The Folks Who Brought You Military Detention in the NDAA Are Rewriting the AUMF

Yesterday, the Senate Armed Services Committee announced a hearing to revisit the 2001 Authorization to Use Military Force. In addition to a bunch of DOD figures (but not the recently departed Jeh Johnson, the DOD-connected person who said the most interesting things about the AUMF), it’ll have (I’ve linked their most salient comments on the AUMF):

Rosa Brooks, Professor of Law, Georgetown University Law Center

Geoffrey Corn, Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law

Jack Goldsmith, Professor of Law, Harvard Law School

Kenneth Roth, Executive Director, Human Rights Watch

Charles Stimson, Manager, National Security Law Program, The Heritage Foundation

Curiously, John Bellinger who (as far as I understand) started the discussion of a new AUMF is not slated to testify. Also note that the Deputy Director of Special Operations for Counterterrorism will testify, but no one from CIA is scheduled to; while JSOC can operate under the President’s inherent authority, it likely prefers the legal cover of an AUMF (and therefore may be one of the entities pushing for an AUMF that matches reality on the ground).

Politico reports that this hearing is more than speculative: Levin and no-longer-SASC-Ranking-Member-but-he-might-as-well-be John McCain are planning to rewrite the AUMF, with help from Bob Corker, Dick Durbin, and Lindsey “all detainees must be military” Graham.

And if the inclusion of Graham in that group doesn’t scare you, remember that this crowd is substantively the same one that enshrined military detention in 2012’s NDAA. While that effort might be regarded as “reasonable” Carl Levin and John McCain’s attempt to present something more reasonable than House Armed Services Committee Buck McKeon was pushing for, and while the NDAA originally included exceptions for US citizens, in the event, the White House pushed Carl Levin to effectively rubber stamp its claims to unlimited authority, including detaining (or killing) US citizens.

And if that doesn’t have you worried enough about this effort, consider this quote, which mocks the contributions Rand Paul or Ted Cruz might make to this debate.

“Can you imagine what Paul or Cruz would do with this?” said one top Democratic aide. “It could be a disaster. And it would be worse in the House.”

As a threshold matter, a top aide who can’t distinguish between Paul’s more heartfelt libertarianism from Cruz’ authoritarianism pretending to be libertarianism is a concern. But to call the influence of both as “a disaster” is troubling.

Ultimately, though, what is likely to happen with this debate is that all players will be unwilling to discuss openly what we’ve actually been doing in the name of war against al Qaeda, up to and including waging war in the “homeland.”  That’s one thing the 2001 AUMF was written to exclude. And I can almost guarantee you, it’s an authority the President — and the top Democratic aides who mock Rand Paul — will want to preserve.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

2 Responses to The Folks Who Brought You Military Detention in the NDAA Are Rewriting the AUMF

  • 1
  • 2
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @LauraClawson If he did what we assume he did does Indiv A have the right to his or her privacy given the extortion?
1mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Cool! The periscope works. http://t.co/7LAHYao2C3
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Cool! The periscope works. http://t.co/87LcCZjtXw
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Not given the other rumors out there, no.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Misconduct against Indiv A happened "years earlier" when Hastert and A discussed it in 2010. Hastert was teacher/coach until 1981.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Okay. Time far a 'Mericun sub now. http://t.co/xTm9LzUJTu
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bungdan There have been questions raised during past scandals.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Walshman23 High school teacher and coach. Both of which indictment mentions.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @bungdan Yes, and there have been past allegations abt Hastert that would be rather alarming for a coach, which indictment mentions.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Median income in Yorkville is $83,059. Indiv A was making 5 times that from his or her Hastert bribes.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @georgemaschke Already mentioned that.
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel There are 17,000 people in Yorkville, IL. Indiv A is one. Indiv A's $450K/year income from Hastert presumably makes Indiv A stick out there.
25mreplyretweetfavorite