2014 withdrawal

Newest Leaked NATO Report Aimed at Preventing Afghanistan Withdrawal?

Fresh on the heels of the “leak” to the New York Times two weeks ago of an already public report on Afghan troops killing US troops, another NATO report casting a bad light on the current war effort in Afghanistan has been leaked. This time the report was made available to the British press, with BBC and the Times of London (behind a paywall and therefore not getting a link) being shown copies of the report. Interestingly, most news stories on the leaked report concentrate on the report’s claim that Pakistan, and especially Pakistan’s ISI, is helping the Taliban in Afghanistan, a fact which is already known and which was dismissed by Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Hina Khar as “old wine in an even older bottle.”  Reuters hits on another, likely more important aspect of the report, however, even including it as their headline: “Taliban ‘poised to retake Afghanistan’ after NATO pullout“.

The information contained in this new leak gives further support for my thinking on the reasoning behind the information fed to the New York Times for their January 20 article, when I said “The story appears to me to be presented from the angle of military higher-ups who don’t want to withdraw from Afghanistan and point to the failed training of Afghan forces to support their argument that we must stay there.” In much the same way, this report, which points out that the Taliban will retake Afghanistan shortly after we leave, supports the conclusion that we must stay there to “win” what President Obama has called our “war of necessity“.

For a President who has put so much effort into punishing those who leak sensitive information (well, at least whistleblowers who leak), Obama now appears to me to be faced with a military that is engaged in the selective release of information that is designed to make it impossible for him to continue his plan to withdraw troops from Afghanistan by the end of 2014. Will there be any punishment for these two recent leaks, or are they some “multidimensional chess” setting the stage for Obama to throw up his hands and declare that we can’t leave after all?

As for the meat of the leaked report, BBC has posted selected excerpts. This excerpt, for example, is along the lines of most press reports: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @TheTweetOfGod: The people who say I send viruses and disasters as a means to punish you for your sins, are the means by which I punish …
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Gonna keep nagging you, you know...
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @trevortimm @ncardozo Could do a LOT worse. For instance, @stewartbaker once served in government.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @donachaidh Lol yes!
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich Hey, did you sign up for frequent flier miles yet?
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The hyperbole being engaged in by the relentless @ggreenwald haters is light years more ridiculous than any potential hyperbole by Glenn.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @wellsbennett @steve_vladeck If so, wouldn't you expect some quick attempt to correct the record?
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sbagen Maybe MI's football team would be better if fans didn't use racist epithets? @DevG98 @forthewin
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @pwnallthethings What terrorist org known for its financial resourcefulness hacks brokers but doesn't try and steal anything silently?
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @kansasalps "Exploited." Because democracy. @ashk4n
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Also, I'd like to see a tech-off between "this fella" (@ashk4n) and Michael Hayden. http://t.co/BdDhiGvCIF
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @kansasalps Wow. When govt arguable engaged in criminal obstruction to over up Hayden's own crimes. @ashk4n
41mreplyretweetfavorite
October 2014
S M T W T F S
« Sep    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031