Peter King, Movie Mogul

Peter King, the former terrorist sympathizer conducting witch hunts against alleged terrorist sympathizers, is not one to assail others for their gross hypocrisy. And technically, that’s not what his complaint about apparent Administration plans to cooperate in an Osama bin Laden Fuck Yeah movie set to release just as voters start thinking about the November election. King is purportedly less concerned about the Administration’s glaring hypocrisy on leaks and more concerned about leaks in general. Though given his silence about this leak fest, I’d wager he’s most concerned that voters might learn that it took a Democratic Administration to actually hunt down OBL.

In response to King’s request and in response to a preliminary review, DOD has promised to start an investigation into the charges immediately.

The CIA’s response was more ambiguous. It noted that,

The CIA’s Office of Public Affairs handles requests for information from the entertainment industry. According to a senior official from that office, the protection of national security equities–including the preservation of our ability to conduct effective counterterrorism operations–is the decisive factor in determining how the CIA engages with filmmakers and the media as a whole.

It seems to me this policy allows CIA to cooperate with Hollywood if doing so would make Americans enthusiastically support exciting operations against big movie villains. It allows CIA to cooperate with Hollywood to ensure CIA gets full credit for offing OBL (even if that slights the SEALs involved). In other words, there’s a whole lot that might be fall under CIA’s own definition of what might “preserv[e its] ability to conduct effective counterterrorism operations.” All the more so under a Director who’s a bit of a media magnet.

In any case, it’d be nice if King’s claimed stance towards classified information…

The Administration’s first duty in declassifying material is to provide full reporting to Congress and the American people, in an effort to build public trust through transparency of government. In contrast, this alleged collaboration belies a desire of transparency in favor of a cinematographic view of history.

Was embraced by anyone in DC, Democrat or GOP.

But King, for his own part, has been working so hard to create a different villain, I doubt we’ll get it from him, either.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

11 Responses to Peter King, Movie Mogul

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @chooglinondown2 It's his job, and most of it is laudable--this should be teaching moment of all the corps not taking this seriously.
emptywheel @digby56 I took it to be an "attack on" "1) freedom of expression" & "2) way of life." @ddayen
emptywheel @ColMorrisDavis Argh. Sorry.
emptywheel @matthewstoller @ddayen's potential exposure notwithstanding, think more Americans still more fucked by Target hack. @digby56
emptywheel @ddayen LOL. I'm like you: obscurity through non-lucrative cybertarget, as opposed to Target, shopping @digby56
emptywheel @ddayen Do you feel like your way of life has been attacked? More than, say, your Target habits? @digby56
emptywheel @digby56 True. Should have said former. However one you're way too familiar with!
emptywheel @bungdan I'm glad they are though. Not least bc it'll work better in google searches.
emptywheel @digby56 To be fair, they did kind of attack your way of life.
emptywheel NK attacked our "way of life"?
emptywheel NatSec types now insist we defend freedom of speech in face of terrorist threats. Huh. Lots of silenced people could speak to that.
January 2012
« Dec   Feb »