Both These Things Cannot Be True

Last Friday, NSA’s Compliance Director John DeLong assured journalists the violations NSA reported in 2012 were “miniscule.” (I noted that the report showed some of the most sensitive violations primarily get found through audits and therefore their discovery depend in part on how many people are auditing.)

Today, as part of a story describing that NSA still doesn’t know what Edward Snowden took from NSA, MSNBC quotes a source saying NSA has stinky audit capabilities.

Another said that the NSA has a poor audit capability, which is frustrating efforts to complete a damage assessment.

(We’ve long known this about NSA’s financial auditing function, and there have long been signs they couldn’t audit data either, but apparently MSNBC’s source agree.)

For the past several months, various Intelligence officials have assured Congress and the public that it keeps US person data very carefully guarded, so only authorized people can access it.

Today, MSNBC reports NSA had (has?) poor data compartmentalization.

NSA had poor data compartmentalization, said the sources, allowing Snowden, who was a system administrator, to roam freely across wide areas.

Again, there have long been signs that non-analysts had untracked access to very sensitive data. Multiple sources agree — and possibly not just non-analysts.

While I’m really sympathetic for the people who are reportedly “overwhelmed” trying to figure out what Snowden took, we’re seeing precisely the same thing we saw with Bradley Manning: that it takes a giant black eye for intelligence agencies to even admit to gaping holes in their security and oversight.

And in NSA’s case, it proves most of their reassurances to be false.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

18 Responses to Both These Things Cannot Be True

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @LuaWilkinson @DrJenGunter @kevinmd That he let his male hormones get in way of his presidency. Hey, wasn't my claim, but it was out there.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz What’s the evidence for the allegations against Clinton on the Uranium deal? There isn’t any http://t.co/V1zpKLU5aS
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @dangillmor: Obama is dissembling, and worse, on "trade" (actually corporate-favors) deal. http://t.co/6gL6Iry8lo by @joanwalsh
36mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @dangillmor: Why Obama's new attorney general is likely to be worse for liberty than the one she replaced: https://t.co/GeBXMPxxC5
53mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JeffreyToobin Are you attending Glossip too?
54mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel When will we move POTUS debate beyond the fight over which oligarch-funded candidate is the biggerer tool of the rich? ALL major ones are.
57mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ammar82: Former UN envoy Benomar:Yemen deal was close b4 Saudi airstrikes, derailed agreement that could've averted conflict!! http://t…
58mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @steve_vladeck: This may be the nerdiest tweet I've ever sent--and _that's_ saying something. :-) Thanks, @bmaz... https://t.co/tM3R6nnH
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @steve_vladeck Always aiming to be helpful you know....
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @steve_vladeck: @bmaz @SCOTUSblog Not just equitable tolling--appellate JX over BIA denials of motions to reopen _based upon_ equitable …
1hreplyretweetfavorite