How Does a Paper Personal Journal Survive a Fire?

Michael Calderone catches CNN not disclosing that their reporting purportedly based on “a source familiar with Ambassador Stevens’ thinking” was actually working off his personal journal which they had obtained and not disclosed to the FBI team investigating his killing.

On Wednesday on his show, “Anderson Cooper 360,” Cooper told Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) that “a source familiar with Ambassador Stevens’ thinking told us that in the months before his death he talked about being worried about the never-ending security threats that he was facing in Benghazi and specifically about the rise in Islamic extremism and growing al Qaeda presence.” The source, Cooper continued, “also mentioned [Stevens] being on an al Qaeda hit list.”

But what Cooper didn’t reveal at the time was that CNN’s sourcing was tied, at least partially, to Stevens’ thinking as written in his personal journal.

In one version of their explanation CNN said they “came upon” the journal (Calderone has the transcription).

We came upon the journal through our reporting and notified the family.

In another, they describe it consisting of seven pages in a hard-bound book.

The journal consists of just seven pages of handwriting in a hard-bound book.

Several things stink about this story. First of all, consider that the attack was in Benghazi, not Tripoli, where Stevens was stationed and where he presumably kept his personal affects. So for CNN to have “come upon” it in Benghazi, it presumably would have been on Stevens’ person when he was attacked. If that’s the case, how did it survive the fire [correction, smoke] that killed Stevens?

And consider the role of this picture. CNN included in its spread of pictures of the trashed Consulate. While it clearly shows that some papers did survive, the picture immediately following shows just ashes survived the flames. Also, this image shows the papers having been ransacked; we know that the attackers got sensitive papers. How likely is it that the attackers wouldn’t have taken the Ambassador’s personal journal, even while taking everything else of interest?

That suggests two possibilities. That the journal was on Stevens’ person when he was brought to the hospital, and the person who brought him (or someone in the hospital) gave it to CNN. Or, that the attackers got the journal and one of them got it to CNN (which might explain why CNN’s language here is so sketchy).

There is, of course, one other possibility: that the journal always remained in Tripoli, at the Embassy or the Ambassador’s residence, and one of the staffers shared it with CNN.

In any case, I suspect the reason CNN didn’t reveal they had the journal at first has to do with how they found it. But that may mean they have other relevant information about the attack.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

15 Responses to How Does a Paper Personal Journal Survive a Fire?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @rhfelix Welp, there were things then I had right, and couple of minor things I was guessing on. Overall not bad, but not perfect.
24sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tinydoctor Agree. But a lot of people--especially corporations--use free speech in ways I'd prefer they don't. Not my say. @Will_Bunch
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @rhfelix: @bmaz Great job aggregating this 2 years ago. It appears your "CIA heroine" is now the star of the torture report.https://t.c…
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel So we're projecting? "Sony hack must be nation-state bc it looks like what we'd do"?
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @KimZetter: CNN: the fact that hackers stole Sony sysadmin credentials is partly why gov says they were working on behalf of NK - http:/…
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tinydoctor Think they're saying no one should be bullied into withdrawing speech. But they're withdrawing only profited speech @Will_Bunch
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tinydoctor I think that's not precisely what they're saying, but as I said, I think Sony's actions abt property. @Will_Bunch
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tuppington Both of us tweet out legal cases all the time. On a slew of issues.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tuppington So because I RT interesting court case (fr my own circuit!) I'm "hooting over unstable GOP"? You're reading EVERYTHING into it
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tinydoctor I actually think it's a property violation, not speech. @Will_Bunch
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jvagle Right. This one is so slow-mo train wreck colossal mistake in action. @quinnnorton @marciahofmann
36mreplyretweetfavorite
September 2012
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30