Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

At the end of a useful Steve Coll piece on the Constitutional danger of the Administration’s unilateral decisions to kill American citizens, he argues that Congress has the ability to force the Administration to release the process by which it executes Americans with no due process publicly.

None of Obama’s legal advisers has testified similarly about what secret system and classified legal memos may exist for judging, in the case of an American citizen targeted overseas, whether and why a capture attempt may be feasible. Congress has the power to force such statements onto the public record. It must try; it is obvious by now that the Obama Administration will not volunteer them. Is “kill or capture” a policy, or are the words just a screen for politically convenient targeted killings?

As I laid out the other day, Congress has tried to ask nicely for the memos on over 10 occasions, only to be blown off by the Administration.

That’s why Dianne Feinstein’s thus far successful effort to undercut John Cornyn’s effort to mandate release of the memos is so dangerous. John Cornyn’s amendment would mandate release to six oversight committees (those overseeing Intelligence, Judiciary, and Armed Services) within a month. DiFi’s bill would require release of all intelligence related memos (which is good), but only to the Intelligence Committees, and with loopholes  that would permit the Administration to withhold a slew of their legal authorities. And any release could be delayed 6 months beyond the passage of the bill (so, if Mitt were to win, beyond the end of the Obama Administration).

There is widespread bipartisan support for releasing a real explanation of this to the public, now. Cornyn’s amendment would be an important half measure, requiring release of the Awlaki kill memo at least to the members of Congress purportedly ensuring government activities remain constitutional. And yet DiFi’s efforts undercut even that half measure.

Update: My original title, which I’ve resigned to the dustbin of over-long novels, stunk. Thankfully, Kade Ellis gave me a better one.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Dianne Feinstein Agrees with Obama: Public Can’t Know Targeted Killing Legal Justification

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: If you're (justifiably) enraged about the espionage charges Iran levied against Jason Razaian, Google "Sami al-Hajj" & "Bil…
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DerekGossler @william_pitts That's it?? That looks like shit compared to the original rebuild renderings.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yeselson @imillhiser Perfect nominee?? Lynch is a terrible nominee+is a regression from Holder on pretty much every material liberal issue
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Need more pictures of Socks on acid.
54mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pedinska As you know, I am not exactly Assange's biggest fan. But he is seriously spot on here.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @APribetic @techdirt I am a one trick pony. You should know this by now!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PhilPerspective Yes. Probably the ONLY one. @onekade
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 When's Miami going to the Tundra? Cold feet worked for Suh last year. @TedLott
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Also if you want to have an ice bowl you gotta have it in outdoor stadium. @TedLott
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Um, no!-------> "Is Merely Explaining The Streisand Effect To Someone A 'Threat'?" https://t.co/H12WUGri0l via @Techdirt
1hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031