The Folks Who Brought You Military Detention in the NDAA Are Rewriting the AUMF

Yesterday, the Senate Armed Services Committee announced a hearing to revisit the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force. In addition to a bunch of DOD figures (but not the recently departed Jeh Johnson, the DOD-connected person who said the most interesting things about the AUMF), it’ll have (I’ve linked their most salient comments on the AUMF):

Rosa Brooks, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center

Geoffrey Corn, Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law

Jack Goldsmith, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch

Charles Stimson, Manager, National Security Law Program, The Heritage Foundation

Curiously, John Bellinger who (as far as I understand) started the discussion of a new AUMF is not slated to testify. Also note that the Deputy Director of Special Operations for Counterterrorism will testify, but no one from CIA is scheduled to; while JSOC can operate under the President’s inherent authority, it likely prefers the legal cover of an AUMF (and therefore may be one of the entities pushing for an AUMF that matches reality on the ground).

Politico reports that this hearing is more than speculative: Levin and no-longer-SASC-Ranking-Member-but-he-might-as-well-be John McCain are planning to rewrite the AUMF, with help from Bob Corker, Dick Durbin, and Lindsey “all detainees must be military” Graham.

And if the inclusion of Graham in that group doesn’t scare you, remember that this crowd is substantively the same one that enshrined military detention in 2012’s NDAA. While that effort might be regarded as “reasonable” Carl Levin and John McCain’s attempt to present something more reasonable than House Armed Services Committee Buck McKeon was pushing for, and while the NDAA originally included exceptions for US citizens, in the event, the White House pushed Carl Levin to effectively rubber stamp its claims to unlimited authority, including detaining (or killing) US citizens.

And if that doesn’t have you worried enough about this effort, consider this quote, which mocks the contributions Rand Paul or Ted Cruz might make to this debate.

“Can you imagine what Paul or Cruz would do with this?” said one top Democratic aide. “It could be a disaster. And it would be worse in the House.”

As a threshold matter, a top aide who can’t distinguish between Paul’s more heartfelt libertarianism from Cruz’ authoritarianism pretending to be libertarianism is a concern. But to call the influence of both as “a disaster” is troubling.

Ultimately, though, what is likely to happen with this debate is that all players will be unwilling to discuss openly what we’ve actually been doing in the name of war against al Qaeda, up to and including waging war in the “homeland.”  That’s one thing the 2001 AUMF was written to exclude. And I can almost guarantee you, it’s an authority the President — and the top Democratic aides who mock Rand Paul — will want to preserve.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

2 Responses to The Folks Who Brought You Military Detention in the NDAA Are Rewriting the AUMF

  • 1
  • 2
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @ArifCRafiq: Guys in the back look scared. https://t.co/s80kVDeuiA
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ryanjreilly Current income. How much did not prosecuting banks pay off for him?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bsonenstein Had to explain how our treatment of blacks has long been an ideological black eye to adult American last week. She had no idea.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MicahZenko: State Dept on Yemeni civilians killed by US-backed Saudi airstrikes: "That’s really for the Saudi Govt to speak to." http:/…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ZaidJilani He's been in the same field for over a decade. @gzornick
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ZackPohl: Nike to pay college lots of money so players will wear their clothes while playing for free.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @gzornick And his old job was...?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Johngcole No one has really even started, being busy with Cosby reporting. So the world is your sub.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @we_are_toast Not just abt non-voters: also abt gerry-mandering and ALEC $$. @ThePlumLineGS @GottaLaff
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @empiricalerror: Cyber Wars Episode I: The Phantom Memo https://t.co/JHrmNIssnU Signed July 2nd, finally surfaces July 7th. #OPM #eQIP
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Feels like lesson should instead be swing states outside of South adopting southern strategies to deny voter access. https://t.co/3w0VXPvYUr
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ShawnMusgrave But the CIA is happy to launder info to them anyway. (Still owe you that ref, huh?)
3hreplyretweetfavorite