Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

I’m a sucker for groups of adoptive kids. Like the time when a group of Michigan families with adopted Ethiopian kids had a rambunctious reunion at my favorite Ethiopian restaurant, with the owner catering to the kids like a grandparent. Or the time I shared a restaurant in Guangzhou with a bunch of French families who had just picked up their baby daughters; they somehow expected these girls who had lived in Chinese orphanages to immediately understand how to act like proper French kids.

There’s a lot that can be abusive in international adoptions, but when I see joyful gatherings like these, I’m awestruck by the faith such parents have in our common humanity.

Which is why I’ve been obsessing by one of the implications of this post. As I noted, DHS’s Inspector General helpfully explained that among all the other people in DHS’ IDENT database are the American citizens who had adopted internationally.

Individuals with fingerprints in IDENT include persons with an immigration history, such as aliens who have been removed but have reentered the country, immigration visa applicants, legal permanent residents, naturalized citizens, and some U.S. citizens.
IDENT includes two categories of U.S. citizens:

  • Citizens who have adopted a child from abroad (which involves U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services), participated in a trusted traveler program, or may have been fingerprinted by immigration officials for smuggling aliens or drugs across U.S. borders;
  • Individuals who were not citizens at the time that their fingerprints were collected, but subsequently became citizens through naturalization, legal permanent residency, or immigration.[my emphasis]

Now, we can be pretty sure that when NCTC decided it needed to acquire US agency databases and data mine them with their existing terrorism databases, complete with the US person data they included, the IDENT database–the primary purpose of which is to track people who’ve come through the immigration system–was one of the first databases they went after.

Which is another way of saying the US persons in the IDENT database should assume they’ll also be in NCTC’s databases for five years. Including those parents who adopted children from China or Ethiopia or Guatemala or Romania.

“Well, if they’ve done nothing wrong they don’t have anything to be worried about.”

Perhaps. Except that the kind of people who adopt kids internationally may also tend to have reason for a significant number of international connections, whether because of religious faith, an effort to establish some tie to their child’s native country, or a comfort with international travel.

There are a lot of people whose biometric data shouldn’t be mined along with a bunch of terrorist suspects. At the top of that list, though, are families whose primary interaction with Bureau of Customs and Immigration Services entailed adopting a baby from another country.

Tweet about this on Twitter6Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook3Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @janehamsher: FDL Exclusive: DOJ FOIA Documents Say Smarter Sentencing Act Would Save Taxpayers $24 Billion http://t.co/D8ka5p5VNX #SSA
20sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Mansfield2016: Bolden is a former general cousnel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund; and then there's Stivers: https://…
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is there an official definition of a Caliphate? Cause Olsen seems to think he knows one when he sees one. Wouldn't that be a "state"?
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Olsen: "NCTC, we see the results of that collection without knowing where it came from." On Section 215. Interesting.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Mueller having been caught in a lie, Olsen moves the ball and says we just have to share as much info.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good job by Isikoff on calling out Mueller's lie about the "gap" that needed to be filled by Section 215.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If I were asking these questions I'd ask what happened at Mueller's May 2004 meeting at Cheney's office and at his request. Never explained.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Isikoff: DId you have any concerns ethically [about torture]? Mueller: [cuts him off] You have my answer.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang He missed the entire Benghazi industry? @Isikoff
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Ali_Gharib This is you announcing your book on all the lies Israel has gotten away with? I expect to read it in 2024, then?
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nickmartin Then again, McCain will say anything to get his name in the news and appear to be relevant.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930