Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

At the end of a useful Steve Coll piece on the Constitutional danger of the Administration’s unilateral decisions to kill American citizens, he argues that Congress has the ability to force the Administration to release the process by which it executes Americans with no due process publicly.

None of Obama’s legal advisers has testified similarly about what secret system and classified legal memos may exist for judging, in the case of an American citizen targeted overseas, whether and why a capture attempt may be feasible. Congress has the power to force such statements onto the public record. It must try; it is obvious by now that the Obama Administration will not volunteer them. Is “kill or capture” a policy, or are the words just a screen for politically convenient targeted killings?

As I laid out the other day, Congress has tried to ask nicely for the memos on over 10 occasions, only to be blown off by the Administration.

That’s why Dianne Feinstein’s thus far successful effort to undercut John Cornyn’s effort to mandate release of the memos is so dangerous. John Cornyn’s amendment would mandate release to six oversight committees (those overseeing Intelligence, Judiciary, and Armed Services) within a month. DiFi’s bill would require release of all intelligence related memos (which is good), but only to the Intelligence Committees, and with loopholes  that would permit the Administration to withhold a slew of their legal authorities. And any release could be delayed 6 months beyond the passage of the bill (so, if Mitt were to win, beyond the end of the Obama Administration).

There is widespread bipartisan support for releasing a real explanation of this to the public, now. Cornyn’s amendment would be an important half measure, requiring release of the Awlaki kill memo at least to the members of Congress purportedly ensuring government activities remain constitutional. And yet DiFi’s efforts undercut even that half measure.

Update: My original title, which I’ve resigned to the dustbin of over-long novels, stunk. Thankfully, Kade Ellis gave me a better one.

Twitter7Reddit0Facebook4Google+0Email

5 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @alanhkaiser What? Sorry, that's fucking nuts. Of course he's lying. @trevortimm
27mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @liferstate Oh, they're generally sorted. I need to go through & decide what to keep, what someone might want, what has too many annotations
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Nothing a few InfoOp fliers can't fix.
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @John_Hudson Well, I think I've got a solution! Primary challenge threats! It's the solution to everything!
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_Amer Yup. Didn't expect that kind! Music related? @alreinke
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @John_Hudson To be fair, kind of hard for city to deal w/100 year flood and top 10 snow year in same year. Blame Fat Al Gore.
54mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_Amer ? Am I not looking closely enough at pics? @alreinke
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_Amer Fun pic. Looks gorgeous. (Tho hot.)
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @polyparadigm Since DeVos may demand anything on threat of primaries, he should just demand they use some ... novel material.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Gaius_Publius Yes, saw them once or twice a year back in the day against the Suns. Still, been long time, had forgotten ho evil really were
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_Amer You missing someone??
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MazMHussain No. By calling white "terrorists" hate criminals, they avoid doing any network analysis. http://t.co/PyxTwyh8Bj
1hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031