The Seduction of John Brennan’s “Moral Rectitude”


As has been floated over the last few days, Obama will reportedly appoint John Brennan CIA Director later today.

FWIW, having John Brennan in a position where he will be subject to Congressional oversight–rather than the oversight-free and more expansive position he’s in now–might not be an entirely bad thing. And after the DiFi-Jose Rodriguez smackdown, I’m not sad to see Morell get passed over, because I don’t think he has sufficient independence from people like Rodriguez.

Nevertheless, this appointment no doubt will lead to (already has) a bunch of people suggesting John Brennan will bring new order to the drone program.

I’m actually far more worried about Brennan’s control over other programs, particularly profiling Americans (though NCTC owns much of that task now). Remember, in addition to having ties to torture, Brennan was in charge of profiling for Dick Cheney’s illegal wiretap program. And he’s the guy who decided it’d be great to give the NCTC unfettered access to any federal database. This man loves data mining, and we should expect to see more of it from the CIA.

But I’m amused that people believe–based on anonymous claims by Brennan supporters–that he’ll bring order to the drone program. Such belief, it seems to me, overlooks Brennan’s actions in favor of anonymous comments.

Brennan was purportedly putting more order to the program. Until Mitt lost, and then he stalled that effort and broke what rules are said to govern the program.

Brennan was purportedly opposed to signature strikes. Until he approved them for use in Yemen.

Brennan has had control over all aspects of the drone program for 8 months. But the drone program is, if anything, accelerating again.

And remember, Brennan is a liar. A proven liar on this and a number of other issues. As well as a key instigator for the self-interested leaking the Administration would criminally punish coming from others. He spends a great deal of energy telling useful but not factually accurate stories to spin the Administration’s counterterrorism programs.

So I can’t help but think the people hailing his “moral rectitude” have been seduced by an old spook. Because every story that claims Brennan has some kind of higher ethics or a plan to put order to our out-of-control CT programs is either followed–or has the proof within itself–that the moral rectitude is the PR, whereas the embrace of unchecked power seems to be backed by his actions.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

6 Responses to The Seduction of John Brennan’s “Moral Rectitude”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @ScottGreenfield Agree. That said, Noble+Clark's affidavit seemed more suited to a §1983 civil case than a Grand Jury for a crime case.
bmaz RT @ScottGreenfield: The DA sought to bury this w/ a Saturday night release. Don't let it happen. This needs to be known.
bmaz Tamir Rice: All Relevant Evidence: Is Prosecutor McGinty pulling a Bob McCulloch like Grand Jury sham? Yes.
bmaz @DougHaller Fine, let's go with the "get someone else" option. Graham is a terrible game coach.
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor Also, you understand FBI is part of DOJ+what you are referring to is definitional, not operative, right?
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor Oh, you graduated now huh. Well you keep at it. And dissent all you want, that is the correct reading.
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor But, hey, you are a law student, I am sure you have it all covered.
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor Well, except every professional in criminal law, including the DOJ disagree with that proposition.
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor There are certain specified instances it covers. A man with a gun is not one of them, see e.g. Roof case
bmaz @jujueyeball @mattfwood @dangillmor Um, the pertinent statute is 18 USC §2331. It does NOT provide for domestic terrorism. Even DOJ says so.
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Returning to reality sucks.
January 2013
« Dec   Feb »