Things Barack Obama Doesn’t Consider “Abuse”

Unauthorized suspected terroristsPresident Obama will shortly give a speech in which he’ll make cosmetic changes to the NSA dragnet, but will continue, in many ways, the accessing of personal data from Americans with no probable cause.

As part of his cosmetic effort, he will also say there has been no evidence of abuse in these programs. That means he does not consider any of the following abuse:

  • The NSA spied on the porn and phone sex habits of ideological opponents, including those with no significant ties to extremists, and including a US person.
  • According to the NSA in 2009, it had a program similar to Project Minaret — the tracking of anti-war opponents in the 1970s — in which it spied on people in the US in the guise of counterterrorism without approval. We still don’t have details of this abuse.
  • When the NSA got FISC approval for the Internet (2004) and phone (2006) dragnets, NSA did not turn off features of Bush’s illegal program that did not comply with the FISC authorization. These abuses continued until 2009 (one of them, the collection of Internet metadata that qualified as content, continued even after 2004 identification of those abuses).
  • Even after the FISC spent 9 months reining in some of this abuse, the NSA continued to ignore limits on disseminating US person data. Similarly, the NSA and FBI never complied with PATRIOT Act requirements to develop minimization procedures for the Section 215 program (in part, probably, because NSA’s role in the phone dragnet would violate any compliant minimization procedures).
  • The NSA has twice — in 2009 and 2011 — admitted to collecting US person content in the United States in bulk after having done so for years. It tried to claim (and still claims publicly in spite of legal rulings to the contrary) this US person content did not count as intentionally-collected US person content (FISC disagreed both times), and has succeeded in continuing some of it by refusing to count it, so it can claim it doesn’t know it is happening.
  • As recently as spring 2012, 9% of the NSA’s violations involved analysts breaking standard operating procedures they know. NSA doesn’t report these as willful violations, however, because they’ve deemed any rule-breaking in pursuit of “the mission” not to be willful violations.
  • In 2008, Congress passed a law allowing bulk collection of foreign-targeted content in the US, Section 702, to end the NSA’s practice of stealing Internet company data from telecom cables. Yet in spite of having a legal way to acquire such data, the NSA (through GCHQ) continues to steal data from some of the same companies, this time overseas, from their own cables. Arguably this is a violation of Section 702 of FISA.
  • NSA may intentionally collect US person content (including Internet metadata that legally qualifies as content) overseas (it won’t count this data, so we don’t know how systematic it is). If it does, it may be a violation of Section 703 of FISA.

Rather than discussing any of these violations, the NSA has waved around a few cases of LOVEINT (most, if not all, of which have not been prosecuted) as part of a successful ploy to distract from much more systemic abuses of its authority, affecting far more Americans.

But there has been abuse, even beyond practices (like back door searches) that gut the Fourth Amendment or (like NSA’s approach to encryption) that hurt Americans’ security.

President Obama will spend a lot of time saying there have been no abuses. He’s wrong.

Tweet about this on Twitter198Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook104Google+9Email to someone

7 Responses to Things Barack Obama Doesn’t Consider “Abuse”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq They wouldn't let me pre-order at the price yet.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Krhawkins5 @onekade @jilliancyork @emptywheel @JameelJaffer @CIA And, yet, DEA is most ruthless+competent of all of them
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq ...cause I drive around to so many different courts and am otherwise mobile.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq My two years not up until Oct 31. Want (eyes need!) screen size of Plus, but thing has to work as main office phone too
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq @SammSacks Is it too big to use easily as a phone?
20mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @saftergood: CRS memo on proposals to expatriate US citizens who fight for terrorist groups (pdf) http://t.co/fa3MwrXv38
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ttagaris Actually a remarkably non-shitty panel, even if there are no girls. @ChrisMurphyCT
31mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @elizabeth_joh: Instead of official statistics resisting arrest numbers may be best measure of NYPD use of force by @jdavidgoodman http:…
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @NaheedMustafa Agree, but they're using current unjustified fearmongering to do things they haven't tried before (citizen stripping, eg)
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jilliancyork When is it? I've been putting off a FBI post that I REALLY need to finish? @onekade
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jilliancyork This is one of many reasons I find USAF "transparency" provisions so problematic, btw. Designed to obscure FBI.
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jilliancyork FBI FBI FBI FBI. Also local cops and CBP and ATF and--just ask @onekade for the others.
34mreplyretweetfavorite