Donald Trump, Alone in the Room with His KGB Handler, Getting His Ass Served on a Picnic Platter

I was the fake news yesterday.

I taunted Kash Patel that he had yet to declassify the Crossfire Hurricane binder Trump purportedly declassified on January 19, 2021. But then I learned that Trump had declassified it.

Sort of.

Trump ordered it released in April, whereupon John Solomon posted it. And after Judicial Watch mentioned it in their FOIA lawsuit, FBI released a copy here. Which I’ve made available here.

I say sort of because, if you compare the released files with the two-part release to Judicial Watch as part of their 2022 FOIA (one, two), there are still a few of the things that were pending for DOJ release that have not been released. Plus, neither re-release includes two Carter Page FISA applications that have been substantially released.

That said, the famed Crossfire Hurricane binder is, as I wrote up in this post, one Dumbass Binder. It is really not all that interesting. It actually doesn’t tell the story of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, not even as completely as Jeffrey Jensen did in his efforts to unravel the Mike Flynn prosecution (but then, that effort involved a great deal of deception and cherry pick).

Almost half of the released pages consist of the Confidential Human Source management files of Christopher Steele and Stefan Halper. Those describe how much the men were paid and when they met with their handlers, including on topics totally unrelated to Crossfire Hurricane. That is, they’re very useful for Russian spies to reconstruct past disclosures. They’re very useful for making anyone who might inform on Trump or Russian sources think twice before cooperating with the FBI.

They’re useless for telling us what really happened with the investigation.

The release of the binder is yet another item in a very long list, seemingly done as part of Trump’s grievance that he needed Russian help to get elected, that has instead served to damage US intelligence, particularly Russian experts, a process I argued was built into Russia’s 2016 operation from the start:

Entail complicity in destroying the Deep State: I’m largely alone in this, but I believe that at least one of those quid pro quos raised the stakes of the inducements. If it is true — as I laid out here — that the Shadow Brokers operation dumping NSA exploits used the same infrastructure as the Guccifer 2.0 operation, it would mean the acceptance of the latter involved tacit participation in the former. More concretely, by the time Roger Stone started pursuing a Julian Assange pardon in October 2016, WikiLeaks was already sitting on the CIA hacking tools stolen by Joshua Schulte, tools that Schulte himself recognized would make it easy for Russia to identify CIA’s operations and assets; by the time Stone started intervening at the “highest levels of Government” for Assange, Trump’s own CIA Director had dubbed WikiLeaks a non-state hostile intelligence service. In other words, well before he was elected, Trump unwittingly entered a deal that would make him a participant in the willful destruction of the US security establishment to deliver on his side of the bargain.

Trump’s invented grievance about the 2016 election has led him to do the following:

And more recent disclosures — notably the HPSCI Report that served as a time machine to make Trump’s contacts with Russia go away — will make it far less likely that allies (like the Dutch) will share intelligence.

You could attribute all this to Trump’s grievances about the Deep State. At some point, though, that excuse begins to ring hollow.

But the effect of it is that Trump will walk into a meeting with Vladimir Putin today having rid himself of almost any competent advisors on Russia. He has, since he started clinging to the grievance Russia built into their 2016 election operation, aggressively eliminated all the people he would need to negotiate with Russia competently.

When Trump met with Putin in 2018, he was still advised by Fiona Hill, a genuine expert.

Hill was asked about her experiences at the summit in Helsinki, when Trump caused huge controversy by meeting Putin alone then appearing deferential in public, saying he took the Russian president at his word that he did not interfere in the US election in 2016 – a conclusion not supported by US intelligence and law enforcement.

Hill has previously said she was so appalled that she considered faking a sudden illness to stop the press conference.

“I also thought about pulling the fire alarm, but I didn’t know what Finnish was for ‘fire alarm’,” Hill said, to laughter.

More seriously, Hill said, the Putin press conference “was one of the most humiliating episodes of all time.

[snip]

“The issue was really the press conference itself. We knew that it was going to be difficult. I’d actually recommended against a press conference. My word didn’t have much coinage in that environment but one of the reasons was because Trump admires Putin so much, he never wants to be humiliated. And it was all about a personal sense of humiliation.

“The instance in which he was asked the question about whether he felt that the Russians interfered in the election, he wanted to push back very quickly against it. He wanted to diminish any kind of idea of that because if … he wanted to get the message across that nobody had interfered on his behalf.”

He got his ass handed to him. It was an utter humiliation for Trump and for the United States.

But this time, having soiled himself in Helsinki, Trump will go into a solo meeting with Putin having been advised by sycophants at best, including those who proudly spout Russian Useful Idioms.

Share this entry
46 replies
  1. Mike from Delaware says:

    Imagine a world where the President acts on the advice of a capable, competent and intelligent adviser like Fiona Hill.

    • wa_rickf says:

      We’ll be lucky if the U.S. still has a state of Alaska this evening. If not, Sarah really will be able to see Russia from her front porch.

      (Gotta love Trump’s deal-making).

    • drhester says:

      I have listened several times to podcasts with Michael Wolff, the guy who wrote 4 books about Trump. He reiterates over and over that DT never listens to anyone. Ever. He does what he wants, says what he wants for that moment alone. Never is foresight involved. Wolff surmises that this Trump-Putin pow pow, which initially was slated to include Zelinsky, is all about a distraction from the Epstein sh*tshow. DT apparently said to his inner circle, “I need something big”….

  2. PedroVermont says:

    AF One just lifted off from Andrews after a long ground roll for the 3500 mile trip. 7 hour flight would normally be used for further preparation by the President. probably not this time though.

    The proper and only practical goal of this meeting would be agreement on another meeting. I could be wrong, but my guess is today will generate little to no progress.

  3. Peterr says:

    Trump hates being told he is wrong or will lose.

    He hates it when his lawyers tell him that.
    He hates it when judges tell him that.
    He hates it when the intelligence agencies tell him that.
    He hates it when foreign leaders tell him that.
    Most of all, he hates it when the media tell him that.

    As I said two years ago, Trump will cling to his Lloyd Christmas 1-in-a-million chance — that one judge, that one lawyer, that one intelligence person — that tells him he’s right. And right now, Putin is that guy.

    Which gives Putin power.

    And Putin knows it. I can hear him now, making his opening pitch at the beginning of this meeting in Alaska, behind closed doors with just Putin, Trump, and Putin’s interpreter . . .

    “You need me, Donald.
    To show the world that you are right and all of them are wrong.
    To get the vindication you are due.
    To get the revenge you long to deliver.
    To get the accolades and rewards you so richly deserve.
    You need me, Donald.

    You don’t need Zelenskyy.
    You don’t need Starmer or Merz or Macron or the rest of the EU so-called leaders.
    You don’t need the dweebs in Congress or the deep state fools at Foggy Bottom, the Pentagon, and Langley.
    You don’t need the O-So-Important media pundits.
    You don’t need the ivory tower historians.

    You need me, because together we can bend them all to our will.
    You can prove them to be wrong.
    You can prove them to be stupid.
    You can prove them to be weak.
    You need me.

    And this is what I need from you . . .”

  4. Ginevra diBenci says:

    “Useful Idioms.” Now it’s Gabbard, Patel, and Ratcliffe. I’m a huge fan of coinages and idiosyncratic usages. I just can’t follow this one, where individual incompetent sycophants–each compromised in his or her own way–become figures of speech. While I love the proximity of idiom to idiot in terms of sound, that breaks down on the level of sense.

    This is not a criticism as much as a request for explication.

    • P J Evans says:

      I recall in HS my German teacher, for the first-year class, handed out a sheet headed “Idioms For Us Idiots”. (It was a very useful list of idioms.)

    • Reader 21 says:

      I believe it’s because, as Marcy pointed out in a recent post, they all fell for a document fabricated by Russian intelligence that included a Russian idiom no native English speaker would ever say, and should have tipped them off instantly as to it’s provenance and as being fraudulent. But they were so blinded by their eagerness to smear Hillary— and folks working to protect Americans from Russian active measures— they dutifully did the work of Russian spies for them. (Stalin used to call those in the West who parroted Soviet propaganda as “useful idiots.”)

      • Ginevra diBenci says:

        Nice to meet you, Reader 21! I turned my own brain inside out on this one, but failed to reach your explanation, which comes the closest to making sense of anything I can imagine.

        EW’s catch (the Russian tinge of “oil on the fire”) remains the most compelling gotcha evidence of the hoax-iness of Trump’s (meaning: Russia’s) “HOAX.” That and Trump’s groveling behavior toward Putin for the past decade (at least) and his and his enablers’ inexorable execution of Putin’s original vision, which was to bring America down to his own degraded, authoritarian level and humiliate us before the world.

        • Reader 21 says:

          Nice to meet you also, Ginerva—and yes, I agree completely with all that. Putin can ill afford to have his countrymen and women —many of whom live in abject squalor—asking pesky questions about where the rubles have all gone (why, shunted off to the ‘evil West’, of course). Bringing down America serves as one helluva distraction (among other objectives).

      • Savage Librarian says:

        It’s all part of vranyo grooming:

        “You know I’m lying, and I know that you know, and you know that I know that you know, but I go ahead with a straight face, and you nod seriously and take notes.”

        “But when a government does vranyo, the nature of the fabrication can change. We may well be talking about “the big lie”, and the reason for vranyo might not be evasiveness, but contempt.”

        https://theconversation.com/ukraine-war-vranyo-russian-for-when-you-lie-and-everyone-knows-it-but-you-dont-care-181100

  5. Savage Librarian says:

    Sacrifices

    Headline day
    as you are marauding to browbeat
    Snide abettor man
    with swag to hide deceit
    You try hard to double-talk it
    Putin’s spin pup just can’t lock it
    And we’ll hear it said
    as you make your retreat

    May your child sacrifices vex your repose
    May an elephant transgress you
    with its nose
    May your life be plagued
    with bummers that we chose
    May your child sacrifices vex your repose

    Your laundry man is one of your best bros
    Yes, he really knows the drill
    and how to close
    When he called you, you came grinning
    Then you dropped that dime, for spinning
    And we heard it said
    as you reached new lows:

    May your child sacrifices vex your repose
    May an elephant transgress you
    with its nose
    May your life be plagued
    with bummers that we chose
    May your child sacrifices vex your repose

    You were way behind one day
    in your campaign
    That’s when Putin thought:
    That’s right up my terrain
    You’re deep in his hip pocket
    A primary ball-and-socket
    Standing by unsightly
    You betray Ukraine

    May your child sacrifices vex your repose
    May an elephant transgress you
    with its nose
    May your life be plagued
    with bummers that we chose
    May your child sacrifices vex your repose

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ugcKt9R4TLc&pp=0gcJCf8Ao7VqN5tD

    Little Jimmy Dickens – May The Bird Of Paradise Fly Up Your Nose 1965

    • Ginevra diBenci says:

      SL, For maybe the first time, despite my curiosity about its inspiration the more I read of this one the less I wanted to see that it had any source text at all. It really has stand-alone quality. Those first eight lines gave that old thrill I used to feel when I was teaching and a student had one of those crystalline moments where skill soars to subject and it all just snaps.

      I mean…you made me conceive of “snide” as a verb. What more can I say?

  6. wa_rickf says:

    ***This really just happened***

    Bill: What’s going on?
    Rick: Commenting at Fox
    Bill: Why? What’s going on?
    Rick: Trump and Putin are meeing in Alaska at a military base at 11a this morning PDT
    Bill: Really? In Alaska? Why?
    Rick: To talk about ending the war Ukraine and for Trump to ‘listen’ and determine if Putin is serious. Why do you not know this?

  7. zscoreUSA says:

    That Trump took in crazy influencer Laura Loomer and fired NSC personnel is itself crazy. Trump must view her opinion as coming from thee highest authority. And the scoop gets leaked to Barak Ravid, of all people.

    https://www.axios.com/2025/04/03/trump-laura-loomer-fire-national-security-council

    For Carter Page, I still suspect him of being deep state, and whether or not every thing involving him is subject to release now Trump would factor in what narrative warfare value it would have. I know it’s been discussed here that can’t be because of the connection to a Russian think tank, I still can’t shake that suspicion.

    • wa_rickf says:

      Trump did not “taken in” Laura, she is actually respected by Trump for her research and he appreciates her loyalty and fealty to him. In MAGA-world, she has earned her place in having Trump’s ear and attention.

      Having stated above, the woman is batcrap crazy and is a Q-conspiracy spreader. Currently, she and MTG are verbally at war with each other, accusing each other of roast beef-like body parts, and just this week, Laura, in a deposition to HBO lawyers (because Laura is suing Bill Maher for making a joke that Laura and Trump slept together) said that she is under oath and cannot lie, that Trump’s inner circle said that Lindsey Graham is in fact gay. (How that came up…I don’t have the context.)

      Probably more than you wanted to know about Laura.

      • Reader 21 says:

        A trio over at the Bulwark did a pod on this very depo the other day—highly recommend if you’re looking for a good laugh. OMG she’s even more bananas than I thought though.

        • zscoreUSA says:

          Bananas, yet as Emptywheel has also pointed out a few times, Trump views as untouchable.

          Bananas, yet, under the plausible guise of America First and Loyalty to Trump, she can waltz into (pun intended) the White House and affect staffing at NSC (and potentially DOD).

          So bananas, the in her rift with MTG, MTG comes across as sane and logical.

  8. ernesto1581 says:

    sorry for OT, but two subtly(?) contrasting communications came down last two days re 90th Anniversary of Social Security, one to SS recipients and the other to the nation at large.

    “Today, Commissioner Bisignano also joined President Donald J. Trump at the White House as the President issued a presidential proclamation, recommitting to always defend Social Security…” (Bisignano’s letter to SS recipients, 8/14/25)

    “…we recommit to strengthening our retirement system, protecting programs like Social Security and Medicare against fraud and abuse, and ensuring that every future generation of American citizens has the income security they need and earned.” (Presidential Proclamation, 8/14/25)
    ****************
    ps. Fionna Hill thinks Trump may have the advantage this time because he is a) liable to say whatever the hell comes to mind at any given moment; b) Putin will therefore not be able to make his case, there being “… no witnesses, nobody to write this down. Nobody to do some kind of action-oriented outtakes.”

    pps. “roast beef-like body parts”?? amazing.

      • ernesto1581 says:

        no reason to opt out when this kind of bullshit is going down. read it, then add it to the compost.

    • Joe Orton says:

      Hill should know better. Disappointing of her. All Putin has to say is- how about TWO Trump towers in Moscow- and Trump will get focused real quick. Or, Hey Trump, look at this piece of proof that we helped you get elected! Or all of the above. Fiona Hill shouldn’t be pulling such wool over her own eyes.

  9. Joe Orton says:

    Just watched Leon Panetta on msnbc speculating that Trump is being cultivated as a source by Putin. Duh. But still stunning to hear.

    I hope I’m still alive when the reign of and war with Baby Men/Man Children ends. I hope it turns out we are living peak Baby Man right now.

    • gmokegmoke says:

      The Council of Grandmothers, a group of elders from the indigenous communities around the world, called people like Putin and Trmp “moys” back in 2016. Moys are little boys in middle-aged and older men’s bodies. I’ve found it to be a useful concept.

  10. misnomer bjet says:

    And today Trump is talking about Putin’s genes. What I would give to be a fly on the wall of the conversation he wrestles with there.

    But this time, having proudly soiled himself with the imprimatur of his Sharpie on the offshoring (so to speak) of our native IC’s means of credible public ‘dissent’ (not the word, nor to be —utterly— confused with the longtime GOP ‘donor class’ goal of ’freeing’ every last dreg of functional democracy for first dibs at the back alley chop shop) to the extent that he has, Putin will not be the only one filling the vacuum with better-informed and shape-charged muddying of the waters.

    • misnomer bjet says:

      It certainly wasn’t USA who swindled Catherine the Great into forking over the cannon fodder and other resources for the Crimean War, or swindled her good Tsarist “genes” into selling Alaska to the highest bidder in order to (as one genius on MSNBC put it) dig himself out of debt for.

      • P J Evans says:

        ISTR that we sent *them* troops back in the early 20th century. They sent us their best engineers, as a result of their policies. (My father had one in college, and got one job as a result of knowing him, years later.)

  11. PedroVermont says:

    Good news, I think. White House is now reporting the meeting will include more individuals. Trump will have Rubio and Witkoff as his wingmen for the meeting.

      • PedroVermont says:

        A premise of this blog is that Trump alone in the meeting would not be good. I agree with that conclusion.

      • earlofhuntingdon says:

        It’s good in that Trump will not be alone with Putin, which would make it easier for Putin to manipulate Trump, although it’s painfully easy at the best of times.

        As you know, witnesses make it harder to present fundamentally different takes on a meeting. But Trump hates process and thinks he is the smartest guy and negotiator in any room, a laughable conceit.

        Putin is also fluent in both Russian and English. Trump can barely manage English, which gives Putin twice the time to choose his words. No word on translators and note takers, but they are usually not named.

        • PedroVermont says:

          Exactly. Seward’s folly is safe and we don’t have to erase a star from Old Glory, at least not yet.

  12. Memory hole says:

    A few days back, Heather Cox Richardson made a good point about Putin coming to America.

    “Putin generally cannot travel outside Russia because he has been indicted by the International Criminal Court for war crimes, including the theft of Ukrainian children.
    And yet, Trump is welcoming him to the United States of America.”

    Disgraceful. But Trump does have a soft spot for those who traffic or harm children. Or women.

    • PedroVermont says:

      Same for Netanyahu who has traveled here several times since being indicted for crimes against humanity. The US not being a member of the ICC is a factor.

  13. N.E. Brigand says:

    A few days ago, Trump said twice that he was going to Russia rather than Alaska to meet Putin. These comments were understandably mocked as further evidence of his mental deterioration. But as Marcy noted on Twitter or Bluesky, Alex Raufoglu soon reported that “Apparently, Trump was not misspeaking. Sources tell me that there are indeed plans for Trump to briefly cross into russia after meeting with Putin in Alaska on Friday. This is going to more look like Trump-Kim DMZ summit.”

    That seemed pretty unlikely (and unpractical: there’s no land border between Russia and the U.S.). And it didn’t happen today. Trump and Putin met in Anchorage, which is nearly 700 miles from Russia. Was there really ever a plan for this to happen? Or was someone spinning Raufoglu?

    In any case, on Air Force One en route to the summit, Trump told Fox News’ Bret Baier that if no Ukraine deal were to be reached, he would depart the summit without holding a press conference and “go back to the United States.”

    From Alaska. Which is in the United States.

Comments are closed.