The Dianne Feinstein-Jose Rodriguez Grudge Match

It cannot be sheer coincidence that Dianne Feinstein released two letters to acting CIA Director Michael Morell just hours before WaPo published yet another fact-free defense of torture from Jose Rodriguez.

In addition to demanding proof for assertions Morell made–after DiFi sent her first letter–in a letter to CIA employees about Zero Dark Thirty…

In your December 21, 2012, statement to CIA employees regarding the film, Zero Dark Thirty, you state that “the film creates the strong impression that enhanced interrogation techniques” were “the key to finding Bin Ladin” and that this impression “is false.” However, you went on to refer to multiple streams of intelligence that led CIA analysts to conclude that Bin Ladin was hiding in Abbottabad and stated that “Some came from detainees subjected to enhanced techniques, but there were many other sources as well. And, importantly, whether enhanced interrogation techniques were the only timely and effective way to obtain information from those detainees, as the film suggests, is a matter of debate that cannot and never will be definitively resolved.”

DiFi also noted (in her first letter) that the false assertions in the film tracked public claims made by Michael Hayden and Rodriguez.

As you know, the film depicts CIA officers repeatedly torturing detainees. The film then credits CIA detainees subjected to coercive interrogation techniques as providing critical lead information on the courier that led to the UBL compound. While this information is incorrect, it is consistent with public statements made by former Director of the CIA Counterterrorism Center, Jose Rodriguez, and former CIA Director Michael Hayden.

DiFi sent her first letter December 19. Morell made his incorrect claims two days later. Then DiFi demanded he back his claims on Monday.

Then here we are, on Thursday, with Rodriguez both denying the brutal aspects of the torture depicted in the movie resemble what the CIA did, while claiming (as DiFi predicted) that torture was central to finding Osama bin Laden.

I guess this is why the name of Jane Harman–who may have been terrible on a number of points but pushed back on the Bush Administration’s torture regime–got floated in the last few days as CIA Director, instead of Morell, who had previously been a lock?

In addition to preventing Morell from officially directing the CIA, DiFi does have another way to respond to this insubordination: to release her long report showing that torture not only didn’t work, but did resemble the brutal scenes in the movie.

Mind you, she’s going to face an increasingly fierce battle over classification. Does CIA retain primary classification authority for the program–in which case they’ll fight her? Or does Obama–and will the CIA’s godfather, John Brennan, allow the report to be released?

In any case, this seems a clear moment when DiFi’s authority (indeed, when Congress’ authority) on an issue on which she has been productive, is being challenged head on.

We shall see whether the Congressional overseer or the torturer wins this battle.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

13 Responses to The Dianne Feinstein-Jose Rodriguez Grudge Match

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Grapefruit. It's the New Harbinger of Spring. (Steal that!)
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Grapefruit fragranced $$ changed hands. It's sunny (and warm, if you're from either CO or MI). Of course they're boozing.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @granick FYI, also related. https://t.co/JBHbcqHjzt Taking Minimization Procedures out of FISC hands. BC FISC is too strict.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Then about the Deviant Dales, then... It could be your special take on the story...
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 If you're working on THAT can you figure out how much more Deviant Dales we get in the deal?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Perrin? The one I was wondering why you hadn't already reported on?!?!
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @granick But James Clapper assured me something like that could never ever happen. Surely you're not sugges-- wait.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sbagen Hey, you're on a win streak. Run with it.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sbagen Also, how could MI voters agree w/petitioners "experts" if the "experts" didn't testify until 9 years after the vote?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MazMHussain So you're assuring us that the Paul Wolfowitzes of the world have finally gotten the distinction straight? You sure?
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang Really? That's nutty. Not vegan either tho occasionally choose it. Just wonder why vegans don't just eat like most of world
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @granick It can't look at phone dragnet--no CT purpose. It CAN however be handed info abt leaks under CISA.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031