Why Would a Whistleblower Go to Eric Cantor?

The NYT reports that in late October, a “whistleblower” approached Eric Cantor to tell him about Petraeus’ affair.

Eric Cantor, the House majority leader, said Saturday an F.B.I. employee whom his staff described as a whistle-blower told him about Mr. Petraeus’s affair and a possible security breach in late October, which was after the investigation had begun.

“I was contacted by an F.B.I. employee concerned that sensitive, classified information may have been compromised and made certain Director Mueller was aware of these serious allegations and the potential risk to our national security,” Mr. Cantor said in a statement.

Mr. Cantor talked to the person after being told by Representative Dave Reichert, Republican of Washington, that a whistle-blower wanted to speak to someone in the Congressional leadership about a national security concern. On Oct. 31, his chief of staff, Steve Stombres, called the F.B.I. to tell them about the call.

“They took the information,” said Doug Heye, Mr. Cantor’s deputy chief of staff, “and gave the standard answer: they were not able to confirm or deny any investigation, but said that all necessary steps were being taken to make sure no confidential information was at risk.” [my emphasis]

Note Cantor describes this person as an “FBI employee,” not an agent (though he may be deliberately vague to hide the person’s identity), so it’s possible this person is more senior. The person went first to Dave Reichert, who–as a Representative from Seattle–has no ties to the FBI offices that conducted the investigation (though he’s a former Sheriff and may have ties to the FBI through law enforcement channels). And then he asked to talk to someone “in Congressional leadership,” rather than, say, the head of the House Judiciary Committee, Lamar Smith, who has jurisdiction over the FBI, or Mike Rogers, himself a former FBI Agent and the head of the House Intelligence Committee.

In other words, this instance of whistleblower was not conducted as it normally would be, through the appropriate committees, but instead went to the guy whose job is primarily political, leading the Republican caucus.

Note the timing, too. Petraeus was interviewed around October 25-26. Given that Cantor’s Chief of Staff called Mueller after that, it appears the FBI person probably contacted Cantor after that interview–or certainly after it got scheduled. One thing’s certain: the interview could not have been a CYA effort after Mueller got the call from Cantor.

But it may be what Dianne Feinstein called a “additional complication” today. And it’s possible James Clapper finally got informed of the investigation into Petraeus–he says, on November 6, election day–because Mueller knew that Cantor had heard of it. That is, by alerting Cantor, this “whistleblower” may have ensured the national security establishment couldn’t protect Petraeus.

One more note about the timing. The interview–and this alert to Cantor–happened after the time the GOP was going full October Surprise mode on Benghazi. There were tensions between CIA and FBI because CIA had not shared video fo the attack with investigators. Again, there’s no reason to believe this is Benghazi related. But there were certainly institutional tensions playing out just as the FBI interviewed the head of the CIA about his mistress’ access of his email.

Update: Apparently Andrea Mitchell says the FBI investigation would have ended had this not been brought to Cantor.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+0Email to someone

142 Responses to Why Would a Whistleblower Go to Eric Cantor?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
  • 84
  • 85
  • 86
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
  • 90
  • 91
  • 92
  • 93
  • 94
  • 95
  • 96
  • 97
  • 98
  • 99
  • 100
  • 101
  • 102
  • 103
  • 104
  • 105
  • 106
  • 107
  • 108
  • 109
  • 110
  • 111
  • 112
  • 113
  • 114
  • 115
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
  • 136
  • 137
  • 138
  • 139
  • 140
  • 141
  • 142
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective @PogoWasRight @walterwkatz @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports And F1 is FAR bigger than that EPL garbage
36mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhilPerspective @PogoWasRight @walterwkatz The what? So @NBC @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports cut off the worlds biggest sporting league for that?
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Bill requires all electronic communications service providers to maintain metadata for 3 years and provide it under new "System."
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel You should all think of Burr's bill as iCALEA under guise of a dragnet extension. it addresses some of issues Comey claims are encryption.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PrivacyQuest As I suggested, lot lot of what Comey cares abt is iMessage, FaceTime data. That's what Burr's bill would get @biasedreporter
49mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @apb44 @F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports Grrrrrrrrr!!!
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @apb44 @F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports I wouldn't know, I can't get any coverage!
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight Yes, but the shitbag @F1onNBCSports livestream just froze up+crapped out. Now just ads. Completely worthless @NBC @NBCSports
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@biasedreporter Part of what he & McConnell are trying to do w/dragnet expansion is to collect data he's really worried abt wrt encryption
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports ...who refuses to competently cover the biggest F1 race of the year. You should rethink your priorities.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hey @F1, you always talk about wanting better US audience, and then you partner w/total shitbag network like @NBC @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight @F1onNBCSports Got it now thanks! Just stunned at incompetence+bad faith by @NBC @NBCSports I'm sure they won't respond either
1hreplyretweetfavorite
November 2012
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930