“Countering Violent Extremism”

Sorry to let the threads grow so long of late–I’ve been out weeding again, if you know what I mean.

So partly to open up another thread to discuss the many ways in which our government kills Americans and/or journalists, and partly because we’ve been talking about whether the Hutaree militia organizing 40 miles from my house to the west, or whether the Imam gunned down by the FBI 30 miles in the other direction, were terrorists, I wanted to point to a Mark Hosenball post on the jargon replacing “GWOT”:

Not long after President Obama took office, he unofficially put an end to a favorite phrase of his predecessor: the “global war on terror.” True, George W. Bush used it so much that GWOT, as it became known in Washington, had largely lost its impact. But it got the job done—and Obama had yet to find a tough, pithy replacement. Until now.

In a speech today before a conference on post-9/11 intelligence-reform efforts, Director of National Intelligence Dennis Blair didn’t once utter the words “global war on terror.” But at least twice he talked about the administration’s efforts at “countering violent extremism.”

[snip]

CVE has been slowly catching on among the Obama crowd. Daniel Benjamin, the State Department’s top counterterrorism adviser, used it in testimony he gave to the Senate Armed Services Committee last month. As Benjamin explained it, “The primary goal of countering violent extremism is to stop those most at risk of radicalization from becoming terrorists. Its tools are noncoercive and include social programs, counter-ideology initiatives, and working with civil society to delegitimize the Al Qaeda narrative and, where possible, provide positive alternative narratives.” He added, “We are working hard to develop a variety of CVE programs.”

Hosenball also quotes John Brennan acknowledging that terrorism is a tactic.

It seems we’re replacing the word “terrorist,” then, with “extremist.” Preferable, in my mind, to be sure. But how will the term be used in the United States where we’ve got nutcases threatening members of Congress because they don’t like democratic votes? And will the fight against extremists merit special tactics in return, like the targeting of Americans with no due process?

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

80 Responses to “Countering Violent Extremism”

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @saramayeux: but, as this article shows so graphically, in prisons w/worst abuses, grievance process is chimera. threats of retaliation…
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @saramayeux: PLRA says, judges have to toss out lawsuit if prisoner did not first exhaust all administrative grievance procedures w/in t…
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @saramayeux: finally read @EyalPress's horrifying account of how Florida prisoners are tortured, largely with impunity: https://t.co/6Dk
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @adamgoldmanwp @DanLamothe It's funny, I've not seen a single report mention his mother Krista, who was so central to C-4 when was younger.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @StephStradley Can't argue with some of us, because we've been in agreement from the get go!
45mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TimothyS Yup.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @reason: Trump vs. Clinton Is Terrible News for Fans of Free Speech and the First Amendment https://t.co/R5oOxXpdQc
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TimothyS No, "Oh Henry"!
53mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @GreggJLevine Exactly. Should be painting Trump as the epitome of mainstream Republican party ideology.
54mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @barrettmarson @GovDucef That @thucydidesAz chap is a riot though.
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz No clue why anybody thought differently https://t.co/HJVgZNsQOi
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @brahmresnik @3ameam Interesting! I always end up with the prosecutors after such a referral. Thank.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2010
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930