This Drone Assurance Brought to You By Northrop Grumman


Dianne Feinstein gave a speech to the World Affairs Council yesterday. As part of it (after 9:10), she gave the following reassurances regarding the oversight of drone strikes.

We have a special effort on the CIA Predator program. The staff has made 28 visits to various facilities, attended intelligence gathering, we have looked at the intelligence. The key to these, to minimize collateral damage, to go for the targeted individuals, but to have intelligence which is just as good as it can be to be totally actionable. And so the collateral damage is really greatly reduced beyond what you may read in the press. I have asked, “please please please can I release these numbers?” And the answer is [laughs] “no, they’re classified.” So that’s about as far as I could go on that.

Ah, well, that’s about as far as you can go! If the CIA tells you it can’t release its claims about civilian casualties publicly so they can be reviewed by people on the ground, so people who aren’t getting all their information from the same people pressing the trigger double check those claims, I guess that’s as far as you can go then!

What I like best is the prominent role drone manufacturer Northrop Grumman (they don’t make the Predators used in CIA’s assassination program, but they do sell drones to the CIA) had in the talk. In his introduction of her, NG’s CEO Wes Bush hailed her “absolute integrity in addressing the facts.” (Though maybe Bush was talking about DiFi’s recent misrepresentations in support of the NSA’s hoovering of telecom communications, given that NG has a big chunk of the data storage contract.)

These convenient, unverifiable “facts” on drones delivered by someone proven to misrepresent such “facts” brought to you by the drone (and wiretap) industry.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

17 Responses to This Drone Assurance Brought to You By Northrop Grumman

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @davidminpdx Talk to @teddysanfran (Who is now really TeddyPortland)
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MiracMagntism Absolutely, but most of ones from the right that will come already are. Don't dispirit left by trying harder to please right.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @SunsetGunShot Yeah, but I kind of like the premise!
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hillary is more concerned with swimming right than left and here are the @Democrats doing what they do https://t.co/ppBJe088OP
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @GinnyLaRoe: some sad truth right here https://t.co/hT9diSEB3N
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @dannowicki: The Arizona Republic's Steve Benson on @realDonaldTrump's call for GOP unity. More cartoons: https://t.co/pslz4r1IZF https:…
6hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @superwuster I studied 19th C stuff that was called camp-before-its-time. And he snots always said no, it can't be good before camp is cool
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @superwuster No. They're usually only good in a camp sense.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @margibb I was a civ kid! Tho so late in the Duck and Cover era it was mostly rote performance.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hey @ryanlcooper you picked a fine day to connect to Verizon https://t.co/ksNjRurhic
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @billmon1: I thought by now Clintons understood that they (and Wall Street Dem backers) ARE the Rockefeller Republicans. https://t.co/V
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ddayen Yeah, well if you make it to Phoenix, call #Grumpr
7hreplyretweetfavorite