William Welch Probably NOT One of the Attorneys Who Engaged in Gross Prosecutorial Misconduct in Stevens Case

As Ryan Reilly reported, Judge Emmet Sullivan is moving forward with his plan to release the scathing report on the Ted Stevens prosecution showing the prosecution was “permeated by the systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence.”

Back when descriptions of this report first surfaced, I asked, “Why Is William Welch, Whose Team Is Accused of Intentional Prosecutorial Misconduct, Still at DOJ?

Given Sullivan’s latest order, I think the answer must be that Welch is not one of the four DOJ lawyers most badly implicated in the report. That’s because DOJ, which after all still employs Welch to prosecute whistleblowers, had no objection to the report being released on March 15.

The Department of Justice’s Notice advised the Court that it “does not intend to file a motion regarding Mr. Schuelke’s report” and that “[t]he government does not contend that there is any legal prohibition on the disclosure of any references in Mr. Schuelke’s report to grand jury material, court authorized interceptions of wire communications, or any sealed pleadings or transcripts that have now been unsealed.” Notice of Dep’t of Justice Regarding Materials Referenced in Mr. Schuelke’s Report, at 1-2 (“DOJ Notice”). In addition, the Department of Justice informed the Court that it was not asserting any deliberative process or attorney-work product privilege with respect to the information contained in Mr. Schuelke’s Report.

Criminal Division head Lanny Breuer has already proven himself more than willing to hide the misconduct of his prosecutors; I have no doubt he’d do so here if it badly implicated any of his current attorneys.

So I’m guessing–though that is a guess–that Welch is not one of the four fighting to prevent this release.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to William Welch Probably NOT One of the Attorneys Who Engaged in Gross Prosecutorial Misconduct in Stevens Case

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JONF34 @mucha_carlos Well, unless she pays me to defend her, I might be good with that.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel So will reading abt donor to KARL ROVE's PAC sniffing at what a "vile" campaign Trump is running. https://t.co/bYqxilzEs0
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Story of GOP donors wailing bc $$ "is devalued currency in blustery, post-policy [Trump] campaign" will make you weep http://t.co/s5BMEjKPLl
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Solving Yemen's crisis w/passive voice: “We believe more care needs to be taken to avoid civilian casualties.” http://t.co/v67XDt8GbJ
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade So I thought that it was possible someone had planted that.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade I had speculated that it would be really easy to PLANT someone's name in Ashley Madison, bc there's no email verification.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Thought that same thought, but he did admit to it, right?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @RMFifthCircuit I think Berman's decision sticks. But will wait to see briefing to make any definitive bet.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IanPGunn @WALLACHLEGAL @McCannSportsLaw @amilst44 @WerlySportsLaw yeah, crap, I had late Tuesday. What a dope I was.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Shorter billionaire owners: Goodell's witch hunt in name of "integrity of the game" makes us look like cheats. https://t.co/whPO04tnFh
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @RMFifthCircuit Though, there is a lot of new blood on the 2nd. Interesting to see if any are on the panel.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I wonder if NSA would let us know if someone broke into their 0day collection? Hahaha. Just kidding. https://t.co/TAdQe7yxyj
2hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829