Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

In the Senate Judiciary Committee’s markup of the FISA Amendments Act, Mike Lee, Dick Durbin, and Chris Chris Coons just tried, unsuccessfully, to require the government to get a warrant before it searched US person communications collected via the targeting of non-US person under the FISA Amendments Act. It was, as Dianne Feinstein said, not dissimilar from an amendment Ron Wyden and Mark Udall had tried to pass when FAA was marked up before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The debate revealed new confirmation that the government is wiretapping American citizens in the guise of foreign surveillance.

DiFi argued that the amendment would have impeded the government to pursue Nidal Hassan by delaying the time when they could have reviewed his communication (presumably with Anwar al-Awlaki). Of course, the amendment included an emergency provision that would have permitted such a search after the effect.

More telling, though, was Whitehouse’s response. He referred back to his time using warrants as a US Attorney, and said that requiring a warrant to access the US person communication would “kill this program,” and that to think warrants “fundamentally misapprehends the way in which this program operates.”

Now, I’d be more sympathetic to Whitehouse here if, back when this bill was originally argued, his amendments requiring FISC oversight of minimization after the fact had passed. They didn’t. To make things worse, though Leahy repeatedly talked about Inspector General reporting overdue on this program, Congress is not going to wait for these reports before they extend the program for another three years, at least. So Whitehouse’s assurances that we can trust minimization to protect US person privacy seems badly misplaced.

In any case, this represents an admission, as strong as any we’ve seen, that this program is entirely about collecting the US person communication of those who communicate with people (DiFi used the term “person of interest,” which I had not heard before) overseas.

Update: Updated to explain this came in a markup hearing. Thanks to Peterr for pointing out my oversight on that point.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

13 Responses to Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @siestadrive There was interesting discussion abt doing an IRV poll to make this crapshoot more sensible. I might do that. @SamWangPhD
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @armandodkos: "Pick a drug law you don’t like and thank Sen. Joe Biden". He deserves credit for racially disproportionate impact of drug…
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @armandodkos: Jeralyn discusses Biden's awful record on crime issues // Joe Biden's Plans Have Long Roots http://t.co/6EFOlYUvrq via @Ta
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz They shouldn't. Not to mention that Biden is horrid on law+order/crime reform issues. @Sherry_Reson @downwithtyranny https://t.co/25b4P2XaEA
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JamesWolcott: "Moments from now Republican hopeful Donald Trump will be faxing us directly from Elvis Presley's home in Memphis."
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight Well, theoretically, yes. But courts let this junk in all the time when it supports the government and cops.
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Lewinski is not a doctor, not even a licensed psychologist. Just a cop loving charlatan for sale. https://t.co/bANRY60qA3
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @macfathom: Excellent piece on Bill Lewinski by @mattapuzzo: http://t.co/DnX6CC52oT. For more on Lewinski, see my 2010 story: http://t.c…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why are they even having Koch begfest? Haven't they already declared Walker their guy?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RyanLizza To be able to push back against appearance that all Dems support broad criminal justice reform?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is it me, or does Marist misunderstand how polls are ALWAYS used in Presidential politics? http://t.co/rq0NVTNjW0
2hreplyretweetfavorite