Finally! Our Declining Manufacturing Base Becomes a National Security Issue

I have long argued that the way to address the big problems our government is currently all-but-ignoring, not least jobs and climate change, is to talk about how our current policies put us at significant national security risk. If nothing else, by demonstrating how these are national security issues, it’ll provide a way to reverse fear-monger against the Republicans trying to gut our country for profit.

Which is why I’m happy to learn that the intelligence community is assessing whether the decline in manufacturing in the US represents a national security threat.

The U.S. intelligence community will prepare a National Intelligence Estimate on the implications of the continuing decline in U.S. manufacturing capacity, said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL) citing recent news reports.

Our growing reliance on imports and lack of industrial infrastructure has become a national security concern,” said Rep. Schakowsky.  She spoke at a March 16 news conference (at 28:10) in opposition to the pending U.S.-Korea Free Trade Agreement.The Forbes report referenced by Rep. Schakowsky was “Intelligence Community Fears U.S. Manufacturing Decline,” by Loren Thompson, February 14. The decision to prepare an intelligence estimate was first reported by Richard McCormack in “Intelligence Director Will Look at National Security Implications of U.S. Manufacturing Decline,” Manufacturing & Technology News, February 3.

Note that Schakowsky is a member of (and until January, was a Subcommittee Chair on) the House Intelligence Committee. It’s possible her own requests generated this concern.

But the concern is real. As our manufacturing moves to places like China and (significantly for this context), Korea, we’ve lost certain capabilities. Indeed, when Bush slapped tariffs on steel in 2002, a number of tool and die factories moved to Korea where they could still access cheap steel while still supplying the US market. And in recent years, the loss of highly-skilled manufacturing process capabilities has meant we face challenges in sourcing some of our key military toys.

While it shouldn’t be the primary reason to invest in manufacturing in this country, ultimately if we keep losing it we’re going to have problems sustaining our military machine.

Most of the folks running DC may not much care that our middle class has disappeared along with our manufacturing base. But convince them that our declining manufacturing base might imperil their cherished military might, and they might finally wake up.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Finally! Our Declining Manufacturing Base Becomes a National Security Issue

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @NaomiGilens: My paper on warrant canaries, posted in light of Apple apparently killing its Section 215 canary: http://t.co/u7By6hmJk4
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PatrickCToomey Good paper but frustrating to see claim 215 only used for telecom. First confirmed for TATP precursors. @NaomiGilens
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @RobertsDan: Barbara Mikulski, who blocked Paul's call for separate Syrian vote, is effectively filibustering on Senate floor now - talk…
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel We interrupt forever war to bring you Orioles RT @KenGude: war debates happen all the time but the O’s haven’t won the AL East since ’97!!!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 False: New editor at Politico. You just don't know her.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Barb Mikulski interrupts ISIS war debate ('no way to minimize debate" she says) to talk abt Orioles, wearing bright orange jacket.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HanniFakhoury Curious whether Apple decided to do that before or after Riley.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Hey, one of NFL's accused wife and/or child beaters is NOT getting a paid vacation on Exempt List. https://t.co/JTOzShg6CX
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @docexblog Ah, thanks. Should have cc'ed you on that question. Now I'm utterly fascinated by play of 9/17 date: Constitution & 9/17/01 MON.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @docexblog: @emptywheel @saftergood Under Act CIG became CIA day after Forrestal sworn in (which was Sept. 17), in Doc 1 here http://t.c…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel CIA website dates founding of CIA to signing of National Security Act, which was July 26, 1947. Why is today its birthday? @saftergood
1hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2011
S M T W T F S
« Feb   Apr »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031