemed “the most dangerous man in the world,” simultaneously elevating Eurasian (read: Russian) organized crime to the same threat level as terrorism (the RW lost its mind). Also the same Mogilovech whom poisoned ex KGB whistleblower Alexander Litvenenko credibly alleged to possess enormous coercive leverage (kompromat) over Vladimir Putin, and was the secret money fueling his mysterious rise from a mediocre KGB washout. And, not telling you anything you don’t know, but he was also euphemistically called Robert Maxwell’s “business partner.”

      And if Maggie NYT has covered a word of this, I’ve not seen it.

  8. HonestyPolicyCraig says:

    I know this may be a naive question, but do we know who wrote the lawsuit that contains the SAT cheat, military medals… ?

    And this bit,
    “As every lawyer knows (or is presumed to know), a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective not a protected platform to rage against an adversary”

    It’s missing the short paragraph. Who wrote the bad book report?

      • greenbird says:

        answer to who wrote complaint (it’s long):
        DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
        Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial as to all issues so triable.
        Dated: September 15, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
        /s/Alejandro Brito
        Alejandro Brito
        Florida Bar No. 098442
        BRITO, PLLC
        2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard
        Suite 650
        Coral Gables, FL 33134
        Tel: 305-614-4071
        Fax: 305-440-4385
        [email protected]
        [email protected]
        /s/Edward Andrew Paltzik
        Edward Andrew Paltzik
        Taylor Dykema PLLC
        914 E. 25th Street
        Houston, TX 77009
        Tel: 516-526-0341
        [email protected]
        (pro hac vice admission forthcoming)
        /s/Daniel Zachary Epstein
        Daniel Zachary Epstein
        Epstein & Co. LLC
        8903 Glades Rd Ste A8 #2090 Boca Raton, FL 33434
        Tel: 202-240-2398
        [email protected]
        (pro hac vice admission forthcoming)
        Counsel to Plaintiff
        President Donald J. Trump

      • greenbird says:

        answer to who wrote complaint (it’s long):
        DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
        Plaintiff hereby demands a jury trial as to all issues so triable.
        Dated: September 15, 2025 Respectfully submitted,
        /s/Alejandro Brito
        Alejandro Brito
        Florida Bar No. 098442
        BRITO, PLLC
        2121 Ponce de Leon Boulevard
        Suite 650
        Coral Gables, FL 33134
        Tel: 305-614-4071
        Fax: 305-440-4385
        [email protected]
        [email protected]
        /s/Edward Andrew Paltzik
        Edward Andrew Paltzik
        Taylor Dykema PLLC
        914 E. 25th Street
        Houston, TX 77009
        Tel: 516-526-0341
        [email protected]
        (pro hac vice admission forthcoming)
        /s/Daniel Zachary Epstein
        Daniel Zachary Epstein
        Epstein & Co. LLC
        8903 Glades Rd Ste A8 #2090 Boca Raton, FL 33434
        Tel: 202-240-2398
        [email protected]
        (pro hac vice admission forthcoming)
        Counsel to Plaintiff
        President Donald J. Trump

    • greenbird says:

      for ORDER doc:
      Case 8:25-cv-02487-SDM-NHA Document 5 Filed 09/19/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID.165 =
      2025 FLMD 021487 09 Sep 19 Doc5 4p ORDER flmd.447437.5.0_1.pdf

    • Kenneth Almquist says:

      Based on the information provided by greenbird, a copy of the case docket can be found here: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71354540/trump-v-new-york-times-company/

      The first entry in the docket is the complaint, and if we scroll to the end we find the lawyers who signed it and the firms they work for:

      Alejandro Brito (Brito PLLC – Florida)
      Edward Andrew Paltzik (Taylor Dykema PLLC – Texas)
      Daniel Zachary Epstein (Epstein & Co. LLC – Florida)

      The last of these has an unfortunate name for someone representing Donald Trump at the present time.

    • HonestyPolicyCraig says:

      Thank you! I wonder how Trump, or his fixer, picks them. We’ll never know that answer, lol.

      Just a brief look at the news this morning, it appears everything is a defamation lawsuit. Somebody said something bad about somebody else.

      It does appear that our legal system is under a lot of strain right now.

      • Reader 21 says:

        He can sue everyone and everything, over even the most specious claims—while at the same time has, courtesy of John Roberts, been granted effective immunity from prosecution for his criming. Helluva system.

  9. BRUCE F COLE says:

    Someone please tell me we’re at the stage in The Emperor’s New Clothes story when the little kid says:
    “Look mommy, he’s naked and I can’t even see his penis!”

  10. The Old Redneck says:

    As Rocky Girl said, Judge Merryday does not suffer fools gladly.

    I suspect Trump’s lawyers can clean up their complaint enough to state a claim. But the damage has already been done. The case may not even survive a summary judgment (the next real hurdle in the process). By then, unfortunately, the world’s attention will be on something else from Trump’s inexhaustible supply of theatrics.

  11. Zinsky123 says:

    Looking at the bullet points from Peter Baker’s article and EW’s summary, Trump really has led a remarkably corrupt and immoral life! Multiple extramarital affairs, numerous bankruptcies and defaults on bond issues, close to 5,000 lawsuits filed against him, close friends with one of the most pernicious child rapists in modern history, money laundering schemes – Trump has dirt piled a mile high in his life! Yet, laughably, some of his followers still assert that “he has never done anything wrong”! Sheesh!

    • HonestyPolicyCraig says:

      He is right about everything. :sleepy face:

      [Moderator’s note: please avoid emojis as they are not searchable and screen readers may not pick them up. Emoticons are acceptable. /~Rayne]

  12. Reader 21 says:

    “Last year, he claimed his personal brand was worth just $15 billion, whereas last week, he claimed it was worth $100 billion, which raises real questions about how much damage these stories could have done!!”. Indeed it does.

    Further, given that his personal wealth has gone from $15b to $100b — so during a period the vast majority of which he’s spent in the White House, his wealth increased by $85 billion— it also raises real questions about just how deep and vast the corruption goes.

    May the rake-stomping and admissions against self-interest continue.

    • Reader 21 says:

      From today’s Message Box from Dan Pfeiffer, who recommends wrapping all of this—the creeping authoritarianism, the weaponization of the DOJ, the blatant pay for play, crypto grifting etc—under the bow of corruption, a framing voters already associate with Don the Con:

      “Trump is abusing his power, ignoring the advice of career prosecutors, and targeting his enemies. With Kimmel and the FCC, it’s big government colluding with corporations to silence critics. With TikTok, it’s a multibillion-dollar deal steered to pro-Trump billionaires. With Tom Homan, DOJ dropped an investigation after he was caught on tape taking $50,000 in a paper bag from an undercover FBI agent.

      “Authoritarianism is corruption in action. And calling it that connects Trump’s abuses to something voters already understand and despise.”

Comments are closed.