Declan McCullagh

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JPughMI I'm so old I remember when Abdullah was Barry Sanders.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @digby56 She thinks she's a libertarian.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @digby56 Look. The RNC gave her that loot fairly. No reason she should be taxed on loot!
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @rcooley123: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Give Diplomacy a Chance - http://t.co/BPPjjJPdpv |
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV Cause Reagan never got political credit for Beirut and so didn't keep trying to resuscitate his reputation.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @realDonaldTrump @SarahPalinUSA Sorry. I'd rather give a constipated pig an enema.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV George W. Bush returning to New Orleans on Katrina anniversary is so stupid. Why didn't Reagan return to Beirut?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @onekade It made me sad. Stupid catwalk in indoor dome prevented what could have been the best catch evah...
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @cherylrofer: @ISISNuclear What makes you think the AP document is accurate?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Cy Vance did pull his name fr RentBoy bust. http://t.co/VFNIl8dS4c Otherwise I'd suggest it relates to his Times Square Boobies
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @44amazingrace @gandalfstaff @CNN Well, @cnni is still a LOT better that domestic CNN. But yeah...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @csoghoian: The US droned a guy who wrote a RAT & hacked Facebook accounts for ISIS. We live in the future http://t.co/n3gmCRqqof http:/…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031