Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

In the Senate Judiciary Committee’s markup of the FISA Amendments Act, Mike Lee, Dick Durbin, and Chris Chris Coons just tried, unsuccessfully, to require the government to get a warrant before it searched US person communications collected via the targeting of non-US person under the FISA Amendments Act. It was, as Dianne Feinstein said, not dissimilar from an amendment Ron Wyden and Mark Udall had tried to pass when FAA was marked up before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The debate revealed new confirmation that the government is wiretapping American citizens in the guise of foreign surveillance.

DiFi argued that the amendment would have impeded the government to pursue Nidal Hassan by delaying the time when they could have reviewed his communication (presumably with Anwar al-Awlaki). Of course, the amendment included an emergency provision that would have permitted such a search after the effect.

More telling, though, was Whitehouse’s response. He referred back to his time using warrants as a US Attorney, and said that requiring a warrant to access the US person communication would “kill this program,” and that to think warrants “fundamentally misapprehends the way in which this program operates.”

Now, I’d be more sympathetic to Whitehouse here if, back when this bill was originally argued, his amendments requiring FISC oversight of minimization after the fact had passed. They didn’t. To make things worse, though Leahy repeatedly talked about Inspector General reporting overdue on this program, Congress is not going to wait for these reports before they extend the program for another three years, at least. So Whitehouse’s assurances that we can trust minimization to protect US person privacy seems badly misplaced.

In any case, this represents an admission, as strong as any we’ve seen, that this program is entirely about collecting the US person communication of those who communicate with people (DiFi used the term “person of interest,” which I had not heard before) overseas.

Update: Updated to explain this came in a markup hearing. Thanks to Peterr for pointing out my oversight on that point.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

13 Responses to Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz The @NFL is probably only entity in universe w/less credibility than the Patriots ands Brady. Goodell, like Clapper, a proven liar.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The @nfl Pro Bowl is in my hometown, minutes away, so I am at the game! Hahahaha, nope; what kind of idiot goes to that @NFL horseshit?
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @seanpaulkelley Naw, I need all this shit. Could maybe use more.....
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @seanpaulkelley It is not what you own, but who you are Kemosabee.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Officially? And has Bill the Dog the Cat caught and mouses?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @seanpaulkelley I don't even know you!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @seanpaulkelley WTF? You dont have Bringing Up Baby, Pink Panther (orig), Seven Days In May, Casablanca, NxNW, Godfather or Singing in Rain?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @armandos Saw that. Even more than Santos. @AlvaroUribeVel @gnzlrm @pontifex_es
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Atrios Then they'll drive like doodoo bc they've lost their wing mirrors.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lateblum I admit I tend to look positively on living at the far western end of a time zone, having done it in UT and MI.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Woot! Light enough to drive at 5:30. It's practically spring.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @seanpaulkelley Seriously great movie.
2hreplyretweetfavorite