This Drone Assurance Brought to You By Northrop Grumman


Dianne Feinstein gave a speech to the World Affairs Council yesterday. As part of it (after 9:10), she gave the following reassurances regarding the oversight of drone strikes.

We have a special effort on the CIA Predator program. The staff has made 28 visits to various facilities, attended intelligence gathering, we have looked at the intelligence. The key to these, to minimize collateral damage, to go for the targeted individuals, but to have intelligence which is just as good as it can be to be totally actionable. And so the collateral damage is really greatly reduced beyond what you may read in the press. I have asked, “please please please can I release these numbers?” And the answer is [laughs] “no, they’re classified.” So that’s about as far as I could go on that.

Ah, well, that’s about as far as you can go! If the CIA tells you it can’t release its claims about civilian casualties publicly so they can be reviewed by people on the ground, so people who aren’t getting all their information from the same people pressing the trigger double check those claims, I guess that’s as far as you can go then!

What I like best is the prominent role drone manufacturer Northrop Grumman (they don’t make the Predators used in CIA’s assassination program, but they do sell drones to the CIA) had in the talk. In his introduction of her, NG’s CEO Wes Bush hailed her “absolute integrity in addressing the facts.” (Though maybe Bush was talking about DiFi’s recent misrepresentations in support of the NSA’s hoovering of telecom communications, given that NG has a big chunk of the data storage contract.)

These convenient, unverifiable “facts” on drones delivered by someone proven to misrepresent such “facts” brought to you by the drone (and wiretap) industry.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

17 Responses to This Drone Assurance Brought to You By Northrop Grumman

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @espinsegall @nancyleong Perfect? Far from it, obviously. But "could they see the future"? I'd argue they tried very hard+did amazingly well
13mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Complete list of ISIS attacks in US this holiday weekend so far: * *No word yet if the Texas alligator was working for ISIS.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @BaFana3: Day 1 : #Saudi Arabia launched a war on #Yemen to return exiled president Hadi to power. Day 101 : Saudi jets bombed Hadi's h…
32mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jessewegman Waste of time and energy
33mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV "Blank the alligators!" I'm betting that's not really the word he used.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel We just recently legalized fireworks here, because freedom. And it's not hot and dry at all or something.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Man is it great to see the Martini livery in F1 and on the Williams again. https://t.co/z8ZRds6nHi
50mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nancyleong @espinsegall I dunno, if you read the Federalist Papers, I think it shows that the Founders saw the future stunningly well.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @laRosalind Now that's a rational fear.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Has @mirriam71 landed yet??
1hreplyretweetfavorite