Press Freedom: It Depends on What the Meaning of the Word “Is” Is

As we get further away from last week’s what’s-new-is-old counterterrorism speech, I’m increasingly convinced all that happened was the Administration yoked the word “continuing” onto the word “imminent” and declared an entirely new standard that just happens to replicate the existing one.

Which is why I think this detail, from Politico’s leaks-about-a-meeting-about-leaks story, is the most telling I’ve seen on the Holder meeting.

“The guidelines require a balance between law enforcement and freedom of the press, and we all argued that the balance was out of kilter, with the national security and law enforcement interests basically overwhelming the public’s right to get information,” one journalist at the meeting said. “The language concerning ‘aiding and abetting’ comes out of the Privacy [Protection] Act, and they discussed trying to revise that language so that reporters don’t need to be defined as co-conspirators in order to execute search warrants.”

This is a reference to part of the Privacy Act that prohibits the government from seizing media work product unless it is connected to a crime (see pages 5 ff for how it affected the James Rosen warrant application). After claiming Rosen was aiding and abetting a violation of the Espionage Act and therefore his emails could be seized, the FBI then said that since he was potentially criminally liable, he should not get notice. In other words, the aiding abetting was an investigative tactic DOJ used to get around protections put into place just for someone like Rosen.

And DOJ’s solution for abusing a protection meant to protect someone like Rosen is apparently to simply redefine the law, so it can overcome those protections without having to accuse Rosen of being a criminal.

The outcome would remain the same; DOJ would just avoid saying mean things about people associated with powerful media outlets.

And note, from the reports I’ve seen thus far, none of these crack journalists seem to have suggested to DOJ that even the way it was using the Espionage Act to go after sources (many of whom are whistleblowers) is a dangerous misapplication of statute, just like calling James Rosen a co-conspirator is. That is, DOJ’s use of the Espionage Act to give the clearance system more teeth than it was meant to have seems to have escaped these media representatives’ notice.

Ah well. If they had raised DOJ’s abuse of the Espionage Act, DOJ would just do what they appear to intend to do with its abuse of Privacy Act restrictions: redefine the terms and proceed as they had been.

Tweet about this on Twitter8Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook5Google+1Email to someone

7 Responses to Press Freedom: It Depends on What the Meaning of the Word “Is” Is

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @smsaideman @DaveedGR Well Happy Birthday Mr. Saideman. Have a great one. And a couple of beers.
31sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Assume he's been and gone--no way they'd bring him in during shelling, he might see war crimes. So...they used cease fire for him.
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Presumably, Israel used cease fire (such as it existed) to get Wolf Blitzer into a tunnel, correct?
21mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @MoonofA: New on MoA: NBCNews Buries Its Own Journalist's Eyes, Modifies Gaza Story - http://t.co/3XnNRf3b9u
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ViscResponse My MillaniaLab is too old to get into the egress window where they've formed the mother ship. He can have what escapes.
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joanwalsh @Salon Yes, indeed.
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TyreJim @sarahjeong Seconded.
43mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Before they were #TerrorTunnels, they were food and medicine tunnels that were needed to get around collective punishment.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @wheeliesmom I'm not. I said they would never do it.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AthertonKD Dunno if thta's worse than losing $9B in cash in Iraq, though. Just ... bad. @SIGARHQ
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ryanjreilly: 4th Circuit trolls Scalia! http://t.co/43L4eivavW
56mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV They'll never do it, but Israel could score big pub rel pts by allowing in food and medical supplies when closing tunnels. Was orig reason.
57mreplyretweetfavorite