Jane Harman Now Targeting Individual CyberTargets with Drone Court

Jane Harman’s advocacy for a drone court suffers from the same problem I touched on here (and will lay out at more length in the next day or so): before you can have a Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court, you need some law the court will apply. Harman seems to envision just applying the standards the Executive — not Congress — came up with, which isn’t how Schoolhouse Rock taught me the government is supposed to work.

Congress, in her model, would just be fully apprised of what goes on in the Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court, not write law to limit what can be approved.

But I’m more interested — alarmed, really — by the way Harman seamlessly adds cybertargeting to her advocacy.

The FISA court, renamed the CT Court, could also oversee drones and cyber. A FISA court application must show that specific individuals are connected to a foreign power – which is defined, in part, as a group engaged in international terrorism. Drone and cyber applications could (1) list the individual/cyber target against whom the lethal operation is directed and (2) submit a finding of probable cause that the individual/cyber target is connected to a foreign power, is in a senior operational capacity and poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States.

Approved applications for drone strikes and cyberattacks would need to be renewed after a certain period, and discontinued if evidence is presented that the targets no longer meet the criteria. [my emphasis]

Granted, it would have been nice if the government had had to go to a court to explain why a publisher like WikiLeaks should be targeted with a persistent DNS attack, assuming that’s what happened. But given that both our FISA targeting and our targeting killing targeting probably allow for far too much abuse of the First Amendment, I’m not convinced the FISA Court would have noted the problem with that incident of prior restraint.

More generally, though, isn’t Harman’s neat inclusion of cyber targeting here a hint that our cyberattacks have gone beyond just Iran and WikiLeaks?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

15 Responses to Jane Harman Now Targeting Individual CyberTargets with Drone Court

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel TIL: Reporter who FOLLOWED Matt DeHart's parents back into US got detained, searched. http://t.co/86VH3lOIcB
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MotherJones: Exclusive: The CIA is shuttering a secretive climate research program http://t.co/ArFX31TxNY http://t.co/7TMaFvxTUq
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Not excusing Hillary's email practices, but seeing A LOT of GOPers criticize practices top Republicans have used too. #MirrorMirrorOnTheWall
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Aside fr CNN's error abt notice on 215 in 2011, this is interesting interview w/Reggie Walton. http://t.co/OuM9dBmoOU
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Really love focus on Feebs saying in 2009 215 has never cracked a case. Strongly suspect they have since but won't tell us abt it.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tomtomorrow Happens to me too. I've been forced to send all wine deliveries to local @FedEx.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @SunSportsFOXFL This is so exciting! But you need to follow so I can DM. Attention: @SunSportsRays @RaysBaseball
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tomtomorrow You seem to have persistent delivery challenges. Maybe you should move to a MailBoxes Etc? @Fedex
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @the_intercept: Apple and Google Just Attended a Confidential Spy Summit at a Remote English Mansion. http://t.co/nGiobsI5MH http://t.c…
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel As focus switches to OTHER expiring PATRIOT authorities, remember redefined "roving wiretap" in 2007. https://t.co/1JSMrrnGSt
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Wondering how many weekends of his life @joshgerstein has lost to Friday Clinton document dumps? https://t.co/fqeZYaz6rI
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @DJNotWittingly Precisely. And they can submit one order w/200 different IP addresses, so it won't show up as a big number on reporting.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728