Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

I’m a sucker for groups of adoptive kids. Like the time when a group of Michigan families with adopted Ethiopian kids had a rambunctious reunion at my favorite Ethiopian restaurant, with the owner catering to the kids like a grandparent. Or the time I shared a restaurant in Guangzhou with a bunch of French families who had just picked up their baby daughters; they somehow expected these girls who had lived in Chinese orphanages to immediately understand how to act like proper French kids.

There’s a lot that can be abusive in international adoptions, but when I see joyful gatherings like these, I’m awestruck by the faith such parents have in our common humanity.

Which is why I’ve been obsessing by one of the implications of this post. As I noted, DHS’s Inspector General helpfully explained that among all the other people in DHS’ IDENT database are the American citizens who had adopted internationally.

Individuals with fingerprints in IDENT include persons with an immigration history, such as aliens who have been removed but have reentered the country, immigration visa applicants, legal permanent residents, naturalized citizens, and some U.S. citizens.
IDENT includes two categories of U.S. citizens:

  • Citizens who have adopted a child from abroad (which involves U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services), participated in a trusted traveler program, or may have been fingerprinted by immigration officials for smuggling aliens or drugs across U.S. borders;
  • Individuals who were not citizens at the time that their fingerprints were collected, but subsequently became citizens through naturalization, legal permanent residency, or immigration.[my emphasis]

Now, we can be pretty sure that when NCTC decided it needed to acquire US agency databases and data mine them with their existing terrorism databases, complete with the US person data they included, the IDENT database–the primary purpose of which is to track people who’ve come through the immigration system–was one of the first databases they went after.

Which is another way of saying the US persons in the IDENT database should assume they’ll also be in NCTC’s databases for five years. Including those parents who adopted children from China or Ethiopia or Guatemala or Romania.

“Well, if they’ve done nothing wrong they don’t have anything to be worried about.”

Perhaps. Except that the kind of people who adopt kids internationally may also tend to have reason for a significant number of international connections, whether because of religious faith, an effort to establish some tie to their child’s native country, or a comfort with international travel.

There are a lot of people whose biometric data shouldn’t be mined along with a bunch of terrorist suspects. At the top of that list, though, are families whose primary interaction with Bureau of Customs and Immigration Services entailed adopting a baby from another country.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Data Mining Adoptive Parents along with Suspected Terrorists

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Awesome that State is moving up the weekend doc dump from 5:30. Respectful of this important holiday weekend. https://t.co/V0G0eH2eSW
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Uncle_Jimbo You don't talk about any program at all! (But I suspect you don't know which NSA program is my fav) @AlJazeera
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I wonder if FBI uses Roving Wiretap provision in its efforts to attack Tor relays in US? Is that possible? https://t.co/1JSMrrnGSt
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel What's funny abt "if a bomb went off, rush to see if network" is phone dragnet wouldn't have worked w/Tsarnaevs. http://t.co/YYtl97Szg8
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @april_anita That it didn't happen in Chicago surprises me. They have even further to drive to their weekend homes!
39mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joshgerstein Indeed.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Comey’s Emphasis on Expiring PATRIOT Provisions: Other 215 Uses & Roving Wiretaps https://t.co/1JSMrrnGSt
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @FaizaPatelBCJ If only someone can get standing to make that argument... @AlexanderAbdo @AmosToh
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SeanVitka Yeah. Point is just that bulk is utterly meaningless in USAF because it only means not-all, not not-bulk-as-normal-humans-think
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SeanVitka "Must reapprove order with every Gig of collection." I could live with that.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SeanVitka Well then they can come back to congress or at least FISC and bump up their memory allowance for non-bulk collection.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AlexanderAbdo And also consistent w/language in 702 MPs, to which these appear VERY closely tied. @FaizaPatelBCJ @AmosToh
58mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930