Military Rule of Evidence 505

On the Manning Art. 32, Court Secrecy & Nat. Sec. Cases

I somehow stumbled into an article for The Nation by Rainey Reitman entitled Access Blocked to Bradley Manning’s Hearing. To make a long story short, in a Twitter exchange today with Ms. Reitman and Kevin Gosztola of Firedoglake (who has done yeoman’s work covering the Manning hearing), I questioned some of the statements and inferences made in Ms. Reitman’s report. She challenged me to write on the subject, so here I am.

First, Ms. Reitman glibly offered to let me use her work as “foundation” to work off of. Quite frankly, not only was my point not originally to particularly go further; my point, in fact, was that her foundation was deeply and materially flawed.

Reitman starts off with this statement:

The WikiLeaks saga is centered on issues of government transparency and accountability, but the public is being strategically denied access to the Manning hearing, one of the most important court cases in our lifetime.

While the “WikiLeaks saga” is indeed centered on transparency and accountability for many of us, that simply is not the case in regard to the US Military prosecution of Pvt. Bradley Manning. The second you make that statement about the UCMJ criminal prosecution of Manning, you have stepped off the tracks of reality and credibility in court reportage and analysis. The scope of Manning’s Article 32 hearing was/is were the crimes detailed in the charging document committed and is there reason to believe Manning committed them. Additionally, in an Article 32 hearing, distinct from a civilian preliminary hearing, there is limited opportunity for personal mitigating information to be adduced in order to argue for the Investigating Officer to recommend non-judicial punishment as opposed to court martial trial. That is it. There is no concern or consideration of “transparency and accountability”, within the ambit suggested by Ms. Reitman, in the least.

Calling the Manning Article 32 hearing “one of the most important court cases in our lifetime” is far beyond hyperbole. First off, it is, for all the breathless hype, a relatively straight forward probable cause determination legally and, to the particular military court jurisdiction it is proceeding under, it is nothing more than that. The burden of proof is light, and the issues narrow and confined to that which is described above. The grand hopes, dreams and principles of the Manning and WikiLeaks acolytes simply do not fit into this equation no matter how much they may want them to. Frankly, it would be a great thing to get those issues aired in this country; but this military UCMJ proceeding is not, and will not be, the forum where that happens.

Moving on, Reitman raises the specter of “the death penalty” for Manning. While the death penalty remains a technical possibility under one of the charges, the prosecution has repeatedly stated it will not be sought and, after all the statements on the record in that regard, there is simply no reason to embellish otherwise. Reitman next states:

This case will show much about the United States’s tolerance for whistleblowers who show the country in an unflattering light.

No, it most certainly will not. In fact, the Manning criminal military prosecution has nothing whatsoever to do with “whistleblowers”. Despite the loose and wild eyed use of the term “whistleblower” in popular culture, not to mention by supporters of Bradley Manning, the concept Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JPughMI I'm so old I remember when Abdullah was Barry Sanders.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @digby56 She thinks she's a libertarian.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @digby56 Look. The RNC gave her that loot fairly. No reason she should be taxed on loot!
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @rcooley123: The Iran Nuclear Deal: Give Diplomacy a Chance - http://t.co/BPPjjJPdpv |
59mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV Cause Reagan never got political credit for Beirut and so didn't keep trying to resuscitate his reputation.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @realDonaldTrump @SarahPalinUSA Sorry. I'd rather give a constipated pig an enema.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV George W. Bush returning to New Orleans on Katrina anniversary is so stupid. Why didn't Reagan return to Beirut?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @onekade It made me sad. Stupid catwalk in indoor dome prevented what could have been the best catch evah...
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @cherylrofer: @ISISNuclear What makes you think the AP document is accurate?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Cy Vance did pull his name fr RentBoy bust. http://t.co/VFNIl8dS4c Otherwise I'd suggest it relates to his Times Square Boobies
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @44amazingrace @gandalfstaff @CNN Well, @cnni is still a LOT better that domestic CNN. But yeah...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @csoghoian: The US droned a guy who wrote a RAT & hacked Facebook accounts for ISIS. We live in the future http://t.co/n3gmCRqqof http:/…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031