Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

I’m a sucker for groups of adoptive kids. Like the time when a group of Michigan families with adopted Ethiopian kids had a rambunctious reunion at my favorite Ethiopian restaurant, with the owner catering to the kids like a grandparent. Or the time I shared a restaurant in Guangzhou with a bunch of French families who had just picked up their baby daughters; they somehow expected these girls who had lived in Chinese orphanages to immediately understand how to act like proper French kids.

There’s a lot that can be abusive in international adoptions, but when I see joyful gatherings like these, I’m awestruck by the faith such parents have in our common humanity.

Which is why I’ve been obsessing by one of the implications of this post. As I noted, DHS’s Inspector General helpfully explained that among all the other people in DHS’ IDENT database are the American citizens who had adopted internationally.

Individuals with fingerprints in IDENT include persons with an immigration history, such as aliens who have been removed but have reentered the country, immigration visa applicants, legal permanent residents, naturalized citizens, and some U.S. citizens.
IDENT includes two categories of U.S. citizens:

  • Citizens who have adopted a child from abroad (which involves U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services), participated in a trusted traveler program, or may have been fingerprinted by immigration officials for smuggling aliens or drugs across U.S. borders;
  • Individuals who were not citizens at the time that their fingerprints were collected, but subsequently became citizens through naturalization, legal permanent residency, or immigration.[my emphasis]

Now, we can be pretty sure that when NCTC decided it needed to acquire US agency databases and data mine them with their existing terrorism databases, complete with the US person data they included, the IDENT database–the primary purpose of which is to track people who’ve come through the immigration system–was one of the first databases they went after.

Which is another way of saying the US persons in the IDENT database should assume they’ll also be in NCTC’s databases for five years. Including those parents who adopted children from China or Ethiopia or Guatemala or Romania.

“Well, if they’ve done nothing wrong they don’t have anything to be worried about.”

Perhaps. Except that the kind of people who adopt kids internationally may also tend to have reason for a significant number of international connections, whether because of religious faith, an effort to establish some tie to their child’s native country, or a comfort with international travel.

There are a lot of people whose biometric data shouldn’t be mined along with a bunch of terrorist suspects. At the top of that list, though, are families whose primary interaction with Bureau of Customs and Immigration Services entailed adopting a baby from another country.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Pachacutec_ The mosquito effect is still rippling!
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Obama could've picked an AG nom to put DOJ back on track to propriety+fairness. Instead it's Lynch who wants to turn grandmas into snitches
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @bmaz But, but, she just said waterboarding is torture! ZOMG!!1!
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Loretta Lynch will provide all the worst parts of the Holder DOJ out of control prosecutorial zealotry with none of the progressive touches.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @markknoller: "Waterboarding is torture, Senator, and thus illegal," says Atty Gen nominee Loretta Lynch at confirmation hearing this mo…
10mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @LeslieMolony Maybe. But he certainly attracts them with how sloppy he is when eating. Even right after teeth get floated...
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz 12 Reasons Not to Trust Chuck Schumer http://t.co/UHzylFd7Tj Never forget the wise words of @Pachacutec_
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ Was just gonna comment on that. You Incans are quite well preserved.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Has Goodell and his stooge Ted Wells gotten around to interviewing the NFL "ball checker official" who set the Patriots up?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ Heh, nice work then!
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Pachacutec_: @bmaz someone with access once told me he sputtered over a post of mine, who the hell is pacha... What IS that?
19mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930