65 2010 House Freshmen Re-Authorized PATRIOT with No Notice of Section 215 Dragnet

The White Paper claims that the Section 215 dragnet is legal, in large part, because Congress has twice extended the PATRIOT Act without changing the terms of Section 215. A key of part that argument rests on the Administration’s claim that it gave notice to Congress about the dragnet.

Moreover, information concerning the use of Section 215 to collect telephony metadata in bulk was made available to all Members of Congress, and Congress reauthorized Section 215 without change after this information was provided. It is significant to the legal analysis of the statute that Congress was on notice of this activity and of the source of its legal authority when the statute was reauthorized.

But as I noted, the White Paper actually suggests that a big group of Congressmen — most of the 93 members elected in 2010 — got no notice. While the Administration provided House Intelligence Chair Mike Rogers with a description of the program, he appears not to have invited all members of the House to read it, as Dianne Feinstein invited all members of the Senate to do.

Since I wrote that post, Justin Amash confirmed that his class did not get an invitation to read the notice.

Less than two weeks ago, the Obama administration released previously classified documents regarding ‪#‎NSA‬’s bulk collection programs and indicated that two of these documents had been made available to all Members of Congress prior to the vote on reauthorization of the Patriot Act. I can now confirm that the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence did NOT, in fact, make the 2011 document available to Representatives in Congress, meaning that the large class of Representatives elected in 2010 did not receive either of the now declassified documents detailing these programs.

I double checked via Twitter, and Amash confirmed that Rogers just never invited the House to read it.

Just 7 2010 freshmen (Sandy Adams, Trey Gowdy, Tim Griffin, Joe Heck, Tom Marino, Ben Quayle, and Dennis Ross) were on either the House Intelligence Committee or the House Judiciary Committee at the time, and therefore presumably had the opportunity to learn about the dragnet there.

The PATRIOT Act Reauthorization passed by a broad 250-153 margin.

But by my calculation, 65 of those yes votes were freshmen who had never had opportunity to learn about the dragnet. Many of them would have presumably voted to reauthorize it knowing about the dragnet (and Mike Pompeo, who played a key role in defeating Amash-Conyers, was a non-vote who would clearly vote yes). But in theory at least Mike Rogers chose not to inform a sufficiently large group that it could have swung the vote.

The Administration claims it informed Congress about the dragnet. But whether acting on his own or at the behest of the Administration, Mike Rogers left a sufficiently large group in the dark so as to negate the validity of that claim.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @ionacraig: With 12 @USNavy warships in Yemen's waters time for America to prove it's not a Saudi lackey and to check & allow food shipm…
3mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV US Shocked That Islamic State Capable of Military Training https://t.co/EFcKTp9vOh
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @froomkin: Excellent analysis of latest cyber & surveillance moves in Congress by @emptywheel http://t.co/8opr4efw4w via @Salon
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @robertcaruso Fair enough. And I guess your average Congressman MIGHT argue that bc Snowden leaked they have to hide companies under FOIA.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @AllThingsHLS: Perhaps it's time to stop thinking of ISIS as a religiously motivated terror group?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @robertcaruso Bollocks. It has little to do w/Snowden & everything to do w/broad usage requirements under bill.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @NSArchive: Title page of 10 oldest classified docs maintained at the US Army Chemical Materials Activity (CMA), 1947-1987 #FOIA http://…
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Congress ABSOLUTELY negligent in approving intelligence sharing w/o asking for proof it would work/is necessary. But why are journos, too?
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Yet another "news" report that claims CISA would "combat cyberattacks." http://t.co/c6gSGZfWN5 Prove it, journalist!
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @dcbigjohn Awesome pics. Looks like a good time.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @xbradtc Baltimore officials have already admitted that the knife he was carrying was legal. No legitimate grounds for arrest. Nor killing.
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @xbradtc Under Wardlow, a minimal Terry stop probably. The type of conduct that obviously occurred here, not even close.
6hreplyretweetfavorite