Under Keith Alexander’s Guard, America Can Be Plundered Like a Colony

Admittedly, Keith Alexander made things very easy on himself in this article on “Defending America in Cyberspace” by not mentioning the way DOD (or our ally, Israel) let StuxNet go free, not only exposing the attack on Iran, but also providing a map and code that others can use on us.

That reckless mistake and its potential consequences remains unmentioned, however, in the piece in which Alexander claims that his team has found and is implementing the magic formula for defending the country in cyberspace.

We have learned through two decades of trial and error that operationalizing our cyberdefenses by linking them to intelligence and information-assurance capabilities is not only the best but also the only viable response to growing threats.

We know how to defend the country, Alexander says. It involves creating security holes, then using them to find out who will attack us, all while living on the network and watching what private citizens are also doing.

But then Alexander utterly contradicts the claim that his team has found the successful formula by describing the sheer scale of successful attacks against the US, suggesting it rivals the plunder of the Mongols and the colonies (though curiously, not slavery).

Three times over the previous millennium, military revolutions allowed forces to conquer huge territories and forcibly transfer riches from losers to winners (namely, in the Mongol conquests of China, Russia and Baghdad; the Spanish conquests of the Americas; and the European empires in the nineteenth century). Remote cyberexploitation now facilitates the systematic pillaging of a rival state without military conquest and the ruin of the losing power. We have seen a staggering list of intrusions into major corporations in our communications, financial, information-technology, defense and natural-resource sectors. The intellectual property exfiltrated to date can be counted in the tens to hundreds of thousands of terabytes. We are witnessing another great shift of wealth by means of cybertheft, and this blunts our technological and innovative edge. Yet we can neither prevent major attacks nor stop wholesale theft of intellectual capital because we rely on architecture built for availability, functionality and ease of use—with security bolted on as an afterthought.

This repeats a claim he and others have made repeatedly, though after having been proven wrong about past claims about the scale of financial wealth transfer, he seems to have shifted to measuring the plunder that has occurred on his watch in terabytes, not dollars. Our country — which he has served in a key defense role for 8 years — has been plundered like a colony (I don’t buy this, mind you — I find the analogy downright offensive. But it is the argument he’s making).

In much of the rest of his paper, Alexander explains his future plans, which we should follow, he tells us, because he has been so successful that our country has been plundered like a colony.

I wonder. Might the most sane response to this paper be to, at a minimum, question what success looks like? At a minimum, might we discuss publicly some alternatives? And if being plundered like a colony is not our goal, perhaps we should consider whether what Alexander presents as the “only viable response” really is?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

22 Responses to Under Keith Alexander’s Guard, America Can Be Plundered Like a Colony

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @Silversalty As ODNI and Comey noted, they'll query off more data under new program @DavidRomeiPHD @Snowden @ggreenwald
emptywheel @Silversalty Not entirely a workaround. But 215 was only ever a small corner of dragnet. @DavidRomeiPHD @Snowden @ggreenwald
bmaz @emptywheel @digby56 Actually you've been fairly quiet today. How the Blue Khaki's doing?
emptywheel @digby56 So am I. (That and shitty reporting on the dragnet.) But it's a big sports day.
emptywheel @joanneleon When debate started, O would have had to go back for Congress to treat Libya as ISIS. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon When debate started, GOP didn't call it for a vote bc they would have lost on ground troops, unlimited geography. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon Right. Libya. But disagree precedent set: you can limit it. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon What's important of timing of call for it is this won't be a limited AUMF. It'll be Iraq War 2.0. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon Not having an AUMF basically says unlimited POTUS powers are cool. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon I'm supporting an AUMF that puts geographical limits, defines ISIS, rules out certain activities. @EliLake
emptywheel @joanneleon I think people on both side of issue can support AUMF (as I do). But yes, now hawks will get boots on the ground. @EliLake
emptywheel What's nutty abt the dragnet--and govt's attempt to pretend it has ended it--is all other countries dragnet with notice. Still mostly works.
October 2013
« Sep   Nov »