How to Get the Government to Ease Up: Involve Scott Shane

This is fairly extraordinary. BuzzFeed reports that in an effort to alleviate some of the pressure from the UK it is bringing in the NYT — but just one reporter from the NYT — to report on the Snowden stories.

“In a climate of intense pressure from the UK government, The Guardian decided to bring in a US partner to work on the GCHQ documents provided by Edward Snowden,” Guardian spokeswoman Jennifer Lindenauer said in an email. “We are continuing to work in partnership with the NYT and others to report these stories.”

That reporter is not James Risen — who of course broke the original NSA story with Eric Lichtblau. It is not Charlie Savage — who had an important story based on the Snowden leaks already.

It is Scott Shane.

The Times’s Charlie Savage and other reporters have chased the NSA story aggressively, despite Snowden’s choice to go to fillmmaker Laura Poitras, theGuardian’s Glenn Greenwald, and Barton Gellman, who has written about the documents for the Washington Post. Snowden said he did not go to the Timesbecause the paper bowed to Bush Administration demands to delay a story on warrantless wiretapping in the interest of national security; he was afraid, he said, the paper would do the same with his revelations.

Now, Times reporter Scott Shane is at work on a series of stories expected to be published next month jointly with the Guardian, a source familiar with the plans said. The source said the internal arrangement has also been the cause of some tension in the newsroom, as other national security reporters working on the NSA story — Savage and James Risen, among others — are not centrally involved in stories based on the Guardian’s documents.

Scott Shane has an increasingly consistent ability to tell grand tales that serve the interests of The Powers that Be. And somehow his stories about extremely sensitive subjects like drones don’t get chased for leaks.

Was the alleviation of pressure tied to Scott Shane in particular, a journalist who hasn’t followed this story as closely as some of his colleagues?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

14 Responses to How to Get the Government to Ease Up: Involve Scott Shane

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective @Atrios @emptywheel @adambonin McCoy does not look done to me. But we shall see.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Prolly not though: They'd have to leak some FAR more sensitive secrets to catch up to Petraeus and his unlocked desk drawer.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Wondering if @wikileaks rebranded under moniker "David Petraeus' Unlocked Desk Drawer" whether Assange could get probation?
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The Iggles traded Shady McCoy to the Wagon Circlers?? WTF??? cc: @Atrios @emptywheel @adambonin
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @caidid Just make sure you're back parked and unavailable. when he needs to get in to jump his car.
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @dnvolz Apparently some people can't find enough other news today.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pedinska @emptywheel Good fences make for good llamas!
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @armandodkos I mean if you still consider guy who stored crown jewels in unlocked desk drawer good on NatSec you don't deserve to be on SSCI
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @armandodkos Right, when 1st reax fr most people was "OMIGOD THAT'S WHAT HE LEAKED!?!?!" Fucking crown jewels in his unlocked desk drawer
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I'm no hawk on Espionage prosecutions, but collective yawn fr official DC reveals how BS most leak prosecutions are. http://t.co/wu7665p4PR
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Apparently leaking multiple covert officers' IDs now classified as "a very silly chapter." http://t.co/wu7665p4PR Why give anonymity here?
51mreplyretweetfavorite