The Black Budget

Screen shot 2013-08-29 at 2.50.28 PMThe Washington Post just published an excellent package on the FY2013 Black Budget for intelligence. I’m reading through the summary now.

I’ll put working comments below. But one of my first impressions is that all of this is useful information, and in some ways really encouraging information (in others, horrifying).

For that reason, this is one of my favorite parts of the story itself:

Lee Hamilton, an Indiana Democrat who was a former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and co-chairman of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks, said that access to budget figures has the potential to enable an informed public debate on intelligence spending for the first time, much as Snowden’s disclosures of NSA surveillance programs brought attention to operations that had assembled data on nearly every U.S. citizen.

“Much of the work that the intelligence community does has a profound impact on the life of ordinary Americans, and they ought not to be excluded from the process,” he said.

“Nobody is arguing that we should be so transparent as to create dangers for the country,” he said. But, he said, “there is a mindset in the national security community — leave it to us, we can handle it, the American people have to trust us. They carry it to quite an extraordinary length so that they have resisted over a period of decades transparency. . . . The burden of persuasion as to keeping something secret should be on the intelligence community, the burden should not be on the American public.”

Hamilton is absolutely right. There’s no reason why information at this level of detail shouldn’t be shared with American taxpayers ponying up the $52.6 billion to pay for it all.


Working comments on Budget Justifications

4: The IC is apparently going to start researching trade disputes. I assume that’ll be primarily targeted at China. But it’s an interesting development.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

35 Responses to The Black Budget

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @regretblues Even AG Lynch apparently did it yesterday. Partly, I forgive that bc that's what journos know. But ... still.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @regretblues Partly Admin effort to prevent people fr looking too closely, partly bc few people know both politics & programs.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @charlie_simpson Oh. You didn't tell me you were watching Rafa. That changes everything.
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I think @charlie_simpson is having the worst day in the entire First World. https://t.co/L0kq1oB0zf
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @DVNJr: The shocking human toll of #FIFA’s corruption: http://t.co/uYkpDQTjvl http://t.co/RHihVjzBve
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @NYTBen: Jolani: "There is no such thing as the Khorasan group. This is something we only heard about from the Americans."
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Live by the Beard, die by the Beard
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Things people say when you are circling down the toilet into the Sepptic tank: https://t.co/lpfKLjhvXp
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nbilka @CNN Oh crikey, don't set standards I am on the far side of the sun from.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Still a number of emergency vehicles at site of San Diego Fish Market fire as sun sets. News says everyone is ok. http://t.co/W6Hhac27ii
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nbilka Brilliant of Ficker to have gone on @CNN to yak about the former client then. [I may need to hari kari now...]
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nbilka Heh, "vouching for your client". Cause, you know, there are no stop signs that come attendant to that idea.
9hreplyretweetfavorite