The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

In an article on the upcoming HSBC settlement, Reuters seems impressed with the fine the bank may pay for the assistance it gave to drug gangs and terrorists and other crooks by  laundering their money: $1.8 billion. It goes on to talk about “how big a signal” DOJ wants to send with this settlement.

The emphasis, of course, should be on that word “settlement.” One that will likely result in a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, in which no one gets charged, not even for the egregious conduct HSBC engaged in.

Because ultimately, Reuters is measuring this big signal by the seriousness of the criminal charges DOJ doesn’t file.

In regulatory filings, HSBC has said it could face criminal charges. But similar U.S. investigations have culminated in deferred prosecution deals, where law-enforcement agencies delay or forgo prosecuting a company if it admits wrongdoing, pays a fine and agrees to clean up its compliance systems. If the company missteps again, the Justice Department could prosecute.

[snip]

The agreements “have become a mainstay of white collar criminal law enforcement,” U.S. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said in September during an appearance at the New York City Bar Association.

“I’ve heard people criticize them and I’ve heard people praise them. DPAs have had a truly transformative effect on particular companies and, more generally, on corporate culture across the globe.”

If U.S. prosecutors agree to a deferred agreement, they still could wield a powerful legal tool by accusing the bank of laundering money.

That would be a much more serious charge than if prosecutors, in a deferred agreement, charged HSBC with criminal violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, a law that requires banks to maintain programs that root out suspicious transactions.

[snip]

A charge of money laundering would be a rare move by the Justice Department and would send a signal to other big banks that the agency is intent on cracking down on dirty money moving through the U.S. financial system. [my emphasis]

No, seriously. A legitimate report just said that DOJ will send “a signal” based on ratcheting up the seriousness of the crimes it makes disappear with one of Lanny Breuer’s flaccid DPAs. It will send “a signal” with the seriousness of the charges it will effectively excuse.

Heck. If we’re not going to really charge these banksters, why not add on murder or drug trafficking or terrorism charges, or any of the other crimes they abetted? That would really send “a signal” now, wouldn’t it, deferring even more serious charges that real people would do hard time for?

The Senate has already accused HSBC of money laundering. But mere accusations–even with promises to do better–do nothing.

No matter how serious a charge those accusations involve excusing.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Travis_Waldron Come on out, I have a spare room. it's going to be 75º today. We are temporarily the sports mecca w/SuperBowl + Phoenix Open
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Travis_Waldron I know, right? I feel bad.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @TechBrigade: Moral Mondays brings diverse groups together - http://t.co/w3TnNhlgbE http://t.co/HqchEMyYcV
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Subways will run empty overnight during snowstorm, source says http://t.co/D073wAFIsH Andrew Cuomo is a horrible human being Part 3,297
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz How is Snowmygod going there in the east? Did @Ali_Gharib survive, and what is he burning in the fireplace now?
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bsdtectr @MikeAndMike I'm telling you, it's tough!
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MasaccioEW @caidid @robertcaruso That's cause nobody goes to Glendale for anything but the game. Everything else in Scottsdale+Phoenix.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The ESPN set, with @MikeAndMike on it, is about a mile away in Scottsdale, but at 58º its just too cold to get out of bed and go down there
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Dog is thinking, "Goddamnit Alpha! It's bad enough I have to share my bed with this ... thing, but pictures?!?! On Twitter?!?!"
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @xeni Or, heck, in flyover country. Or even far worse snow in Buffalo (which admittedly can handle it better).
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ColMorrisDavis Cause Petraeus is such a woos that 2 years of the treatment Sterling has taken for 12 will is "enough"? @JasonLeopold
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: Does @SenFeinstein think former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling suffered enough?
9hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031