Marja Serves as Microcosm of Military Failure in Afghanistan, But Failure is Country-Wide

Deputy Defense Secretary Aston Carter strolls through Marja marketplace on February 24. How many security forces were present out of camera range?

Back in February of 2010, US President Barack Obama’s surge of troops in Afghanistan began its offensive by trying to take the Marja district of Helmand Province. Then US commander of forces in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal famously touted his counterinsurgency program for the area, saying “We’ve got a government in a box, ready to roll in”.

Eight months into the battle for Marja, we had this:

As U.S. involvement in the war enters its 10th year, the failure to pacify this town raises questions about the effectiveness of America’s overall strategy. Similarly crucial operations are now under way in neighboring Kandahar province, the Taliban’s birthplace.

There are signs the situation in Marjah is beginning to improve, but “it’s still a very tough fight,” said Capt. Chuck Anklam, whose Marine company has lost three men since arriving in July. “We’re in firefights all over, every day.”

“There’s no area that’s void of enemy. But there’s no area void of Marines and [Afghan forces] either,” said Anklam, 34, of Fort Lauderdale, Fla. “It’s a constant presence both sides are trying to exert.”


The result, so far at least: Residents say the town is more insecure than ever.

“There was peace here before you came,” farmer Khari Badar told one Marine patrol that recently visited his home. “Today, there is only fighting.”

Of course, the Defense Department would have us believe everything is now fine in Marja. They staged a stroll through the marketplace back in February by a Deputy Defense Secretary, presumably to mark the two year anniversary of the offensive. I wonder if this stroll was as heavily protected as John McCain’s 2007 stroll through a Baghdad marketplace.

But even though we are supposed to believe the offensive worked in Marja and the Taliban were routed, there was this from DoD on actions from April 15 of this year: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @J_T_Horowitz Yup. Most investigating officers wouldn't make that career damaging mistake.
emptywheel @BalkansBohemia Yes, I'm suggesting it may well be both. Still hard to target hospital as precisely the did based on "near" fighting.
emptywheel @Zvyozdochka Not necessarily, though that is poss explanation.
emptywheel @grizzleeman But you're assuming SOF knew the reason. They may or may not have. If no eyes on may not have vetted.
emptywheel @J_T_Horowitz Yes, but Campbell receives report & he 1) has claimed only "several" died and 2) claims he's being transparent when hiding ROE
emptywheel @DanaHoule Yup. But right now ROE is the shiny object hiding the underlying reason for request (and poss US complicity in that).
emptywheel In other words, possible 1) US violated ROE/procedure by not vetting Afghan request 2) Afghans deliberately targeted hospital (war crime)
emptywheel @J_T_Horowitz Yes. And when they're squawking as loudly as they are abt that, all the more reason.
emptywheel @J_T_Horowitz Better yet independent one! Afghans want our air cover to stick around until 2017. Conflict high there too.
emptywheel @DanaHoule Golly, because that never happens when we fail to vet our targeting. Like in Yemen last Monday?!?!
October 2015
« Sep