Chain of Command: Some Violations of Military Discipline Are More Equal Than Others

The other day, Teddy Partridge noted a second instance of someone in the military–the previous one being the Commander-in-Chief–weighing in on Bradley Manning’s guilt.

Echoing his commander in chief in issuing statements that provide improper command influence in the trial of Bradley Manning, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Martin Dempsey, stated unequivocally that Manning broke the law.

To review, here’s what Barack Obama said when asked about Bradley Manning in April 2011:

And if you’re in the military… And I have to abide by certain rules of classified information. If I were to release material I weren’t allowed to, I’d be breaking the law.

We’re a nation of laws! We don’t let individuals make their own decisions about how the laws operate. He broke the law.

It appears that President Obama’s highest military officer agrees with him:

The Joint Chiefs chairman also was asked about Manning, the alleged WikiLeaks contributor, and whether Dempsey thought Manning should be viewed as a political prisoner, whistle-blower or traitor.

“We’re a nation of laws. He did violate the law,” Dempsey said.

Meanwhile, Staff Sergeant Robert Bales has not even been charged yet–his lawyer, John Henry Browne, says the military has neither forensics nor a confession incriminating him!–but Generals are sending Browne messages wishing him the best in his defense of Bales.

Browne added that he has received hundreds of emails, including from some generals and other military figures, who wished him luck in the case.

Don’t get me wrong. I hope Browne does his best to give Bales a robust defense. And as I’ve noted repeatedly, I’m not at all convinced that the killings occurred as the military currently claims they did; if so I hope Browne proves that, too.

But I would be shocked if any generals wrote David Coombs, Bradley Manning’s lawyer, to wish him luck in defending a tough, unpopular client. Yet both men–Manning and Bales–are alleged to have violated military discipline in ways that hurt our efforts.

Update: Fixed my misspelling of Bales’ name.

Tweet about this on Twitter96Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook85Google+1Email to someone

28 Responses to Chain of Command: Some Violations of Military Discipline Are More Equal Than Others

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @BernardKingIII @dcbigjohn I remember going into Juarez with my mom as in the 70's, and it was already a pretty scary endeavor.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Given existence of ICREACH, we ought to be a lot more interested in what FBI's doing with its PRTT program. http://t.co/IMlKwAF9Qk
54mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Methinks the Saudis doth protest too much about ISIS. http://t.co/WMscdZr6zL This is like their 8th disavowal in 2 weeks.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @marcsobel Turn toilet rolls into magic swords, the force cannot? @billmon1
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz People can talk+squawk ignorantly about the border, and control thereof, but they are politically motivated jackasses http://t.co/XVTrzpC9pB
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz You want horror of Juarez, go see @dcbigjohn feed of last 24 hrs. If you think that is representative, get your head out of your ass. #NOT
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz It was easy for @RubenGallego who I unconditionally supported, to be progressive, will he be so now? @downwithtyranny @ralonzo #TimeTells
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Will_Bunch One of these teams may arguably have better pitching than the other.
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong I may join, cause I currently have no dental plan #ThanksObama
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Also, al-Qaida and ISIS, right?
10hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong And, heck, parenting is HARD. I mean that. But this shit is just too much.
10hreplyretweetfavorite