Which 2003 Document Was Hayden Talking About?
I’d like to return to this post, in which I tried to figure out which 2003 OLC opinion approved–according to Michael Hayden–waterboarding.
Michael Hayden said something that confused me today on Fox News. When asked whether he thought waterboarding is torture, he replied simply that DOJ had said it was not.
Question: Are you satisfied that waterboarding is not torture?
HAYDEN: I’m satisfied that the Justice Department, in a series of opinions — ‘02, ‘03, ‘05 — said that it was not. Now…
See, we know that DOJ addressed waterboarding specifically in 2002 and 2005 in the memos released last week.
But 2003?
We may well have found our answer in the IG Report. As I’ve been chronicling, John Yoo helped the Counterterrorism Center develop a "Legal Principles" document in 2003 that included waterboarding among permissible techniques. Scott Muller would claim Yoo’s involvement in the process constituted DOJ agreement with the principles espoused in the document. But in 2004, Jack Goldsmith asserted that the Legal Principles document, "did not and do not represent an opinion or a statement of the views" OLC.
So it appears likely that Michael Hayden claimed that OLC had written an opinion on waterboarding that OLC claims does not constitute an opinion. If so, then the squabble between OLC and CIA over that document remains active (or at least did, as of earlier this year, when Hayden still headed the CIA).
But there’s another part of the earlier post I’d like to return to: a 2003 "secret memo" from the White House "explicitly endorsing" CIA’s use of torture.
Here’s the WaPo’s description of this 2003 memo, from last year when we were all trying to elect Barack Obama President.
The Bush administration issued a pair of secret memos to the CIA in 2003 and 2004 that explicitly endorsed the agency’s use of interrogation techniques such as waterboarding against al-Qaeda suspects — documents prompted by worries among intelligence officials about a possible backlash if details of the program became public.
Now that we know of the "Legal Principles" document, I don’t think this is what Hayden referred to, since there was also a 2004 document and Hayden didn’t mention a 2004 OLC endorsement of torture (which is all the more remarkable, given that Daniel Levin did authorize the use of waterboarding in an August 2004 letter).