Pam Bondi Fired the Avenger of Sex Trafficking Victims on Donald Trump’s Personal Authority

I’ve often said that, this time, Donald Trump has chosen poorly of which people to make political martyrs.

Less than eight hours after proclaiming that the Jeffrey Epstein scandal was just some “new SCAM” perpetrated by Democrats, about four days after he first attempted to float the wildly illogical claim that the Epstein “Files [were] written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration,” DOJ fired Jim Comey’s daughter, Maurene.

According to the NYT, the letter terminating Ms. Comey cited Article II authority.

Ms. Comey was informed of her firing in a letter that cited Article II of the Constitution, which describes the powers of the president, according to two of the people.

In recent weeks, Pam Bondi’s DOJ has pursued an accelerating purge of prosecutors, public affairs professionals, and ethics advisors protected by civil service protections, also citing Article II authority. But somehow Ms. Comey’s firing took place after Trump started to lose his shit over his inability to squelch his own supporters’ mania about the Epstein scandal.

After Donald Trump started to go nuts about Epstein, Ms. Comey was fired on Trump’s own personal authority. It’s certainly possible this SCOTUS would uphold his authority to do so, if sued. But he’d have to spend a lot of time arguing about his own personal discretion in the decision to fire her.

He did this. Donald Trump did this.

And all the while, her role as a prosecutor in the Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Diddy cases would be at the forefront.

Even ignoring the insanely stupid timing of Ms. Comey’s termination, creating at least the appearance of a connection between Trump’s failing attempts to squelch conspiracy theories and her firing, there are two other details that Pam Bondi cannot have thought through.

First, the indictment of Epstein and the prosecution of Maxwell depended — as did the reporting from Julie Brown (which Miami Herald has now posted together) it built on — on developing the trust of the victims. Here’s how Geoffrey Berman described it in his book.

Over the next weeks and months, a team of FBI agents, NYPD detectives, and our prosecutors scrambled to make that happen. This meant that they identified victims, interviewed them, and went about the sensitive task of getting them to agree to testify in open court against their tormentor. Without the voices of these young women—girls when Epstein raped them—there was not a case. That our team accomplished these tasks without word leaking to Epstein or his lawyers that he was under investigation is a testament to their intelligence and deftness.

[snip]

I made a plea to the victims: Our job is not over, there is justice to be done, and we need your help. Epstein could not have done what he did without the assistance of others. We ask for your cooperation in our ongoing investigation into Epstein’s co-conspirators. The response was overwhelming. We conducted interviews that afternoon and in the days that followed. Over time, many other victims agreed to be interviewed. After the initial shock of Epstein’s death, I could feel the team refocusing and reenergizing.

One big break was the cooperation of a victim, one of Epstein’s first, whom Maxwell and Epstein had recruited at a summer arts camp back when she was just fourteen years old. She is now an actress and married with children. She told us that Epstein and Maxwell approached her at the camp when she was fourteen. They took what seemed to her, at first, to be a genuine interest in her life and aspirations. Epstein paid for her voice lessons and some other arts instruction.

She had told no one about the abuse that followed, and specifically not her mother, who had naively believed that Epstein’s interest was benign—that he was a kind, wealthy man helping her daughter reach her dreams. It was difficult for her to come forward. She had never wanted her mother to feel guilty. (Her name, thankfully, has not been publicly revealed. Judge Alison Nathan, who was assigned the Maxwell case, allowed the victims to remain anonymous if they so chose.)

What she told us, and would later testify to, was that Maxwell was walking her pet Yorkie when she approached her at the camp. Epstein soon joined them and began asking questions. “He seemed very interested to know what I thought about the camp, what my favorite classes were,” she said.

They stayed in touch, and at one point he took her to Victoria’s Secret and bought her white cotton panties. Soon after, when she was alone with Epstein at his Palm Beach residence, he pulled his pants down, got on top of her, and masturbated. As she later testified at trial, “I was frozen and in fear. I had never seen a penis before. I was terrified and felt gross and like I felt ashamed.” What followed were group sessions involving Epstein, Maxwell, and other women, which began with “Ghislaine or Jeffrey” summoning everyone to follow them to Jeffrey’s bedroom or massage room. We continued to build the case and search for other victims.

The SDNY team, including Ms. Comey, spent a lot of time assuring victims that their willingness to testify might bring them some kind of justice.

I don’t know how the victims will respond to the news that Ms. Comey was fired before Maxwell’s appeals were exhausted (to say nothing of the Diddy sentencing, currently scheduled for October 3). But these victims put trust into Maurene Comey. Maurene Comey was one of the few people who convinced them she would take on very powerful people in search of justice for them.

And Pam Bondi fired her, on Donald Trump’s personal authority.

There’s one more detail. According to Berman, not long before he killed himself, Epstein proffered cooperation with SDNY, in another bid to get a sweetheart plea deal.

[Reid Weingarten] said that he had just come from meeting with Epstein at the Metropolitan Correctional Center and that his client was not happy. (Good! I remember thinking.) “I think my client might want to have an interesting conversation with your office,” he said.

I had expected an overture. With Epstein facing forty-five years in prison—a life sentence for a man his age—it made sense for him to want a deal. But my openness to one was quite limited. He’d already been given the deal of the century in South Florida, buying him more than a decade of undeserved freedom.

Prosecutors, though, never foreclose the conversation. At minimum, you may get new leads, more victims to talk to, additional perpetrators. “The Southern District is always interested in having interesting conversations,”

I said. I told my team to expect a call. A few days later, Weingarten reached out. He said that his client would come in for a proffer—an agreement between a defendant and a prosecutor’s office in which the defendant agrees to share information with the understanding that his statements won’t be used against him at trial.

But Epstein had one condition: he wanted assurances that the SDNY did not see him as a rapist. That was the end of that. He was a rapist, and we were not about to give him some other, more polite-sounding label.

Ms. Comey would be one of the people privy to that proffered testimony.

That doesn’t mean she’ll go release it, or even start naming the rapists who victimized the girls Epstein trafficked. Unlike Bondi and her top aides, Ms. Comey will presumably honor her ethical duty.

But having fired Ms. Comey, one of a few people who earned the trust of sex trafficking victims that she would go after the powerful to seek justice for them, and having claimed to do so on the President’s own authority, Pam Bondi has chosen to fire precisely the person who championed justice for sex trafficking victims … and she did so in Donald Trump’s name.

Update: I should say one more thing. It’s possible Bondi (“Blondi,” as Laura Loomer has dubbed her) did this in response to pressure from Loomer. As I noted here, Trump seems loathe to confront Loomer directly, and Bondi is trying hard to shrug off the pressure of Loomer.

But Loomer, for all her hubris, really is pretty dumb about politics outside of her bubble, to say nothing of the law. For example, she’s calling for a Special Counsel to be appointed on Epstein, but under Trump’s FL Get out of Jail Free Card, that would likely require Senate confirmation. So it would be especially rich if Bondi did something this stupid in response to pressure from Loomer.

Update: Politico reports that Ms. Comey sent a letter to colleagues warning against fear.

“If a career prosecutor can be fired without reason, fear may seep into the decisions of those who remain. Do not let that happen,” she wrote. “Fear is the tool of a tyrant, wielded to suppress independent thought. Instead of fear, let this moment fuel the fire that already burns at the heart of this place. A fire of righteous indignation at abuses of power. Of commitment to seek justice for victims. Of dedication to truth above all else.”

[snip]

In her parting message, Comey wrote that during her nearly 10 years at the Manhattan U.S. Attorney’s office, her goal was “making sure people with access, money, and power were not treated differently than anyone else; and making sure this office remained separate from politics and focused only on the facts and the law.”

“Fear,” she wrote, “was never really conceivable.”

Share this entry
66 replies
  1. Rugger_9 says:

    It is clear that Convict-1 is all over the Epstein records, but it is equally clear that he feels cornered with no way out. That’s why we’re seeing all of this feral activity about Epstein and also other topics (like how he forgot he hired Powell as Fed chair), because after the weekend it is crystal clear that MAGA wants to know who Epstein used to protect himself. They won’t like the answer, which is why we had yesterday’s rant that insulted a good proportion of his base. I suspect Convict-1 believes he can lie his way out of it.

    This is why Napoleon said to never interrupt an enemy when he’s making a mistake. Let them talk, but keep the pressure on, for example asking Bondi every day about Epstein and why she’s covering for him, or for variety asking why she’s cutting a deal with a multiple felon child trafficker to bust Abrego on dubious charges in TN. I’m also fairly certain with all of her experience in government service that Ms. Comey also knows how to talk without violating any ethical boundaries.

    The only law this crew follows is: we do what Dear Leader wants. That’s been explicit since the 2020 campaign where the GOP said that was the platform and forgot to edit out 2016 irrelevancies. I also wonder what the SCOTUS majority can do to shut this off, perhaps an order sealing the Epstein records under Presidential immunity.

    • scroogemcduck says:

      Hakeem Jeffries framed it correctly – either they’ve been lying for years about the Epstein files, or they’re lying now. Which is it?

  2. scroogemcduck says:

    Let’s just call this what it clearly is – a cover up. Which is why Trump is losing his shit and is so clearly desperate for the news cycle to move on.

    Below is what Trump said in 2002, and here is the source: https://nymag.com/nymetro/news/people/n_7912/
    “I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.”

    Michael Wolff, perhaps prone to exaggeration but not outright lying (in my view) says Epstein showed him photos taken around 1999-2001 of Trump at Epstein’s mansion with topless girls sitting on his lap.

    I think Bondi, at Trump’s instruction, is cleaning house of anyone who might be in a position to leak evidence. I don’t think he’s worried about Ms Comey talking – he will just dismiss her as “Deep State Jim Comey’s daughter.” He is concerned about someone leaking actual evidence and is taking steps to make sure that does not happen.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      What’s already out there from court filings, etc., is pretty damning even before Maxwell sings. I could see a bid made to seal everything based upon when Epstein was prosecuted during Convict-1’s first term, perhaps claiming national security grounds as well.

      Convict-1 can’t really stop what is out there already, but the SCOTUS majority can probably prevent anything being used in any federal case by judicial fiat.

      • Follower1 says:

        I”m firmly of the belief that once the provisions of the SAVE act are passed by attaching it to other important legislation in the fall then Trump’s usefulness will be over. His increasing dementia, combined with MAGA reaction to the Epstein files, will be the political excuses used by his masters to remove him from office. Vance is equally useful to them since they’ve implemented many of the most important structural changes outlined in Project 2025. The excuse his corporate media supporters will fall for is that Trump will be a major liability in the 2026 midterms.

        [Thanks for updating your username to meet the 8-letter minimum. Please be sure to use the same username and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. /~Rayne]

  3. Frank Anon says:

    I’m starting to get the incredibly surprising sense that Epstein is becoming the vessel for normal RW’ers to find solace in criticizing their hero, and that they are finding it satisfying enough to lightly begin to criticize on other fronts. The failure to shutdown Charlie Kirk is instructive, not because he didn’t follow orders to a T, but because the source of his power – his fellow travellers – wouldn’t let him

    • Rugger_9 says:

      That flip-flop-flip was very interesting to me in that apparently Kirk fears the MAGAts more than Convict-1. I’ve raised this question on an earlier post: how long will Rupert (and Vlad and MBS and…) tolerate their useful idiot in the Oval Office? If Convict-1 loses his influence over the MAGAts what power does he have left that can’t be taken away by his handlers?

  4. Amateur Lawyer At Work says:

    What gets me is that, right now, it doesn’t matter if Trump is a name in the non-public files. The cult that Trump built around being “different” and “an outsider” and “against the elites” is poised to NOT believe anything the DOJ releases, even if Trump isn’t in the files. I have no clue where the GOP goes from here if Trump’s cult collapses over this since they spent over a decade being spineless lackeys for his whims. I don’t see any rising stars in the wings that aren’t beholden to the cult. Independent names are something that Trump crushes with alacrity since no one can have credibility in the cult, outside of what Trump permits.
    Oh, and his distraction was announcing, to Coca-Cola’s surprise, that he persuaded Coca-Cola to switch to cane sugar, when an Iowa’s Senate seat (at least one) and Governor, a Florida Senate seat and Governor, are up for election in 2026. Coke using cane sugar would require removing import restrictions and would collapse a lot of corn prices.

    • chrisanthemama says:

      Interesting tidbit: Coke made with cane sugar is already a thing, and it’s called Mexican Coke.

      • Amateur Lawyer At Work says:

        A number of sodas with cane sugar, coco-mexicano, exist and I’ve had them when I drank sodas. But it’s a less common item on shelves than the HFC variety. Trump’s basically saying he’s going to get rid of the HFC sodas. That’ll play well in Iowa.

        • earlofhuntingdon says:

          Yes, HFC is made from heavily-subsidized corn/maize, and is consequently cheaper than cane sugar. It’s also made domestically.

          Bit of an ugly reminder how much “food” has changed over the last several decades, to be arguing about which sugar sweetens the high-acid sugary beverage that rots our teeth and contributes heavily to metabolic syndrome.

      • Ebenezer Scrooge says:

        It’s also called “Kosher for Passover” Coke. Many Jews will not consume products made of corn during Passover, so Coca-Cola puts out a yellow-capped product, presumably made of cane or beet sugar. It’s a bit of a marketing problem for them. They want to keep observant Ashkenazi Jews as happy customers, so they sell yellow cap at the same price. But sugar is more expensive and more desirable, so they don’t want the word to come out.
        The funny thing is that observant Sephardi Jews, and many observant Conservative Jews, don’t think that corn syrup is forbidden during Passover. But there are plenty of observant Orthodox Ashkenazi Jews.

      • ozajh2023 says:

        Coca-Cola (which I don’t drink) is also made with cane sugar in Australia.

        [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “ozajh” triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established username. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if username does not match. /~Rayne]

      • CaboDano says:

        Correct. And I really don’t care for the cane sugar taste in the Coke down here. But the beer…

    • Savage Librarian says:

      I think the Coke and sugar talk could be related to Trump doing a favor for the Fanjul family. Interestingly, there is another controversy associated with the family that has to do with a white supremacist employee:

      Trump administration quietly lifted ban on sugar company part-owned by South Florida family | WLRN, 3/20/25

      https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/19/business/economy/trump-sugar-forced-labor-ban-lifted.html

      José Fanjul – Wikipedia

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/José_Fanjul

      • BRUCE F COLE says:

        It’s worth noting that Chloe Black was (still is?) Fanjul’s executive assistant (i.e., not just a random employee), and that she married twice, both times to KKK leaders, the former spouse being David Duke and the current spouse being also a member of the American Nazi Party and the CEO of fvcking Stormfront, Don Black.

        • Savage Librarian says:

          Yes, I’ve shared that information several times in the past. Thanks for reminding people, Bruce! It’s been a long journey.

  5. MsJennyMD says:

    How is it the American public needs more evidence of Trump’s abuses, corruption, cruelty, perverted character and endless lying? The man has been accused of sexual misconduct by over 25 women. A felon, a defamer and adjudicated sexual assaulter plus friends with Epstein for 15 years who raped underage girls.

    Trump said, “I’ve known Jeff [Epstein] for 15 years. Terrific guy, He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side.” Remember he boasted, “When you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab’em by the pussy.”

    It is reprehensible the cover and excuses Trump gets from complicit followers and Republicans. Screams volumes about a society that rewards abusive behavior rather than protect our children from sexual predators.

    • P J Evans says:

      They’ve forgotten that he said stuff like that about Ivanka, his own daughter. And there are photos of him with her on his lap, when she was a teen.

      • scroogemcduck says:

        The problem isn’t knowledge, it’s attention. The zone is constantly flooded. Unless attention and focus is maintained on this, people will move on. Dems and left-wing activists need to keep asking the questions

        Where is the Epstein list?
        What is Trump covering up?
        What happened to the missing 3 minutes of video?
        Where did Epstein’s money come from?
        Who is being protected?
        Is Trump being blackmailed?
        Were they lying to us then, or are they lying to us now?
        Does Trump this the American people are fools?

        • Rugger_9 says:

          I also don’t see any revelations about JFK’s and RFK’s assassinations either and given how many conspiracy theories abound (especially about JFK) I find that silence curious.

          Did those files actually get released or is it a ‘package deal’ with the Epstein files?

      • Stuart Dahlquist says:

        I’ve seen those photos but my teenage daughter sat on my lap too. I’m no fan of tRump but that’s not anything to be upset about. There are photos out there of other young girls sitting on his lap. Those concern me.

    • emptywheel says:

      Precisely because Trump has wielded his grievance narrative so well.

      It’s this sense of conspiracism that has protected him.

      • OldTulsaDude says:

        I have experience with the ultra Magpie, a sister-in-law who parrots without question. The only thing that will penetrate the propaganda is a bigger and louder drum pounded constantly.

  6. ExRacerX says:

    “…Bondi (“Blondi,” as Laura Loomer has dubbed her)…”

    heh. It warms my heart to see the leopards eating each others’ faces.

  7. Savage Librarian says:

    Lots of names and details listed in the article cited below. There is even a Brazil connection. Makes me wonder if Trump’s rant and fallacious tariffs there are not only some kind of wacky support for the Bolsonaro coup attempt, but also some kind of subconscious need to ward off an Epstein connection there.

    I don’t think it’s mentioned in the article, but Epstein’s associate, Jean-Luc Brunel, also was found dead in a jail cell (in France, allegedly by hanging, 2/19/22).

    Here’s the article:

    Did a Miami-based modeling agency fuel Jeffrey Epstein’s ‘machine of abuse’? – By Linda Robertson , Julie K. Brown and Nicholas Nehamas – Updated February 19, 2022

    https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article238351108.html

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      Brunel undeniably contributed to Epstein’s web, as the article demonstrates. But so did Trump. There’s no need to “release” any “files” to demonstrate this; as Virginia Giuffre testified, over and over, it was *at Mar a Lago* where she got recruited into Epstein’s “service” as 14-year-old. Her story of rape of a minor being the gateway into what was essentially slavery echoes in the stories of other women who testified in Ghislaine Maxwell’s trial.

      But the list of suicides did not end with Brunel. Giuffre (later Virginia Giuffre Geller) coming forward to tell her story of abuse at the hands of Epstein and Maxwell proved not only a stirring example of personal bravery–of a young woman seizing her voice and claiming her reality in the face of those who had exploited her, people of immensely greater means and power–but also a breakthrough for investigators as she inspired other victims to come forward.

      Virginia Giuffre is silent now. She too died by suicide, in April 2025. As a trauma survivor myself who has wrestled with suicidal impulses my whole life, I am tempted to impose my own reality on hers–to say: They finally got her.

      In fact we never know exactly, not when it’s someone else. But we DO know this: They are doing all they can to silence the survivors. Firing prosecutors like Ms. Comey, closing offices that pursue such cases; all of it indicates that the finger on the scale favors the abusers, not the victims.

      • ShadeSeeker says:

        Not just suicides but death threats should be included in the list.
        The anonymous accuser known as “Jane Doe” (also “Katie Johnson”) withdrew her civil lawsuit against Donald Trump (and Jeffrey Epstein) in early November 2016, and both her attorney Lisa Bloom and multiple news outlets cited that she did so after receiving serious threats against her life and family..

        • Dave Karson says:

          I came across an intriguing detail: according to on-line searching, Katie Johnson, in her 2016 civil lawsuit against Donald Trump, described his “apparatus” as resembling a mushroom. Two years later, Stormy Daniels made a similar description in her 2018 memoir. Coincidence?

      • greenbird says:

        “… the finger on the scale [continually tries to favor] the abusers …”, but relentlessly lights ways — for prosecutors and victims. Always.

  8. Attygmgm says:

    Dismissing Ms. Comey also may prove another blunder born of what looks like panic by Trump. She knows what the trove of evidence consisted of. So there is a now-independent voice to push back, if she chooses to push back, or source, if she chooses not to herself push back, and to remain in the background, to guide others in pursuing information about Epstein’s financing and victims and perps, perhaps including Trump himself. At SDNY she was under some controls. Now she is under none.

  9. gmokegmoke says:

    Thanks for focusing on the women who were hurt and the prosecutor who gained their trust. Very clear explication of what is going on.

    • Spencer Dawkins says:

      I echo GMOKEGMOKE’s appreciation for considering the situation from the view of victims (many of whom were children at the time). That didn’t sink in until I saw this comment. My bad. ^^^^

  10. Matt Foley says:

    I remember Watergate. I remember my father watching the hearings and saying “Nixon is a crook!”. Trump makes Nixon look like a saint.

    It is fascinating to watch video of Trump as he lies and deflects. Like a true sociopath he is able to convert consciousness of guilt (not shame, as he has none) into an Oscar-worthy show of indignation.

    • P J Evans says:

      My mother remembered Nixon’s smear campaign against Helen Gahagan Douglas. That was long before he was president. I was raised to know that he was crooked.

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        Helen Gahagan Douglas was a household name for us as kids. I “campaigned” for Kennedy (that is, against Nixon) every day on my walk to kindergarten in our hyper-majority-Republican town. The other kids did not take my post-election gloating well: a group of Nixonite boys smeared fresh hot tar on my arms and legs. I went home with tar clotting my hair.

        Then we moved to Raleigh, NC. Given my political passions, the fact that the “One Drop* Rule” kept me out of public kindergarten (my parents sent me to religious school) might have been a blessing.

        *”One Drop” of African/slave blood.

        • Spencer Dawkins says:

          I’m reading my way through “Black AF History: The Un-Whitewashed Story of America” by Michael Harriot, and have just gotten to the seam between “holy crap, that sucked a long time ago” and “holy crap, I LIVED THROUGH THAT PART”.

          Thank you for pointing out that a lot of people are still living, who remember everything that went along with “one drop”.

    • Rayne says:

      Wooow. So no longer in love with their white supremacist daddy figure any longer because he couldn’t deliver their liberal pwnage.

  11. Memory hole says:

    One thing that has really bothered me about Bondi, has been her frequent use of poorly feigned outrage about trafficking. Whether human or especially children. It seems like anytime I’ve seen her questioned on something she doesn’t want to answer, she goes to performative disgust about child sex trafficking as a free pass to avoid answering.

    I sure hope this action leads to journalists calling her out every time she tries this stunt going forward. “If you are so set against child sex trafficking, why did you and Trump fire a federal prosecutor with a successful record of prosecuting child sex traffickers?”

    • Rugger_9 says:

      Or, agree to release a multiple felon in exchange for snitching on Abrego whose rap sheet also includes child trafficking. That can’t be lost either.

  12. James O'Connor says:

    OK at the risk of being called clueless or naive: Why didn’t Biden order and cause the release of all the Epstein material in his last days? For that matter, why didn’t he order and cause release of the unredacted Mueller report?

    Nearly all this government secrecy is bullshit.

    • emptywheel says:

      Really curious what you think is still redacted in the Mueller Report, and whether you read what did get released under FOIA.

      Both non-releases cover some of the same material: People who aren’t charged with stuff.

      But the most substantive stuff still redacted in the Mueller Report itself pertains to intelligence on Russian trolls.

      • Spencer Dawkins says:

        Just for people like me, who don’t spend ALL their time thinking about DoJ, it’s useful to periodically remind people that in a normal, non-Trump administration, the president tends to let the process work, rather than tweeting/truthing orders to the Attorney General about who to arrest, prosecute, and/or sue on a daily basis.

        Trump does LOADS of things that Biden might have done, if Biden shared Trump’s view of DoJ, but Biden didn’t do them, because Biden thought DoJ was loyal to the constitution, rather than to Biden.

        (“OK to dispatch Seal Team Six to assassinate a political rival?” included here by reference …

  13. Rayne says:

    I can tell when Marcy’s hit a nerve — the trolls come out with more than just the usual spam.

    They really want to flip this on liberals and they can’t figure out how to do it when the publicly available information points to Trump’s vulnerability with regard to his relationship with Epstein and his refusal to fully open the investigation’s documents.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      Yes, thanks for tending the beautiful garden you have here.

      Any real scandal that has legs is fine with me, especially when it hoists Trump on his own petard.

    • Matt Foley says:

      I’m seeing lots of “Why didn’t Biden release the files?” comments from MAGAs trying to deflect. To which I reply, “Even more reason for Trump to release them.”

  14. Molly Pitcher says:

    Well Pam Bondi is busy on another Trump errand today. She and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum are here in the Bay Area visiting Alcatraz to consider it’s conversion from $60M a year revenue generator, into a Trump Penitentiary.

    Maybe they will come up with an answer for the fact that there is no water on the island. There is no sewer. When is was a prison, it cost three times as much to run as any prison in the country. It is seismically unsafe, it is covered in lead paint and the conservative estimates for bringing it up to a usable facility are a minimum of $100M. But San Francisco is a union town so I say it is closer to $1B to get it going.

    • CaptainCondorcet says:

      Bonus points that inevitably some of the secondary work would be done by undocumented immigrants. What a fool’s errand ordered by a fool and carried out by the same.

    • Rugger_9 says:

      I saw that, and Burgum went on to the Presidio on a fact finding tour. The reason Alcatraz was closed in 1962 was because it is too expensive (at least 3x other prisons) to run. It’s not like the tree-hugging libruls were in vogue then, because the Free Speech Movement didn’t start in Berkeley for another two years.

      That tells me the reasons to close it in 1962 were legit, and FWIW I doubt that the prison could be brought up to standards that wouldn’t violate the 8th Amendment (but with this SCOTUS, well…) or international standards but I doubt Bondi cares about that either.

      It will also create a huge economic hole in SF, but I suspect the current administration would consider that a feature, not a bug.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      I would add the inevitable boatloads of asbestos covering pipes, furnaces, water heaters, ductwork, in the concrete, etc. Remedial work on that alone would cost tends of millions.

      Attempting to convert Alcatraz, a Trump fixation, would be a like turning that gift of a 747 into a real AF1. The free plane will cost a billion to make it work as intended, and take longer than Trump will be in office.

  15. HonestyPolicyCraig says:

    That was an excellent read. I didn’t know of the connection between the two narratives. Thank you for all that you do.

    After reading it, one must wonder, will Pam Bondi go after Trump critics. A horror show.

    [Welcome back to emptywheel. Please use the SAME USERNAME and email address each time you comment so that community members get to know you. You attempted to publish this comment as “SnareDrum” triggering auto-moderation; it has been edited to reflect your established username. Please check your browser’s cache and autofill; future comments may not publish if username does not match. /~Rayne]

  16. zscoreUSA says:

    Interestingly, Berman was on Lawrence Walsh’s Independent counsel team investigating Iran-Contra. I wonder if he came across Epstein’s name back then, as Epstein was working for Adnan Khashoggi.

    NY Times: https://archive.is/UBjgq

  17. Molly Pitcher says:

    Complicite corporate censorship has just hit. CBS is canceling The Late Show with Stephen Colbert effective next May. I have to believe that Trump insisted on this in order for the merger to go forward.

    We are in dangerous times.

    • earlofhuntingdon says:

      CBS hasn’t changed since it canceled the Smothers Brothers to appease Tricky Dick in 1969.

      If Rachel Maddow was able to arrange a special stint at MSNBC for Trump’s first 100 days, I’m sure Colbert will be able to arrange something for the final countdown to the 2026 mid-term elections, just not at the heinous CBS.

      • Molly Pitcher says:

        I see this as a frightening capitulation to a fascist. Coupled with the $16M payment for the Harris interview we are sliding down that slope without brakes. I hope someone has the testicular fortitude to give him a platform.

    • Matt Foley says:

      Nope, still not watching Gutfeld and his “recreational beliefs” (as he calls his bullshit). Nice try, Tiny.

  18. Michael K says:

    “Ms. Comey would be one of the people privy to that proffered testimony.”

    Do we know that any proffered testimony was actually shared?
    Or is it possible his one condition (“he wanted assurances that the SDNY did not see him as a rapist”) was put forward and rejected before he shared anything?
    His lawyers (at least) would presumably be privy either way, but also presumably obligated to secrecy(?)

Comments are closed.