How the Deep State Taught Stephen Miller to Love Socialism
Recent reporting suggests that the CIA — more than Trump’s other top intelligence advisors — continues to give the President unvarnished advice. And by yoking that advice to spectacular covert operative success (and probably a good deal of boasting to the press), the CIA seems to be building value with Trump and his stupider advisors (with the exception of the deliberately stupidest, Steve Witkoff).
Remain in Ukraine
Take Ukraine. A recent profile of how the US betrayed Ukraine describes the CIA has remained there fighting.
But there was a counternarrative, spooled out largely in secret. At its center was the C.I.A.
Where Mr. Hegseth had marginalized his Ukraine-supporting generals, the C.I.A. director, Mr. Ratcliffe, had consistently protected his own officers’ efforts for Ukraine. He kept the agency’s presence in the country at full strength; funding for its programs there even increased. When Mr. Trump ordered the March aid freeze, the U.S. military rushed to shut down all intelligence sharing. But when Mr. Ratcliffe explained the risk facing C.I.A. officers in Ukraine, the White House allowed the agency to keep sharing intelligence about Russian threats inside Ukraine.
CIA didn’t just remain in Ukraine collecting intelligence. They’ve played a role in Ukraine’s spectacular success in using drone attacks to degrade Russia’s security.
In June, beleaguered U.S. military officers met with their C.I.A. counterparts to help craft a more concerted Ukrainian campaign. It would focus exclusively on oil refineries and, instead of supply tanks, would target the refineries’ Achilles’ heel: A C.I.A. expert had identified a type of coupler that was so hard to replace or repair that a refinery would remain offline for weeks. (To avoid backlash, they would not supply weapons and other equipment that Mr. Vance’s allies wanted for other priorities.)
Russia no doubt understands the CIA remains intelligent (heh) and focused on its original adversary. When they recruited Witkoff to manage Trump’s capitulation, they specifically ordered him not to bring CIA.
Steve Witkoff, a billionaire real-estate developer and longtime golfing partner of Donald Trump, was just days into his job as the new president’s special envoy to the Middle East when he received a tantalizing message from the crown prince of Saudi Arabia.
Vladimir Putin was interested in meeting Witkoff—so interested that he might consider releasing an American prisoner to him. The invitation came from a Kremlin moneyman named Kirill Dmitriev, using the de facto Saudi ruler, Mohammed bin Salman, as an intermediary.
There was just one thing: Witkoff would be expected to come alone, without any CIA handlers, diplomats or even an interpreter, a person familiar with the outreach said.
And Witkoff, obedient to Putin’s demands, continues to refuse CIA briefings.
Witkoff has declined multiple offers from the CIA for a briefing on Russia.
[snip]
Ahead of his trip, the CIA offered to brief Witkoff; he declined. Nor was he accompanied by an interpreter: He had been told that Russia’s president wouldn’t allow him to bring another person into the meeting.
A White House official said he participated in multiple briefings before his first trip to Russia, including Trump’s intelligence briefing. The CIA regularly briefs him on other issues like Gaza—but not Russia.
Inform Trump that Ukraine did not strike Russia
The thing is, the ability to provide accurate intelligence and (I assume this was more important) really cool attacks that make the attacker look strong appears to be increasing the CIA’s value to Trump.
Not only did CIA conclude (unsurprisingly) that Putin was lying when he recently claimed that Ukraine had attempted to target his residence,
The CIA has assessed Ukraine was not targeting a residence used by Russian President Vladimir Putin in a recent drone attack in the north of his country, according to US officials, undercutting an assertion the Russian leader had made to President Donald Trump in a Monday phone call.
The CIA’s director John Ratcliffe briefed Trump on the assessment Wednesday, the officials said.
Russia had publicly raised allegations Ukraine attempted to hit Putin’s home Monday, and Trump told reporters Putin had told him of it over the phone. At the time, the president said he was troubled by the reported action, seeming to believe the Russian leader even as Ukraine strenuously denied it was behind any such attack.
“I don’t like it. It’s not good,” Trump said, describing himself as “very angry” upon hearing the claim.
But in the wake of Ratcliffe’s briefing, Trump has repeated that conclusion.
President Donald Trump on Sunday told reporters that U.S. officials have determined that Ukraine did not target a residence belonging to Russian President Vladimir Putin in a drone attack last week, disputing Kremlin claims that Trump had initially greeted with deep concern.
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov last week said Ukraine launched a wave of drones at Putin’s state residence in the northwestern Novgorod region that the Russian defense systems were able to defeat. Lavrov also criticized Kyiv for launching the attack at a moment of intensive negotiations to end the war.
The allegation came just a day after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy had traveled to Florida for talks with Trump on the U.S. administration’s still-evolving 20-point plan aimed at ending the war. Zelenskyy quickly denied the Kremlin allegation.
Trump said that “something happened nearby” Putin’s residence but that Americans officials didn’t find the Russian president’s residence was targeted.
“I don’t believe that strike happened,” Trump told reporters as he traveled back to Washington on Sunday after spending two weeks at his home in Florida. “We don’t believe that happened, now that we’ve been able to check.”
Sure, this is just one instance, one single time when Trump believed his own spooks over Putin. But given that Trump first started to parrot obviously bullshit Russian claims eight years ago, in Helsinki, the fact that Trump would accept CIA’s judgment and in the process withstand an obvious attempt to pull Trump back towards capitulation, the instance feels momentous.
Venezuela central to success of operation
And given the CIA’s role in delivering one of the most sadistic thrills of this term, Trump may have no way back.
NYT dedicated an an entire story to describing how CIA (probably assisted by the $50 million reward the FBI offered) recruited someone within Maduro’s government who shared details of the dictators pattern of life.
The American spy agency, the people said, produced the intelligence that led to the capture of Mr. Maduro, monitoring his position and movements with a fleet of stealth drones that provided near constant monitoring over Venezuela, in addition to the information provided by its Venezuelan sources.
The C.I.A. had a group of officers on the ground in Venezuela working clandestinely beginning in August, according to a person familiar with the agency’s work. The officers gathered information about Mr. Maduro’s “pattern of life” and movements.
It is not clear how the C.I.A. recruited the Venezuelan source who informed the Americans of Mr. Maduro’s location. But former officials said the agency was clearly aided by the $50 million reward the U.S. government offered for information leading to Mr. Maduro’s capture.
Given how volatile things are in Venezuela, the CIA may not be able to sustain this person’s loyalty (or life, not least because Trump has made it a lot harder to support assets in various ways).
But for now, the CIA is taking credit for a key role in one of Trump’s only successes — and Trump is boasting of their work (again, in ways that may get assets in the field killed).
Advise Trump to keep regime members
Even before that success, though, CIA advised — and Trump heeded their advice — to stick with a Maduro loyalist to govern after his snatching. WSJ reports that senior Trump officials asked for this analysis weeks before the snatch.
Senior Trump administration officials commissioned the CIA to undertake the analytical assessment and debated it during discussions about day-after plans for Venezuela, the people said. The people familiar with the assessment said they were unsure of the precise date it was produced.
The report was briefed to Trump in recent weeks, according to two of the people.
The assessment didn’t describe how Maduro could lose power, or advocate for removing him, but attempted to gauge the domestic situation in Venezuela in the event that he did, people familiar with it said.
The intelligence report, the people said, cited Rodríguez and two other top Venezuelan regime figures as possible interim rulers who could keep order. The people familiar with the assessment didn’t identify the other two officials, but besides Rodríguez, the two most influential power brokers are Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello and Defense Minister Vladimir Padrino.
This advice may well backfire in the near term. It is undoubtedly the case that a Chavista will have far more ability to sustain order. But particularly given Trump’s belated realization that the oil won’t pay for itself — and the US government will have to subsidize oil development, it will very quickly sour at least some of the people most excited by this invasion, the Cuban-American community.
And ultimately, the Administration has gone all in with Chavistas who rule through brutal repression, as Stephen Miller said in that batshit interview with Jake Tapper where he also repeatedly said that Venezuela is an island.
For those who may be indicted, the best choice they can possibly make is to be part of a constructive decision-making process for the future of Venezuela. The best decision they can make is to cooperate fully and completely with the United States to be part of building this brighter future for Venezuela.
When Miller envisions cooperating with the other people who were indicted, he’s stating that he’s happy to cooperate with Diosdado Cabello, who has been far more involved in the day-to-day trafficking than Maduro, and who is very much an ideological Chavista.
Stephen Miller went on TV — around the same time as Trump said he was going to give welfare to oil companies so they could benefit Venezuela — and bragged about working with precisely the socialists he has defined his entire existence in opposition to.
John Ratcliffe’s CIA, the Deep State! after building Donald Trump’s trust over a year, convinced Stephen Miller to love socialists.
Ratcliffe bypassed the DNI gatekeeper
Meanwhile, Tulsi has remained silent since the snatch.
Leaving people to mock her past statements predicting precisely what is happening in Venezuela.
Tulsi almost lost her job in advance of the Iran strikes after posting a video warning of World War III.
It’s not necessarily a good thing that Tulsi’s skepticism is being supplanted with Ratcliffe’s willingness to go big on covert operations. Both of them suck. Neither can offer wise counsel to Trump (but both likely know Venezuela is not an island).
But at least some reality has begun to seep into Trump’s thinking.
Wow! Lots of great information and analysis here. Discussing the various individuals in the Trump 2.0 Administration is like going through the DSM-5-TR manual of psychiatric disorders! From Stephen Miller’s paranoid xenophobia to Tulsi Gabbard’s delusional ideation to Ratcliffe’s passive/aggressive personality disorder – these are a bunch of dysfunctional loonies! The details about the monitoring of Maduro is fascinating as well. Some great HUMINT described here (a cook or a butler maybe inside the Maduro compound?) and the secret drone monitoring is intriguing. Question: If we can monitor Maduro so closely why can’t we (or the Ukrainians) do the same to Putin and take him out? That would be far more substantive than nabbing a tinhorn South American dictator!
Who is the we?
The same royal ‘we’ it always is.
Sorry, not trying to hijack, but can’t figure out how to send a message about this Epstein story.
https://kaitjustice.substack.com/p/the-woman-nobody-asks-about-is-the
Please don’t let this derail the Miller/Socialism thread.
Thank you for posting this. It fleshes out a lot of things I have been looking into. How interesting that de Rothschild lost his position because of allegations of a sex scandal. I find the trajectory of her rise quite remarkable.
I’m reminded of John Bolton’s remark about Trump – that the last person in the room with Trump usually prevails in arguments. Trump’s cognitive decline and disdain for logical thinking are showing. He’s no doubt being bombarded with competing visions from Miller, Rubio, and Vance in the WH and external players like oil executives. He remembers only snippets and repeats to the press what he remembers.
It is time for Congress and the press to be figuring out who is in charge because Trump is losing it.
As the histories of Allen Dulles and Bill Barr, to name only two figures, would suggest, the CIA prides itself on being able to win bureaucratic as well as hot wars, whether foreign or domestic.
Sure. But who would ever had assumed Ratcliffe had it in him.
Exactly. Maybe he has family who have influenced him.
Since reading SMITH’s testimony recently, I’m reminded that Cassidy Hutchinson said that RATCLIFFE said he wanted TRUMP etal to give up on contesting the 2020 election.
It’s the fourth VIDEO down, here:
https://xcancel.com/atrupar/status/1541834287334432769
Jun 28, 2022 · 5:21 PM UTC
Nice catch Harpie
Yes, excellent work, harpie. (So glad you’re back, too. I was getting worried about you. Hope all is well.)
Thank you, VP!
And Thank YOU, SL! I’m fine…going through a reclusive stage, I guess…I did mean to check in several times as I attempted to keep up with the reading but found it all just too much…maybe over a hump, now. :-)
This Ratcliffe thing echoes (sort of) something I remember from Tim Weiner’s “The Mission” CIA book:
Despite whatever reservations one might have had about Gina Haspel and/or Mike Pompeo, they both did some good work against Russia’s manipulations in Ukraine despite all the Giuliani fuckery to benefit Trump and therefore Russia, too. They just didn’t tell Trump or try to convince him of anything. (That aspect is different than Ratcliffe here.)
I’m not going to re-read it. I just remember that stuck out to me as something I’d either been unaware of or had forgotten. I don’t remember whether you, Marcy, ever had anything on that or not. Doesn’t matter. Either way, you’re the best.
Thanks for this site.
Socialism? Did someone say “socialism”? The headline from the Guardian this morning:
“Trump suggests US taxpayers could reimburse oil firms for Venezuela investment”
“President says a ‘tremendous amount of money’ will need to be spent repairing country’s infrastructure”
And this from NPR’s Morning Edition:
“An inside look at Venezuela’s critical gold trade”
Someone at one of the oil companies must have given him facts about VZ’s oil-producing system. It will take a lot of money and time to get it up to where The Felon Guy wants.
Well, sure, why not? They’ll justify by taking more away from SNAP, etc.
Maybe the deal was to rid Venezuela of its Cuban reliance/burden in exchange for leaving the country alone as the US watches Cuba fall first? That would be the midterm aim of the Trump/ExPat Cuban regime.
The expats who remember Cuba-before-1970 are all old. They aren’t going to get the Cuba of their memories and imaginations back.
That grievance gets past down as evidenced by the actions of Aileen Cannon, Enrique Tarrio, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz. Dayton, Ohio gets its fair share of refugees from all parts of the world and this group was one of them. The sons and daughters of these expats are rabid to avenge their “losses”. In quotes because due to their minority status they became quite wealthy and yet maintain that minority status.
That could explain Rubio’s agenda — he’d willingly bork all other past US foreign policy to avenge his Cuban family and other exiles’ losses.
It is honestly difficult for me to believe that Rubio and the constellation of ex-pats around him have held a grudge this long, but I honestly can’t come up with another explanation for most of what Rubio has been up to in the Trump 2.0 “administration”.
I know we’re still re-litigating the end of the American Civil War, but I thought Rubio was smarter than that.
This past year has been an education to everyone who “thought Rubio was smarter than that” that, in fact, he was not, is not, and never will be. He performed “smart senator” in public, and did it better than we realized, which is likely why Trump picked him.
Trump never chooses as a cabinet figure anyone who is smarter than himself–a terrifying prospect we need to keep in mind whenever we feel the impulse to vest our hopes in any of them.
It’s not about smarts. It’s about the reptilian brain and the feels, the vibes — and yes, they are very long and old, because they’ve fed and built upon grievance for decades. To keep the Trump-supporting Cuban American segment in the fenceline, they are willing to smash and grab just as they are for US oil-igarchs.
Rubio’s revenge is a made up political device he needed to be successful in South Florida. His family left Cuba years before Castro took over for reasons Rubio has never made clear.
It isn’t just the cost of getting VZ oil up and flowing, the value is substantially lower that other oil, and there is an oversupplly of oil and gas due to rapid imcreases in renewables and to massive US oil production.
This article in Wired seems to be a good introduction to the cost/benefit of VZ oil production: https://www.wired.com/story/trump-wants-venezuelas-oil-getting-it-might-not-be-so-simple/
Not to mention that the petroleum is heavy [tar] & sour [sulphur]. Plus its ‘proven’ volume likely wildly overstated.
Took me a bit to backtrack to find this graphic but I think one if not the key driver behind seizing Maduro is implied control of marketshare. It doesn’t have to be developed; if 18% of proven oil reserves are removed from the market, who benefits from the decreased supply?
I’ve emphasized Venezuela’s portion of proven reserves to make my point.
Note Nigeria’s location in the OPEC portion of the graph; note also how Trump has used military force this week to protect Christians in Nigeria from alleged persecution.
Offering a theory about why – yes, oil is a side benefit/gift to oil companies and the whole operation is a way of flexing muscles and all that, but Venezuela was front and center in a 2020 election manipulation fever dream/conspiracy theory (recall the Kraken lady on Foxnews about the Dominion and Smartmatic voting machines ability to change votes?) Could they be looking to revive that whole lie to provide justification for calling off or questioning the legitimacy of the 2028 midterms? There have been several reports that the US was “negotiating” with Maduro and he was refusing to do what they wanted – with no details as to the request was. Could it be “do me a favor”, like he asked Zelensky on that perfect phone call?
IIRC, at the time they were claiming it was Italy. Venezuela wasn’t even mentioned.
No – she went on Foxnews and it was all about Venezuela:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/19/technology/sidney-powell-venezuela.html
There’s a little possibly relevant information here:
https://www.emptywheel.net/2026/01/05/stephen-miller-and-plans-for-post-decapitation/#comment-1122754