Right on Cue, the Counter-Argument to the Torture Apology Comes Out

Three years ago, I rather sheepishly gave Dianne Feinstein kudos for the seriousness of the Senate Intelligence Committee inquiry into torture. I said then–and I maintain now–that reports of the investigation make it sound like a far more substantive investigation than I had at first worried it would be.

But I will say that the apparent timing of its release seems unfortunate. Because it is likely to come out in the wake of the Jose Rodriguez propaganda, the SSCI report is being portrayed as the other side of a two-sided debate rather than the result of the sustained, exhaustive inquiry it is.

A nearly three-year-long investigation by Senate Intelligence Committee Democrats is expected to find there is little evidence the harsh “enhanced interrogation techniques” the CIA used on high-value prisoners produced counter-terrorism breakthroughs.

[snip]

President Barack Obama and his aides have largely sought to avoid revisiting Bush administration controversies. But the debate over the effectiveness of enhanced interrogations, which human rights advocates condemn as torture, is resurfacing, in part thanks to a new book by a former top CIA official.

In the book, “Hard Measures,” due to be published on Monday, April 30, the former chief of CIA clandestine operations Jose Rodriguez defends the use of interrogation practices including water-boarding, which involves pouring water on a subject’s face, which is covered with a cloth, to simulate drowning.

Whether the timing–coming out just as Mitt Romney and his torturer-advisors face off against Obama in the General Election–was planned or not, the effect will be to turn torture into a campaign issue with two sides treated as legitimate by a spineless press, rather than one side with self-preservation in mind and the other with exhaustive study.

And sadly, that will probably mean the most interesting (and politically explosive) result of the investigation gets lost, relegated to paragraph 26 of 27.

Critics also say that still-classified records are likely to demonstrate that harsh interrogation techniques produced far more information that proved false than true.

Dana Priest reveals that, when Jose Rodriguez tried to persuade her not to publish news of the black sites in 2005, he tried to argue torture “was producing real results and helping to keep the country safe.” We’re about to get validation that the example of Ibn Sheikh al-Libi was not unique (though his treatment was included in the scope of the SSCI study). If torture “was producing real results” those results were false confessions, not real intelligence.

If we’re going to have a debate about torture, the fact that Cheney and his torturers used it to create false stories to–among other things–get us into the Iraq War should be at the center of that debate.

Tweet about this on Twitter16Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

12 Responses to Right on Cue, the Counter-Argument to the Torture Apology Comes Out

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq But I guess I just made up that it was released in multiple documents? @BradMossEsq @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq What do I know? I wrote 40 posts that included all he said? @BradMossEsq @Paulmd199 @ashk4n
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen (That was sarcasm)
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen What does this mean, I'm not sure I understand it: "DOJ can prove it"?
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen At least the conduct disclosed, the others were orders of magnitudes larger. Tho could be matter of disclosure.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Maybe if we invented concept of "Banks of Color" Bank of America would go to jail for helping fund drug trafficking? http://t.co/Aq9CdDsWZK
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Your modest proposal link or the latest bank payoff link? The latter is hard to keep up with, I know.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@ddayen on PR settlements "PR moves masquerading as crackdowns do violence to the very concept of justice." http://t.co/FMu92Gy9n3
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Ho hum, another bank -- Bank of America -- gets to pay its way out of crimes common street dealers do hard time for. http://t.co/Aq9CdDsWZK
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @chriswnews @brahmresnik @GovBrewer Always works out so well when malignant governmental agencies investigate themselves.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Atrios But Cross Fit abs!
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq That's very simple English. If you contest that English than by necessity you are accusing Clapper of lying. @konklone
46mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930