Declan McCullagh

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @NCAACWS: WEEKEND ITINERARY Fri - Watch College Baseball Sat - Watch College Baseball Sun - Watch College Baseball SCHEDULE: http://t.…
38sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @EamonJavers: NEW: US government officials complain Silicon Valley firms are dragging their feet on getting security clearances. http://…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston @csoghoian has a history of non-delivery with those he deems easy targets. @ageis @ashk4n @ahoymehearties @NewAmerica
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @matthewt_ny Is there a Q&A during which you can ask "Why not Wall Street"?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston He's probably just trying to get whiskey out of @csoghoian. @ashk4n @ahoymehearties
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @matthewt_ny Or Schumer
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes Better if he respond indirectly by riling up prestigious judges on the other side of the world. @steve_vladeck
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel By Preet? RT @matthewt_ny: "He is a true superstar," among American lawyers, we're told of Preet.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @dnvolz Plus, DHS is funded through September so you need a hobby now. @normative
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq All I'm saying is the plea only says none of the Black Books made it into her book. Very limited statement. @Thomas_Drake1
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BradMossEsq Sure. Which, if they did, would fall into the "not everything known is in plea" category. @Thomas_Drake1
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Some of them even people you've never heard about claiming to be experts on a topic you're an expert on!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
March 2015
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031