Obama’s Treasury Department: Our Sanctions Regime Is SEKRIT

Screen shot 2013-02-20 at 12.48.34 PMTreasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Controljust sent out its invite for a symposium helping the Financial Industry learn about how to comply with sanctions. The symposium will include the following:

The Financial Symposium will feature a Keynote Address by OFAC Director Adam Szubin and presentations by key OFAC personnel on topics such as:

  • Changes to the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations, NDAA and CISADA
  • Enforcement guidelines and enforcement actions
  • SDN List updates and information on the designation process
  • Securities and Insurance
  • Licensing procedures and guidance
  • Compliance with U.S. economic and trade sanctions

In addition to formal presentations, OFAC staff will be available throughout the day for individual questions and ad hoc roundtable discussion on issues unique to the financial industry.

It’s actually fairly important that the sanctions regime be well-publicized. Not only does it help ensure compliance from any entity that might be considered liable. But that’s what gives it legitimacy: not just the fact that sanctions and their rationale appear well thought out (if you believe Iranians should have no access to medical devices and dental equipment, that is), but also that sanctions are somewhat fairly applied (which they’re not).

Apparently, Obama’s Treasury Department doesn’t see it this way.

 The event is closed to press.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

7 Responses to Obama’s Treasury Department: Our Sanctions Regime Is SEKRIT

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @normative To clarify, proper usage is GIgabytes of Metadata & Miscellaneous Information Electronic (GIMMIE)?@csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob What qualifies as "bulk," you mean? Gotta get a warrant for 500G hard drive... @normative @csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @normative Ooh! Nice! You're almost as clever as Sensenbrenner. @csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @toxic Thank you so much! (I'm tired...)
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel The Section 215 Rap Sheet https://t.co/b9lvBI1dae (Reupping bc I accidentally published before its time)
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @cgberube: @RadioFreeTom the same people who believe NSA is capable of tapping their comms r same who believe govt can't even fix pothol…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian In fact I propose we call 215 the "Gigabytes of Metadata & Other Electronic Information" Provision, per IG Report @KenDilanianAP
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian In fact, rather than using the IC's nonsensical definition for bulk, as USAF does, let's limit it by Gigs. @KenDilanianAP
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian Me, I just want a sense of how much a Gig is in privacy terms bc that's the unit 215 orders operate on. @KenDilanianAP
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Also, first you'd have to let the govt have encrypted convos with that intermediary.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 I have another proposal: The press keeping reporting secrets until the secret people stop acting like crazy people.
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel The sound the door of FISC makes when Richard Burr and Mitch McConnell have missed reauthorization deadline. https://t.co/55TUY15JR8
36mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728