Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

At the end of a useful Steve Coll piece on the Constitutional danger of the Administration’s unilateral decisions to kill American citizens, he argues that Congress has the ability to force the Administration to release the process by which it executes Americans with no due process publicly.

None of Obama’s legal advisers has testified similarly about what secret system and classified legal memos may exist for judging, in the case of an American citizen targeted overseas, whether and why a capture attempt may be feasible. Congress has the power to force such statements onto the public record. It must try; it is obvious by now that the Obama Administration will not volunteer them. Is “kill or capture” a policy, or are the words just a screen for politically convenient targeted killings?

As I laid out the other day, Congress has tried to ask nicely for the memos on over 10 occasions, only to be blown off by the Administration.

That’s why Dianne Feinstein’s thus far successful effort to undercut John Cornyn’s effort to mandate release of the memos is so dangerous. John Cornyn’s amendment would mandate release to six oversight committees (those overseeing Intelligence, Judiciary, and Armed Services) within a month. DiFi’s bill would require release of all intelligence related memos (which is good), but only to the Intelligence Committees, and with loopholes  that would permit the Administration to withhold a slew of their legal authorities. And any release could be delayed 6 months beyond the passage of the bill (so, if Mitt were to win, beyond the end of the Obama Administration).

There is widespread bipartisan support for releasing a real explanation of this to the public, now. Cornyn’s amendment would be an important half measure, requiring release of the Awlaki kill memo at least to the members of Congress purportedly ensuring government activities remain constitutional. And yet DiFi’s efforts undercut even that half measure.

Update: My original title, which I’ve resigned to the dustbin of over-long novels, stunk. Thankfully, Kade Ellis gave me a better one.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @KagroX @Cam_RollCall @nielslesniewski Nice Deflategate tie in!
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @trevortimm Actually, if she believes that, she has an ethical obligation to do so. Not that ethics are anything but situational at DOJ.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @lavenderblue27: Police Union Official Wearing ‘I Am Darren Wilson’ Wristband Starts Brawl At St. http://t.co/DkWtjFxXBK via @sharethis
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @trevortimm: Since Loretta Lynch says waterboarding is torture & "illegal," the first thing she can do as AG is prosecute the CIA. http:…
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Cops are congenital liars RT @AP Sheriffs' group complains feature in Waze traffic app endangers officers http://t.co/zwAUzn25aO
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Congrats to @lpackard for the recognition for her work for @DebDingell. http://t.co/l9mQakyHYa
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@johnson_carrie So this Sheriff Clark is pretty much a police state shit show.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @johnson_carrie @JonathanTurley But she won't. In fact Lynch is likely far more of an Exec Branch authoritarian than Holder.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Judge Rakoff, one of most independent judges, quits committee assessing DOJ just trying to retain unfair advantages. http://t.co/auGC2nEj0L
44mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @rebowers Seems as good an explanation as any.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Can rats drown and then come back to life? Five times? Asking for a friend. http://t.co/FbvNNB96FY
50mreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031