Harry Pregerson

“Liberal” 9th Circuit Deals Death Blow To Al-Haramain Illegal Wiretapping Accountability Case

There is only one substantive case left in litigation with the ability to bring tangible accountability for the illegal and unconstitutional acts of the Bush/Cheney Administration’s warrantless wiretapping and surveillance program. That case is Al-Haramain v. Bush/Obama. Yes, there is still Clapper v. Amnesty International, but that is a prospective case of a different nature, and was never designed to attack the substantive crimes of the previous Administration.

A little over a couple of hours ago, late morning here in the 9th, the vaunted “most liberal of all Circuit Courts of Appeal”, the Ninth Circuit, drove what may be the final stake in the heart of Al-Haramain by declining to conduct an en banc review of its August 7, 2012 opinion. The notice from the court today is brief:

The opinion filed on August 7, 2012, and appearing at 690 F.3d 1089, is hereby amended. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.

With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for en banc or panel rehearing shall be permitted.

Before going further with analysis, a word about the “amendments” to the opinion. The “Amended Opinion” is here. You can compare for yourself to the August 7 original opinion linked above, but the difference is pretty slight.

It appears all the court did is delete a few sentences here and there about 18 USC 2712(b). The court did not address, nor change, their erroneous assertion that plaintiffs’ Al-Haramain could have sued under 1806(a), or restore the misleadingly-omitted (by elipsis) language from 1806(a). Nor did the →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz Jon Turley has serious issues w/the authoritarian Obama Exec Branch usurpation of separated powers. https://t.co/ScBVx52aHO Lynch won't help
49sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joanneleon some will be more forthright abt our wars.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @dcbigjohn: This SIGAR report in Afghanistan spending really puts the lie to "most transparent administration" claim http://t.co/GQhPOky
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Yet more out of control cops RT @radleybalko This is looking bad. http://t.co/rTFPm2yp2P
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JonathanTurley She seems to recognize no bounds on Executive Branch power; maybe you could address that problem.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz I love @digby56 but, dammit, I had totally forgotten that Joe Klein existed before she up and had to remind me. http://t.co/MYUQ30AvTD
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold @AmbassadorPower @SenFeinstein Jason, that word has banned from the lexicon of our mighty political elites. Don't trifle them.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel What if Rand Paul ran on this? "As President, I promise to classify how much war we're at so you can pretend I've ended it."
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mattapuzzo MILLIONSWILLDIE (which, if true, would be far worse than the hundreds of thousands I'm in the process of killing)
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cristianafarias No biggie. It's what @bmaz gets for going so long between legal posts. ;p
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cristianafarias That's @bmaz, not me. Somehow fit it in between Super Bowl events.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @MonaHol: Poop found on gym floor: Students forced to expose underwear for inspection http://t.co/vgNUZl8JMt Attn: @ChuckCJohnson. Ur al…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2015
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031