65 2010 House Freshmen Re-Authorized PATRIOT with No Notice of Section 215 Dragnet

The White Paper claims that the Section 215 dragnet is legal, in large part, because Congress has twice extended the PATRIOT Act without changing the terms of Section 215. A key of part that argument rests on the Administration’s claim that it gave notice to Congress about the dragnet.

Moreover, information concerning the use of Section 215 to collect telephony metadata in bulk was made available to all Members of Congress, and Congress reauthorized Section 215 without change after this information was provided. It is significant to the legal analysis of the statute that Congress was on notice of this activity and of the source of its legal authority when the statute was reauthorized.

But as I noted, the White Paper actually suggests that a big group of Congressmen — most of the 93 members elected in 2010 — got no notice. While the Administration provided House Intelligence Chair Mike Rogers with a description of the program, he appears not to have invited all members of the House to read it, as Dianne Feinstein invited all members of the Senate to do.

Since I wrote that post, Justin Amash confirmed that his class did not get an invitation to read the notice.

Less than two weeks ago, the Obama administration released previously classified documents regarding ‪#‎NSA‬’s bulk collection programs and indicated that two of these documents had been made available to all Members of Congress prior to the vote on reauthorization of the Patriot Act. I can now confirm that the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence did NOT, in fact, make the 2011 document available to Representatives in Congress, meaning that the large class of Representatives elected in 2010 did not receive either of the now declassified documents detailing these programs.

I double checked via Twitter, and Amash confirmed that Rogers just never invited the House to read it.

Just 7 2010 freshmen (Sandy Adams, Trey Gowdy, Tim Griffin, Joe Heck, Tom Marino, Ben Quayle, and Dennis Ross) were on either the House Intelligence Committee or the House Judiciary Committee at the time, and therefore presumably had the opportunity to learn about the dragnet there.

The PATRIOT Act Reauthorization passed by a broad 250-153 margin.

But by my calculation, 65 of those yes votes were freshmen who had never had opportunity to learn about the dragnet. Many of them would have presumably voted to reauthorize it knowing about the dragnet (and Mike Pompeo, who played a key role in defeating Amash-Conyers, was a non-vote who would clearly vote yes). But in theory at least Mike Rogers chose not to inform a sufficiently large group that it could have swung the vote.

The Administration claims it informed Congress about the dragnet. But whether acting on his own or at the behest of the Administration, Mike Rogers left a sufficiently large group in the dark so as to negate the validity of that claim.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @gregorydjohnsen Q: can you think of any instance of "side payment" strike? Something done for Hadi or even KSA as part of drone permission?
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Esquiring In Tsarnaev trial. Lots of journos live tweeting it. https://t.co/ZczkDdwOjn
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Dear defense attorneys. The government just asserted that AT&T location data is not a reliable indicator of where their AT&T phones are.
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JimArmstrongWBZ: C: if you had training, you would've known AT&T data is not a reliable indicator of where a phone is at any time. G: I…
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Maybe if I combine it w/ill-informed opinion abt terrorism? I can charge extra bc I don't speak arabic, apparently. @p2wy
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @p2wy Twittering is hard work. I wonder if i could get paid $450/hour because I spend too much time on it?
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade This is why you're such trouble. If you don't like stories how will they make you obey?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @firetomfriedman I DO think they might not get death. They want it SO badly though. @onekade
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Govt whose Twitter witness didn't even click through links on Twitter now trying to discredit defense witness w/o "special Twitter training"
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Because everyone likes a good story.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @draperha I had to compete 2 years ago from the bottom of a KY holler w/absolute no Toobz. No consideration given.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade It's such an easy guilty verdict, but govt had to write its little story.
1hreplyretweetfavorite