NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

Perhaps six months late, the NYT figured out (with no sense of irony about that delay) that if Ray Kelly can spy on Muslims with impunity–as he appears to have done–he can do it to anyone.

It is a distressing fact of life that mistreatment of Muslims does not draw nearly the protest that it should. But not just Muslims are threatened by this seemingly excessive warrantless surveillance and record-keeping. Today Muslims are the target. In the past it was protesters against the Vietnam War, civil rights activists, socialists. Tomorrow it will be another vulnerable group whose lawful behavior is blended into criminal activity.

The editorial focuses on one of the many areas that should have offered a reasonable middle ground months ago: if it’s true nothing is wrong with this spying, than the NYPD should provide more information about what leads the cops were actually following.

Mr. Bloomberg has reacted in the worst possible way — with disdain — to those raising legitimate questions about the surveillance program. Asking about its legality, and about whether alienating innocent Muslims is a smart or decent strategy, does not translate into being soft on terrorism, or failing to appreciate that it is a dangerous world.

The mayor insists that the actions reported by The A.P. were “legal,” “appropriate” and “constitutional.” He also says the police were only “following leads.” But he has yet to explain what sort of leads, why they justify police surveillance of so many Muslims, or whether the type of surveillance depicted in the news reports continues.

If only the NYT knew of a newspaper that employed some good reporters who could do some reporting on such questions. I wonder where they might find that?

Perhaps most curious, though, is the NYT’s focus on Bloomberg, not Kelly, even while they admit that this program is Kelly’s baby.

It’s all a very curious focus from the NYT.

But it’s a good start.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective @R_Ephemeral @walterwkatz To paint the picture to explain the other conduct.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @regretblues Interesting. thanks.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @FSIStanford: Taubman: Presumably the Senate Intelligence Committee was aware of everything Snowden exposed. No, says Feinstein. #Securi
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @FSIStanford: Feinstein: We don't know who or how, but Leon Panetta had asked his staff to "assess" what our Intelligence Committee was …
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin Yeah. I bet @ddayen could invent some competition that would distinguish Spelling wasp from fruit fly.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin I'd say a POTUS debate but they'd look good by comparison, I guess.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adambonin Why not make them face off in skills neither is good at, like all good reality shows?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Aaand there are now a ton of SD Police on motorcycles. Moving on to previously planned destination...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Previous tweet: this is a demonstration against Border Patrol violence.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How can something as cutthroat as the Spelling Bee end in a tie? It's not right.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @PhoenixWomanMN: @bmaz And the media cheerfully went along with it.
3hreplyretweetfavorite