Declan McCullagh

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV @GottaLaff Was in my local paper, too. What a load of crap. #HobbyLobbySucks
bmaz @DanCBarr APS also was central in the purchase of the AG's race too, no?
bmaz RT @DanCBarr: Memo to AZ news media -- This story is far more important than Jodi Arias or that it rains during monsoon season. http://t.c…
bmaz RT @emptywheel: Since we've survived yesterday, reminder that in 2004 CIA kept terror threat alive as excuse to torture, wiretap. http://t.…
emptywheel Who knows what they did yesterday in name of preventing the scary ISIS threat?
emptywheel Since we've survived yesterday, reminder that in 2004 CIA kept terror threat alive as excuse to torture, wiretap.
bmaz @PogoWasRight @ValtteriBottas @MassaFelipe19 @WilliamsRacing Not sure it would have mattered, still likely P4 and P5 finish
emptywheel @adamjohnsonNYC Better than that than fighting the banksters, those who fund it surely have concluded.
JimWhiteGNV Wait I'm still alive. Wasn't ISIS supposed to kill us all yesterday? The fear industrial complex gets it wrong. Every. Single. Time.
bmaz Big ups to @ChuckTodd and @MeetThePress for giving Cruz and Trump a platform for spreading their bigotry!
bmaz @JWGOP @ussoccer_wnt Granted, football can't start soon enough.
bmaz @JWGOP No, the soccer day doesn't start until the British Grand Prix is over, and THEN it is all about @ussoccer_wnt !!
July 2015
« Jun