Jane Harman Now Targeting Individual CyberTargets with Drone Court

Jane Harman’s advocacy for a drone court suffers from the same problem I touched on here (and will lay out at more length in the next day or so): before you can have a Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court, you need some law the court will apply. Harman seems to envision just applying the standards the Executive — not Congress — came up with, which isn’t how Schoolhouse Rock taught me the government is supposed to work.

Congress, in her model, would just be fully apprised of what goes on in the Drone and/or Targeted Killing Court, not write law to limit what can be approved.

But I’m more interested — alarmed, really — by the way Harman seamlessly adds cybertargeting to her advocacy.

The FISA court, renamed the CT Court, could also oversee drones and cyber. A FISA court application must show that specific individuals are connected to a foreign power – which is defined, in part, as a group engaged in international terrorism. Drone and cyber applications could (1) list the individual/cyber target against whom the lethal operation is directed and (2) submit a finding of probable cause that the individual/cyber target is connected to a foreign power, is in a senior operational capacity and poses an imminent threat of violent attack against the United States.

Approved applications for drone strikes and cyberattacks would need to be renewed after a certain period, and discontinued if evidence is presented that the targets no longer meet the criteria. [my emphasis]

Granted, it would have been nice if the government had had to go to a court to explain why a publisher like WikiLeaks should be targeted with a persistent DNS attack, assuming that’s what happened. But given that both our FISA targeting and our targeting killing targeting probably allow for far too much abuse of the First Amendment, I’m not convinced the FISA Court would have noted the problem with that incident of prior restraint.

More generally, though, isn’t Harman’s neat inclusion of cyber targeting here a hint that our cyberattacks have gone beyond just Iran and WikiLeaks?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

15 Responses to Jane Harman Now Targeting Individual CyberTargets with Drone Court

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @DaveRushton3 I'm just trying to get ahead of the conspiracy mongering. It's a good one, don't you think?
55sreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV When will this long dark Ebowla nightmare end?
56sreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV CNN right now: Uber, but for bowling Ebola patients.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Walking with a forged note is like walking w/an illegal gun. But driving trucks of them across a series of tubes? That's Just War.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Yes, I'm making that one up, folks. Or maybe getting ahead of the conspiracy rush. You never know.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ddayen Fact check! Banks didn't have to actually walk anywhere.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel New Ted Cruz conspiracy theory? Obama invented Ebola crisis as distraction so he could sneak Russian terrorist into country to give trial to
7mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @GottliebShow: Nailed it RT @goodfellaz23: White Goodman http://t.co/n98KqwLODS
12mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @nakashimae: @adampgoldman Russian man held at Bagram to be prosecuted in U.S. -1st forn fighter in afghan to be moved for trial http://…
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Atrios Gonna spend all day after election day in my PJs w/some kind of breakfast drink nuking all the spam accounts pursuing me.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In a just world, folks would realize that Mike Rogers and Peter King didn't just start talking shite THIS WEEK. They've been at it a while.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jan   Mar »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
2425262728