NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

Perhaps six months late, the NYT figured out (with no sense of irony about that delay) that if Ray Kelly can spy on Muslims with impunity–as he appears to have done–he can do it to anyone.

It is a distressing fact of life that mistreatment of Muslims does not draw nearly the protest that it should. But not just Muslims are threatened by this seemingly excessive warrantless surveillance and record-keeping. Today Muslims are the target. In the past it was protesters against the Vietnam War, civil rights activists, socialists. Tomorrow it will be another vulnerable group whose lawful behavior is blended into criminal activity.

The editorial focuses on one of the many areas that should have offered a reasonable middle ground months ago: if it’s true nothing is wrong with this spying, than the NYPD should provide more information about what leads the cops were actually following.

Mr. Bloomberg has reacted in the worst possible way — with disdain — to those raising legitimate questions about the surveillance program. Asking about its legality, and about whether alienating innocent Muslims is a smart or decent strategy, does not translate into being soft on terrorism, or failing to appreciate that it is a dangerous world.

The mayor insists that the actions reported by The A.P. were “legal,” “appropriate” and “constitutional.” He also says the police were only “following leads.” But he has yet to explain what sort of leads, why they justify police surveillance of so many Muslims, or whether the type of surveillance depicted in the news reports continues.

If only the NYT knew of a newspaper that employed some good reporters who could do some reporting on such questions. I wonder where they might find that?

Perhaps most curious, though, is the NYT’s focus on Bloomberg, not Kelly, even while they admit that this program is Kelly’s baby.

It’s all a very curious focus from the NYT.

But it’s a good start.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel What if NK (from whom we partly reverse engineered SERE) just said, "We were trying to teach Sony 'learned helplessness'"?
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq It sounds so much more attractive when I put it that way but I promise, no rectal rehydration. @empiricalerror @0xabad1dea
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq Teaching a movie studio "learned helplessness"? @empiricalerror @0xabad1dea
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade My client (aka pup) was taking me out in the sun. But I think this is new bc different agency.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Banks failed in 2008 but then Turbo-Tax Timmeh hit the reset button. Voila! Win while failing.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Um. Banks?
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hi there "civil litigation" guy? How ya doing?? Guess you just blew past yer supposed arbitration clause, didn't you? #OhWellsBygonesBaybee!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @marciahofmann You think that's all they'll do. How could Chris Dodd pass up chance to make this into SOPA?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Think I'm gonna frame this tweet from Turdblossom. https://t.co/Mh4F8tt5FP
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @normative: True, albeit accidentally… MT @BuzzFeedAndrew: Rep Duncan calls DiFi “as much a traitor” as Snowden over CIA report. http://…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel OK, WH presser boys, was one of you GOING to ask a question about torture? Speak up!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @jason_koebler: Remember, China stole a goddamn stealth fighter from us & no one cared. http://t.co/KXcKY8cv7C http://t.co/bf5KTojZ09
1hreplyretweetfavorite