The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

In an article on the upcoming HSBC settlement, Reuters seems impressed with the fine the bank may pay for the assistance it gave to drug gangs and terrorists and other crooks by  laundering their money: $1.8 billion. It goes on to talk about “how big a signal” DOJ wants to send with this settlement.

The emphasis, of course, should be on that word “settlement.” One that will likely result in a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, in which no one gets charged, not even for the egregious conduct HSBC engaged in.

Because ultimately, Reuters is measuring this big signal by the seriousness of the criminal charges DOJ doesn’t file.

In regulatory filings, HSBC has said it could face criminal charges. But similar U.S. investigations have culminated in deferred prosecution deals, where law-enforcement agencies delay or forgo prosecuting a company if it admits wrongdoing, pays a fine and agrees to clean up its compliance systems. If the company missteps again, the Justice Department could prosecute.

[snip]

The agreements “have become a mainstay of white collar criminal law enforcement,” U.S. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said in September during an appearance at the New York City Bar Association.

“I’ve heard people criticize them and I’ve heard people praise them. DPAs have had a truly transformative effect on particular companies and, more generally, on corporate culture across the globe.”

If U.S. prosecutors agree to a deferred agreement, they still could wield a powerful legal tool by accusing the bank of laundering money.

That would be a much more serious charge than if prosecutors, in a deferred agreement, charged HSBC with criminal violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, a law that requires banks to maintain programs that root out suspicious transactions.

[snip]

A charge of money laundering would be a rare move by the Justice Department and would send a signal to other big banks that the agency is intent on cracking down on dirty money moving through the U.S. financial system. [my emphasis]

No, seriously. A legitimate report just said that DOJ will send “a signal” based on ratcheting up the seriousness of the crimes it makes disappear with one of Lanny Breuer’s flaccid DPAs. It will send “a signal” with the seriousness of the charges it will effectively excuse.

Heck. If we’re not going to really charge these banksters, why not add on murder or drug trafficking or terrorism charges, or any of the other crimes they abetted? That would really send “a signal” now, wouldn’t it, deferring even more serious charges that real people would do hard time for?

The Senate has already accused HSBC of money laundering. But mere accusations–even with promises to do better–do nothing.

No matter how serious a charge those accusations involve excusing.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @SpyTalker: #Oil Spill You've Never Heard of Leaking Into Gulf of #Mexico for a Decade #pollution .@zoeschlanger @Newsweek http://t.co/y
5hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @gatorhoops: Pretty good day sports-wise for #Gators. Gymnastics third straight NC, softball sweep of Georgia, and 5th straight SEC base…
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is simply an asinine comment https://t.co/1zOP1GEsf6
6hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @onlygators: THREE-PEAT: Florida #Gators gymnastics has won its third straight NCAA National Championship.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS By then the dogs will respond to both names. And prefer Beast A La Mode! @Empowlr
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @copiesofcopies Obviously! I mean even hard core crim defense attys who thought they were shady never guessed it was all this bad.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS I'll still call them Beast and A La Mode until the Squawks beat the Pats. @Empowlr
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Is there anything the vaunted FBI Crime Lab has NOT fucked up or faked over the years? Nope.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Remember, judges say govt has a "presumption of regularity." Their hair forensics--and everything else--assumed true.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @susanzalkind Thinking of IG's long work. Forensic kiosks not safe. They can't count NSLs. They don't track SIGINT source. @onekade
8hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HectorSolon He has them stored in potholes. W/everything else MI has in excess.
8hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @lhfang: I talked to Cruz, Jindal, Graham, Huckabee and others re Sen. Cotton's claim war w/Iran would end in "several days" http://t.co
8hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031