NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

Perhaps six months late, the NYT figured out (with no sense of irony about that delay) that if Ray Kelly can spy on Muslims with impunity–as he appears to have done–he can do it to anyone.

It is a distressing fact of life that mistreatment of Muslims does not draw nearly the protest that it should. But not just Muslims are threatened by this seemingly excessive warrantless surveillance and record-keeping. Today Muslims are the target. In the past it was protesters against the Vietnam War, civil rights activists, socialists. Tomorrow it will be another vulnerable group whose lawful behavior is blended into criminal activity.

The editorial focuses on one of the many areas that should have offered a reasonable middle ground months ago: if it’s true nothing is wrong with this spying, than the NYPD should provide more information about what leads the cops were actually following.

Mr. Bloomberg has reacted in the worst possible way — with disdain — to those raising legitimate questions about the surveillance program. Asking about its legality, and about whether alienating innocent Muslims is a smart or decent strategy, does not translate into being soft on terrorism, or failing to appreciate that it is a dangerous world.

The mayor insists that the actions reported by The A.P. were “legal,” “appropriate” and “constitutional.” He also says the police were only “following leads.” But he has yet to explain what sort of leads, why they justify police surveillance of so many Muslims, or whether the type of surveillance depicted in the news reports continues.

If only the NYT knew of a newspaper that employed some good reporters who could do some reporting on such questions. I wonder where they might find that?

Perhaps most curious, though, is the NYT’s focus on Bloomberg, not Kelly, even while they admit that this program is Kelly’s baby.

It’s all a very curious focus from the NYT.

But it’s a good start.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to NYT Finally Weighs in on CIA-on-the-Hudson

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @mariojrusso Over and over we've seen that when Feds allow themselves to rely on few providers (MIC, banks, KBR) bad things happen
36sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso When we tried to make JPMC & Citi play by rules stopped making loans @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso Good point but I fear once you have private SP they'll start cheating @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso & what incentive to use leverage to make better medical decisions? @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso Sure. But what incentive would they have to pass on? @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso Right now (bc of consolidation) we're headed to private SP. Dangerous @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncardozo I got to read my uncle's files on Apollo program after he died. All paper, no security, in the basement! @PogoWasRight @mattblaze
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mariojrusso I'm concerned abt that, especially given mandate @charles_gaba @xpostfactoid1 @armandodkos @princessmom122
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chrislhayes: effects that exacerbated mass incarceration on local level, and racist understandings of the issue. That said, it strikes …
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chrislhayes: That is to his great credit, because as damaging as the policies of the 90s were, the rhetoric was just as damaging. It cr…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chrislhayes: into the reactionary tropes around "super predators" and tough on crime. See his prescient '94 floor speech https://t.co/G
15mreplyretweetfavorite