Al-Haramain Will Not Appeal 9th Circuit Decision Immunizing Illegal Wiretapping

The single best chance to hold the government accountable for its illegal wiretapping, the al-Haramain suit, is over.

Our goal was for the judiciary to rule that the president may not disregard an act of Congress in the name of national security.

[snip]

Ironically, although we had sought a judicial pronouncement that the president may not violate FISA, the 9th Circuit instead proclaimed that he can get away with it.

[snip]

We have decided not to challenge the 9th Circuit’s ruling in the U.S. Supreme Court. We feel that, given the Supreme Court’s current ideological tilt, it is better to leave other courts free to disagree with the 9th Circuit than to risk a bad ruling by the current Supreme Court.

The Al-Haramain case is over. Perhaps someday another court will adjudicate the scope of the president’s domestic wiretapping powers in a national climate less charged by post-9/11 fears.

With these words, Jon Eisenberg, the lawyer representing al-Haramain in its suit against the government for violating FISA, publicly described his decision not to appeal the 9th Circuit’s finding that the government is immune from penalties for violating FISA.

The resolution of the al-Haramain case has been little noted in the halls of DC. But it really underlies the entire debate about the FISA Amendments Act extension.

Because as shitty as the law just renewed is, the government also now knows that they don’t even have to follow that law. They are effectively immune from the law.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

7 Responses to Al-Haramain Will Not Appeal 9th Circuit Decision Immunizing Illegal Wiretapping

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV I'm being stalked by a panther. https://t.co/BwyQteGsxR
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @GuantanamoAndy: My photo: I speak at Florida protest against #Guantanamo on Jan. 9, outside gates of Southcom https://t.co/IlixI4gMRR
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mla1396 It's the unclassified version. The secret stuff no one can see got taken out.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HinaShamsi That's why you're the litigator and I'm the one stirring up trouble via other means.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HinaShamsi Think you should write nice note to Comey saying you're glad he likes new redress procedures & where he'd like to be sued next.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel This sentence describes how China is using bulk data in a CI function but doesn't describe it coming from OPM. https://t.co/EwZR5YE6Uy
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HinaShamsi Eventually ACLU will save us by helping get guns out of hands of terrorists (& innocents). But ingrate FBI can't offer thanks
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Here's how Clapper's testimony describes Juniper backdoor. https://t.co/YLixhxrhpC In infrastructure section. https://t.co/ufbSnGyrjE
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey Does that presume best defense for domestic networks same as best defense overseas?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Susan_Hennessey Q on your piece: Shouldn't all the fractions for Rogers time be split again, to account for CyberComm?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Yes! My @GatorsBB tickets just arrived. Only ten days until opening night! #NumberOneInAllPolls https://t.co/v8d1LxYqyp
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Pachacutec_ Why does Warren keep making that smear abt a BK law that let banks take houses from millions? @davidbrockdc
2hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031