If Hillary Named Fat Al Gore a Foreign Terrorist Organization…

I’ve been thinking about how things would be different if Hillary Clinton named Fat Al Gore–my metaphorical name for climate change–a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

The FTO designation, you’ll recall, is the official designation that signals the US considers an entity a dangerous terrorist organization. The criteria are:

  • The organization must be foreign based.
  • The organization engages in terrorist activity or terrorism, or retains the capability and intent to engage in terrorist activity or terrorism.
  • The terrorist activity or terrorism of the organization threatens the security of United States nationals or national security of the United States.

As I see it, the “foreign based” is the only stretch here. While American carbon use is one big contributor to Fat Al Gore (in the same way American foreign policy has been one contributor to Islamic terrorism), we can ultimately claim Fat Al Gore lives in the atmosphere. That’s foreign, right?

As for terrorism? Fat Al Gore’s latest incarnation has shut down the entire Eastern Seaboard. Pictures of Sandy have inspired awe and fear even among experienced Fat Al Gore watchers. Sandy will do billions in damage, and has already killed 51 people. This is a spectacular, horrifying disaster, just as terrorist attacks are.

Perhaps you could argue Fat Al Gore is not a terrorist because it has no political goals. But I think Mother Nature probably does have some policies she’d like us to implement. Hell, we’re going to change our policies in response to Fat Al Gore one way or another, the question is when.

And clearly Fat Al Gore threatens the US–more than any other terrorist right now (and that would be true even without Frankenstorm bearing down on the East Coast).

If Hillary named Fat Al Gore an FTO, the first effect would be to criminalize financial support of Fat Al Gore. Chevron’s $2.5 million donation to defeat Democrats? Material support of terrorism. Continued subsidies to the fossil fuel industry? Material support of terrorism. We could even start arresting people pursuing policies that support Fat Al Gore and throw them away for long prison terms.

The other thing that naming Fat Al Gore an FTO would do is change our response. No longer would it be enough to respond competently (or incompetently) when Fat Al Gore attacks our country. No longer would a reactive response be enough. The goal would change, immediately and at great political cost, to–as much as possible–preventing Fat Al Gore from striking the country.

Now, if Hillary did name Fat Al Gore an FTO, you can be sure all the politicians who’ve been in the back pocket of Fat Al Gore would complain. They’d argue the designations were political.

But as I see it, that complaint was neutralized when State removed MEK from the FTO. Tom Ridge was quite happy when State used designations politically with MEK. How can he complain when designations work the other way, by holding him responsible for supporting Fat Al Gore.

One thing’s clear: our primary security apparatus–that fighting terrorism–does not now address our primary security threat–Fat Al Gore. Maybe it’s time to change that.

Tweet about this on Twitter9Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook4Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to If Hillary Named Fat Al Gore a Foreign Terrorist Organization…

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Imagine if Admin wanted to kill US ISIS member. They'd throw wall-splat of Awlaki memos w/wall-splat of IS war memos http://t.co/kg5njzG26r
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bmaz Kiki says "come visit me!" http://t.co/6t88fTyVIi
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel And then replaced by Condi. RT @shrubfree: no, [Goodell]'d be appointed viceroy of baghdad. #ageoffail
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If Goodell were to lose non-profit status AND Anheuser-Busch, THEN would he get fired?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Yes. Both true. @lynch_jen
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Coming to believe you and I are assholes. That can't be true. Can it?
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I joked a week ago but, seriously, why has no one written abt what it would do for soul of The City to lose the visible land of Adam Smith?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Jeff Bezos, space start-up. https://t.co/V6bT5ZEQhM We have drones, space, CIA, WaPo, & country's biggest book store. What could go wrong?
25mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Why are you tweeting instead of throwing the damn ball? RT @michaelwhitney: Here is my dog http://t.co/plPvYxACM4
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel First @jricole http://t.co/hTf9qa4rnR & now @bungdan http://t.co/wRHuG8IVYH making lists of contradictions w/in Obama IS strategy.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mgsledge Yes. Because no one is reporting the content of the letter. Important to make it clear Clapper will gut intent of advocate.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@matthewstoller calls 4 "Unwinding classfed state, beginning adult convo put off for 70 yrs abt nature of US power" https://t.co/k4MI1U87Ko
34mreplyretweetfavorite
October 2012
S M T W T F S
« Sep   Nov »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031