Administration’s OWN White Paper Backs Claim Mike Rogers Did Not Share Dragnet Notice

I already made this point when I was the first person to point out that the House Intelligence Committee apparently did not share the 2011 notice provided by DOJ with members outside of the House Intelligence Committee.

But no one besides me appears to have noticed it. Here’s what the Section 215 dragnet White Paper says happened to the 2009 notice provided to Silvestre Reyes and Dianne Feinstein.

In December 2009, DOJ worked with the Intelligence Community to provide a classified briefing paper to the House and Senate Intelligence Committees that could be made available to all Members of Congress regarding the telephony metadata collection program. A letter accompanying the briefing paper sent to the House Intelligence Committee specifically stated that “it is important that all Members of Congress have access to information about this program” and that “making this document available to all members of Congress is an effective way to inform the legislative debate about reauthorization of Section 215.” See Letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich to the Honorable Silvestre Reyes, Chairman, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Dec. 14, 2009). Both Intelligence Committees made this document available to all Members of Congress prior to the February 2010 reauthorization of Section 215. See Letter from Sen. Diane Feinstein and Sen. Christopher S. Bond to Colleagues (Feb. 23, 2010); Letter from Rep. Silvestre Reyes to Colleagues (Feb. 24, 2010); [my emphasis]

Here’s what it says happened to the 2011 notice provided to Mike Rogers and Dianne Feinstein.

An updated version of the briefing paper, also recently released in redacted form to the public, was provided to the Senate and House Intelligence Committees again in February 2011 in connection with the reauthorization that occurred later that year. See Letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich to the Honorable Dianne Feinstein and the Honorable Saxby Chambliss, Chairman and Vice Chairman, Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (Feb. 2, 2011); Letter from Assistant Attorney General Ronald Weich to the Honorable Mike Rogers and the Honorable C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Feb. 2, 2011). The Senate Intelligence Committee made this updated paper available to all Senators later that month. See Letter from Sen. Diane Feinstein and Sen. Saxby Chambliss to Colleagues (Feb. 8, 2011). [my emphasis]

See that word “both” when describing what the intelligence committees did in 2009? See the description of the “Senate Intelligence Committee” followed by a period in describing what the intelligence committees did in 2011, with no mention of “both” or the House Intelligence Committee whatsoever?

The White Paper is as clear as any document spewing disingenuous claims can be (there are several even in these two passages). In 2009, both intelligence committees sent a letter to their respective colleagues letting them know the notice was available. In 2011, just the Senate Intelligence Committee did.

That means at 65 of the people who voted to reauthorize the PATRIOT Act in 2011 had no way of knowing they were reauthorizing the ongoing creation of a database of the phone-based relationships of every American. At least in theory, those 65 members were more than enough to make a difference in the vote.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+3Email to someone

9 Responses to Administration’s OWN White Paper Backs Claim Mike Rogers Did Not Share Dragnet Notice

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @ddayen Mens rea is actually a good overall reform. Ask any criminal defense atty.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Silly Duncan. Mark Penn is never free. He always comes at a steep price. https://t.co/dOLXawyLDG
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @tomwatson Bill is going rogue asshole again, Mark Penn is still in picture and FBI drops confirm of investigation. Yep all just dandy!
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @adschina Planning on an Audible version?
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BuglegsMcWalshy It does seem to be deja vu all over again
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @adamgoldmanwp: Umm sayyaf just got charged with material support. https://t.co/E5oeQSX11K
29mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @brahmresnik @_DianeDouglas @kelliwardaz @SenJohnMcCain Sure. Two crazy peas in a pod.
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel One stop shopping for NSA's 702 collection. https://t.co/PGTeE6vEhg
32mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And now all the dutiful Clinton Team are scrambling to fend off reports of how their campaign is flailing wildly https://t.co/fQcfHp7fCj
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Thanks to @carminemac for reminding me Bernie raised Pharma's role in opioid crisis in Jan https://t.co/cZkjKmTL6b https://t.co/nGESov3Ue7
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @pareene According to this piece, lot of Flint residents think Clinton's Flint visit a harmful political stunt https://t.co/4WBUxfFbg7
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JonathanCohn @billmon1 Key issue, IMO, is whether it makes it harder to get funding to dig pipe. https://t.co/ZhXTT7f9GF
1hreplyretweetfavorite