How Treasury Justified a $13 Million Smaller SCB Settlement than NYS

Back in August, Standard Chartered Bank settled with New York’s Superintendent of Financial Services for laundering Iran and other sanctioned countries’ money; that settlement was for $340 million.

Today, Treasury announced its settlement for the same fraud. Today’s settlement–which includes “U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the Department of Justice’s National Security Division, the Department of Justice’s Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering Section and the New York County District Attorney’s Office; as well as orders involving the Board of Governors with the cooperation of the UK’s Financial Services Authority,”–is for $327 million, of which Treasury’s take is $132 million.

When SCB settled with SFS, it admitted that its fraud had covered $250 billion in transactions (thus refuting the dubious work done by Promotory Financial).

The New York State Department of Financial Services (“DFS”) and Standard Chartered Bank (“Bank”) have reached an agreement to settle the matters raised in the DFS Order dated August 6, 2012. The parties have agreed that the conduct at issue involved transactions of at least $250 billion. [my emphasis]

But today’s Treasury settlement shrinks that claim this way:

While SCB’s omission of information affected approximately 60,000 transactions related to Iran totaling $250 billion, the vast majority of these transactions do not appear to have been violations of the Iranian Transaction Regulations, 31 C.F.R. Part 560 due to authorizations and exemptions which were in place at the time.

Treasury would have us believe that SCB engaged in fraud to hide Iran’s involvement of money transfers even with legitimate transfers.

Maybe that’s right. Without a lot more transparency, we’ll just have to take Treasury’s word for the claim that the vast majority of money Iran was transferring up to 2008 didn’t fall under sanctions in place at the time, as dubious as that is.

Now, none of this addresses the scope of the violations involving other sanctioned countries, such as the $96 million transfered to Sudan described in the Treasury settlement but not the SFS one. Nor does it address the $243,500 it transfered for a designated drug kingpin, Connect Telecom, in 2011, after SCB had already started discussing these issues with “certain law enforcement agencies” and NYS.

It also relies on this claim:

OFAC had not issued a penalty notice of Finding of Violation against SCB in the five years preceding the apparent violations.

To make SCB look compliant, even though the Fed had been in discussions with SCB about these violations starting in 2004.

And of course, it includes this language:

Without this Agreement constituting an admission or denial by SCB of any allegation made or implied by OFAC in connection with this matter…

In spite of SCB’s earlier admissions to SFS.

Again, SCB has already admitted to some of this fraud. But Treasury has gone out of its way to not only not require an admission, but to retroactively label hundreds of billions of dollars in fraudulent transactions kosher.

It’s really time to start asking why that is.

Tweet about this on Twitter5Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook6Google+0Email to someone

2 Responses to How Treasury Justified a $13 Million Smaller SCB Settlement than NYS

  • 1
  • 2

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @bsdtectr VERY MUCH in relevant discussion. As is Deep Purple Live In Japan. Also, way up there is Bless It's Pointed Little Head by JA.
33mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz If you disagree, use the "Yo App" to try to contact me. Cause, you know, I will be monitoring that. #OrNot
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz May be just me, but there may never have been two better live rock+roll albums than Rolling Stones Get Yer Ya Yas Out and J Geils Full House
39mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Kiki, wistfully pining away for her new best friend, @jilliancyork http://t.co/9cXhpQ4ku3
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox @emptywheel Quit guessing and man up you wimp!
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TorEkelandPC To me, battle should be abt 2nd Amendment right to bear drones and bear hacks.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @DougWilliams85: I'm just happy that my father never accepted that his only son would have to work twice as hard to deserve simple equal…
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @pwnallthethings: @csoghoian "On devices running IOS 8, your personal data is stored in our cloud, so law enforcement no longer needs to…
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian That only applies if THEY have the phone, the cops?
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Just in time for USAF, I might add. http://t.co/n0578eXsTt
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In addition to being great marketing this is a nice list of the things Apples has already been asked for. http://t.co/n0578eXsTt
4hreplyretweetfavorite
December 2012
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031