Obama Will Not Veto Defense Authorization

I said this about the detainee provisions in the conference Defense Authorization bill.

It seems to me the language does enough to avoid a veto from the cowardly Obama, but still does terrible damage to both the clarity of national security roles and overall investigative expertise.

And I was absolutely correct: Obama’s aides have announced he will not veto the bill.

Update: Here’s the specific language of the capitulation.

We have been clear that “any bill that challenges or constrains the President’s critical authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the Nation would prompt the President’s senior advisers to recommend a veto.”  After intensive engagement by senior administration officials and the President himself, the Administration has succeeded in prompting the authors of the detainee provisions to make several important changes, including the removal of problematic provisions. While we remain concerned about the uncertainty that this law will create for our counterterrorism professionals, the most recent changes give the President additional discretion in determining how the law will be implemented, consistent with our values and the rule of law, which are at the heart of our country’s strength. This legislation authorizes critical funding for military personnel overseas, and its passage sends an important signal that Congress supports our efforts as we end the war in Iraq and transition to Afghan lead while ensuring that our military can meet the challenges of the 21st century.

As a result of these changes, we have concluded that the language does not challenge or constrain the President’s ability to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the American people, and the President’s senior advisors will not recommend a veto.  However, if in the process of implementing this law we determine that it will negatively impact our counterterrorism professionals and undercut our commitment to the rule of law, we expect that the authors of these provisions will work quickly and tirelessly to correct these problems.

Update: Here’s the roll call. the Dems split right down the middle, 93-93, which leads me to suspect Pelosi told Boehner the Republicans had to come up with the bulk of the yes votes, which might be why the House leadership had to stall on the vote for a period.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Obama Will Not Veto Defense Authorization

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @Bethrich52 Yes. I've written about it. My hope is along w/everything else that Horowitz is pushing for he sneaks in override of OPR.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Note, it's not JUST DHS that has privacy problems w/cyber sharing. DOJ's IG found people aren't sharing w/FBI bc of privacy concerns too.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ddayen: Ironically, TPP is stumbling over which pieces of protectionism to maintain: prescription drugs, sugar, rice, dairy http://t.co
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tonygoldd3 OK OK OK. But remember this involves space heroes AND @ChuckGrassley in a crummy mood abt DOJ's latest power grab.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel The Inspectors General have gotten space hero John Glenn to weigh in against DOJ's efforts to limit IG access. https://t.co/QQHS7n3l52
27mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy Sort of slow for a primary qua general. Just now?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mar7k Lindsey, who has a driver and no wife, doesn't have either of those problems. @TyMcCormick
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Apparently beating up McCain will change people's opinion about someone. http://t.co/7bfsbG5Ptu
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jbendery Let's work helmet laws in there too. That'll get 'em.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jbendery Cause preemies can survive. But not "naturally."
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jbendery Does keeping an ill person --or a preemie--on a respirator count as "natural life"?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jbendery I raise it bc I think hammering GOPers on what they mean by that term would highlight problems w/their stance against choice.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2011
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031