Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

In the Senate Judiciary Committee’s markup of the FISA Amendments Act, Mike Lee, Dick Durbin, and Chris Chris Coons just tried, unsuccessfully, to require the government to get a warrant before it searched US person communications collected via the targeting of non-US person under the FISA Amendments Act. It was, as Dianne Feinstein said, not dissimilar from an amendment Ron Wyden and Mark Udall had tried to pass when FAA was marked up before the Senate Intelligence Committee.

The debate revealed new confirmation that the government is wiretapping American citizens in the guise of foreign surveillance.

DiFi argued that the amendment would have impeded the government to pursue Nidal Hassan by delaying the time when they could have reviewed his communication (presumably with Anwar al-Awlaki). Of course, the amendment included an emergency provision that would have permitted such a search after the effect.

More telling, though, was Whitehouse’s response. He referred back to his time using warrants as a US Attorney, and said that requiring a warrant to access the US person communication would “kill this program,” and that to think warrants “fundamentally misapprehends the way in which this program operates.”

Now, I’d be more sympathetic to Whitehouse here if, back when this bill was originally argued, his amendments requiring FISC oversight of minimization after the fact had passed. They didn’t. To make things worse, though Leahy repeatedly talked about Inspector General reporting overdue on this program, Congress is not going to wait for these reports before they extend the program for another three years, at least. So Whitehouse’s assurances that we can trust minimization to protect US person privacy seems badly misplaced.

In any case, this represents an admission, as strong as any we’ve seen, that this program is entirely about collecting the US person communication of those who communicate with people (DiFi used the term “person of interest,” which I had not heard before) overseas.

Update: Updated to explain this came in a markup hearing. Thanks to Peterr for pointing out my oversight on that point.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

13 Responses to Sheldon Whitehouse Confirms FISA Amendments Act Permits Unwarranted Access to US Person Content

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @Taniel: the full video is here: #LaquanMcDonald falls immediately & no longer moves. And yet he was shot 16 tim…
emptywheel @kgosztola So who did get into presser? Any chance city is giving preferential access to those who've agreed to edit it?
emptywheel RT @muckrakery: Waiting outside as the rest of Chicago establishment media get first access to the video I helped pry loose.
emptywheel RT @kgosztola: Important question: Why didn't any establishment media outlet in Chicago sue city for video of #JasonVanDyke killing #Laquan
emptywheel RT @WSJ: A judge has chided the Obama administration over delays in closing the Guantanamo prison
emptywheel To be clear, I don't think Obama changed OWN rationale for assassination being cool--I think John Yoo's (or whoever's) was just that bad.
emptywheel @LemonSlayerUS Hard to believe it's not. 17 secs isn't lot of time to chase down Russian plane if you're not planning ahead @empiricalerror
emptywheel @LemonSlayerUS THe radar shows a pass through, a circle around, then another pass through. So maybe that circle around was a bombing run?
emptywheel @LemonSlayerUS Was Russia warned not to breach airspace or not to attack Turkmen rebels?
emptywheel Obama Administration Changed the Rationale for Why Assassinations Don’t Violate the Assassination Prohibition
emptywheel Across country, grown men are shriveling at sight of pardoned turkey, hiding behind (lethal) outdoor turkey fryers
emptywheel Some crazy hippies point out buzzards already fly all over America eating your pets and seed corn, met with silence.