The Other Drinking Soldiers

In his post on our clearance for payments to Egypt, Jim noted that the key graph came 13 paragraphs into an 18 paragraph story.

Likewise, the key graph from the NYT story letting a senior American official lay out a narrative blaming the staff sergeant’s massacre of Afghan civilians on marital problems comes at the end–paragraph 22 out of 25. After the official talks about the soldier snapping due to personalized stress exacerbated when one of the soldier’s colleagues was gravely wounded the day before the attack, we finally learn where he got this information:

The senior American official said the account of the sergeant’s state of mind came from two other soldiers with whom he drank alcohol on the night of the shootings.

Particularly given reports from survivors of the massacre there was more than one soldier–and they were drunk–I find it interesting that the suspect had been drinking with at least two other soldiers that night. Add in the report that the solder had left the base twice, not just once.

An Afghan guard at the Nato base told the BBC that the soldier left the base twice. He returned at 00:30 local time (20:00 GMT) after the first trip out and was out between 02:00 and 04:00 for the second trip.

At the very least, you have to ask how the other soldiers the Staff Sergeant had been drinking with let him leave the base, twice. Particularly if they believed him to be as disturbed as they told the Senior official he was. But it also really raises questions about whether the soldier was alone when he left the base the first time (if he indeed left twice, which an AP report from yesterday appears to support as well). And it raises questions about whether the other soldiers would have their own reasons–besides the prohibited drinking–to obscure what happened.

Now consider Hamid Karzai’s complaint that the US did not cooperate with Afghans investigating the killing.

Karzai said on Friday that the delegation he sent to investigate the deadly shootings of 16 Afghan civilians did not receive the cooperation the Afghans expected from American officials.

The article reporting Karzai’s complaint juxtaposes the complaint with negotiations on night raids.

A U.S. official said Friday that talks with the Afghan government about night raids by NATO troops are going ahead despite the alleged killing spree by a U.S. soldier and a combative statement from the Afghan president.

Now, Karzai could just be complaining because he, himself, is under a lot of stress as the Taliban presses for advantage.

But there sue does seem to be more to this killing than senior officials speaking anonymously to the NYT would like to admit.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

77 Responses to The Other Drinking Soldiers

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @gregorydjohnsen: 3/n the optics don't look great - a drone strike to show the US could and would still conduct strikes in Yemen
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @rj_gallagher @CIA 1) No one 2) Some contractor they deny a fair trial 3) The person that revealed it to press
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mattblaze I think Jules Verne might even have envisioned it if word robot had been available. All the better bc it'd be in newspaper
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Alright. I'll admit it. Mitt DOES look nice w/Jeb's boot print on his fanny.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Who produces a reality show where the most famous and loathed competitor drops out right at the beginning. Don't fuck up my Reality Show!!
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Really, the CIA is just one long TS Eliot poem and was that way long before Angleton ran the joint.
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In honor of CIA's new NCS head, will rename this post, "In a wilderness of mirrors. What will the spider do," https://t.co/OCyCD1bMDm
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sethdmichaels It's a long way to 2016.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sethdmichaels Sure. But Sandoval could actually beat the Democrats.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How come no one is starting Brian Sandoval rumors?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How long until we get the Big Scoop™ of the consultant explaining to Mitt he couldn't credibly be the candidate of wage inequality?
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Was thinking of starting a Twitter account called Dingell in Retirement but I can't outsnark this: https://t.co/Kph83CxgUG cc: @JohnDingell
1hreplyretweetfavorite