The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

In an article on the upcoming HSBC settlement, Reuters seems impressed with the fine the bank may pay for the assistance it gave to drug gangs and terrorists and other crooks by  laundering their money: $1.8 billion. It goes on to talk about “how big a signal” DOJ wants to send with this settlement.

The emphasis, of course, should be on that word “settlement.” One that will likely result in a Deferred Prosecution Agreement, in which no one gets charged, not even for the egregious conduct HSBC engaged in.

Because ultimately, Reuters is measuring this big signal by the seriousness of the criminal charges DOJ doesn’t file.

In regulatory filings, HSBC has said it could face criminal charges. But similar U.S. investigations have culminated in deferred prosecution deals, where law-enforcement agencies delay or forgo prosecuting a company if it admits wrongdoing, pays a fine and agrees to clean up its compliance systems. If the company missteps again, the Justice Department could prosecute.

[snip]

The agreements “have become a mainstay of white collar criminal law enforcement,” U.S. Assistant Attorney General Lanny Breuer said in September during an appearance at the New York City Bar Association.

“I’ve heard people criticize them and I’ve heard people praise them. DPAs have had a truly transformative effect on particular companies and, more generally, on corporate culture across the globe.”

If U.S. prosecutors agree to a deferred agreement, they still could wield a powerful legal tool by accusing the bank of laundering money.

That would be a much more serious charge than if prosecutors, in a deferred agreement, charged HSBC with criminal violations of the Bank Secrecy Act, a law that requires banks to maintain programs that root out suspicious transactions.

[snip]

A charge of money laundering would be a rare move by the Justice Department and would send a signal to other big banks that the agency is intent on cracking down on dirty money moving through the U.S. financial system. [my emphasis]

No, seriously. A legitimate report just said that DOJ will send “a signal” based on ratcheting up the seriousness of the crimes it makes disappear with one of Lanny Breuer’s flaccid DPAs. It will send “a signal” with the seriousness of the charges it will effectively excuse.

Heck. If we’re not going to really charge these banksters, why not add on murder or drug trafficking or terrorism charges, or any of the other crimes they abetted? That would really send “a signal” now, wouldn’t it, deferring even more serious charges that real people would do hard time for?

The Senate has already accused HSBC of money laundering. But mere accusations–even with promises to do better–do nothing.

No matter how serious a charge those accusations involve excusing.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to The New Measure of DOJ Seriousness: The Charges It Defers

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz A great polygrapher is hard to find; Volume #6,392
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox You state teh obvious. Have you anything else, laddie?
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ggreenwald @headhntr It'd be really awesome if you guys encouraged people to do USAF warrant canaries in advance of that.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox @DLind In one small measure of fairness, I think Costello might have been able to play guitar a touch better than Tom Petty at first.
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joshgerstein <head desk>
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Listen here, that dude played guitar worse than I did at the time, and I completely SUCKED!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DLind Call em as I see em. Or, in this case, saw them.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Where in @ScottGreenfield blows some hot truth on journalistic nimrods cackling about "tough" DOJ hammer on Cleveland http://t.co/Ip4yMLyiSe
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz I saw him not long after debut of his first album. He couldn't play guitar better than an inert mannequin could. https://t.co/oecTG4sYno
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV NBD. Just a hovercraft going by. http://t.co/C1zCDI1Xh8
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen A very good question. I'm not even sure I have a hotel room, much less swank dinner reservations. @bmaz
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@AllThingsHLS Surely you're not suggesting the FBI is held to a higher standard of competence than the Senate?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031