Obama Will Not Veto Defense Authorization

I said this about the detainee provisions in the conference Defense Authorization bill.

It seems to me the language does enough to avoid a veto from the cowardly Obama, but still does terrible damage to both the clarity of national security roles and overall investigative expertise.

And I was absolutely correct: Obama’s aides have announced he will not veto the bill.

Update: Here’s the specific language of the capitulation.

We have been clear that “any bill that challenges or constrains the President’s critical authorities to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the Nation would prompt the President’s senior advisers to recommend a veto.”  After intensive engagement by senior administration officials and the President himself, the Administration has succeeded in prompting the authors of the detainee provisions to make several important changes, including the removal of problematic provisions. While we remain concerned about the uncertainty that this law will create for our counterterrorism professionals, the most recent changes give the President additional discretion in determining how the law will be implemented, consistent with our values and the rule of law, which are at the heart of our country’s strength. This legislation authorizes critical funding for military personnel overseas, and its passage sends an important signal that Congress supports our efforts as we end the war in Iraq and transition to Afghan lead while ensuring that our military can meet the challenges of the 21st century.

As a result of these changes, we have concluded that the language does not challenge or constrain the President’s ability to collect intelligence, incapacitate dangerous terrorists, and protect the American people, and the President’s senior advisors will not recommend a veto.  However, if in the process of implementing this law we determine that it will negatively impact our counterterrorism professionals and undercut our commitment to the rule of law, we expect that the authors of these provisions will work quickly and tirelessly to correct these problems.

Update: Here’s the roll call. the Dems split right down the middle, 93-93, which leads me to suspect Pelosi told Boehner the Republicans had to come up with the bulk of the yes votes, which might be why the House leadership had to stall on the vote for a period.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Obama Will Not Veto Defense Authorization

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @GreggJLevine @emptywheel @AJAMScrutineer Wait, we licensed you to trash talk?
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Emptywheel’s Super Bowl XLIX Trash Talk https://t.co/ZgcbSkvV5J
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @armandodkos what is this Talkleft joint you speak of?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @maryjpitzl I am downtown now, and the drive here from Camelback was crazy
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @sbagen Yeah don't agree with that by Alarcon
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Think you're going soft. It's because the boys are hogging the squat rack, isn't it? @TheBlahDalia
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @fedcourts @espinsegall @MDAppeal Still have Pregerson, Reinhardt, Shroeder and Canby all left from Carter.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @AllThingsHLS @vicenews I'm telling them you sent me!
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel As a Blog-Zombie, I find the whole dead-blogging thing tedious, but this, from @NYTimeskrugman, is good. http://t.co/x1xP9Thi24
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @vicenews @AllThingsHLS Crap, you mean I have to take my drone home?
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ahmed: New Saudi intelligence chief Khaled Al Humaidan studied criminal justice at @SVSU in Michigan http://t.co/53gaLRPnSm http://t.co
48mreplyretweetfavorite
December 2011
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031