Military Rule of Evidence 505

On the Manning Art. 32, Court Secrecy & Nat. Sec. Cases

I somehow stumbled into an article for The Nation by Rainey Reitman entitled Access Blocked to Bradley Manning’s Hearing. To make a long story short, in a Twitter exchange today with Ms. Reitman and Kevin Gosztola of Firedoglake (who has done yeoman’s work covering the Manning hearing), I questioned some of the statements and inferences made in Ms. Reitman’s report. She challenged me to write on the subject, so here I am.

First, Ms. Reitman glibly offered to let me use her work as “foundation” to work off of. Quite frankly, not only was my point not originally to particularly go further; my point, in fact, was that her foundation was deeply and materially flawed.

Reitman starts off with this statement:

The WikiLeaks saga is centered on issues of government transparency and accountability, but the public is being strategically denied access to the Manning hearing, one of the most important court cases in our lifetime.

While the “WikiLeaks saga” is indeed centered on transparency and accountability for many of us, that simply is not the case in regard to the US Military prosecution of Pvt. Bradley Manning. The second you make that statement about the UCMJ criminal prosecution of Manning, you have stepped off the tracks of reality and credibility in court reportage and analysis. The scope of Manning’s Article 32 hearing was/is were the crimes detailed in the charging document committed and is there reason to believe Manning committed them. Additionally, in an Article 32 hearing, distinct from a civilian preliminary hearing, there is limited opportunity for personal mitigating information to be adduced in order to argue for the Investigating Officer to recommend non-judicial punishment as opposed to court martial trial. That is it. There is no concern or consideration of “transparency and accountability”, within the ambit suggested by Ms. Reitman, in the least.

Calling the Manning Article 32 hearing “one of the most important court cases in our lifetime” is far beyond hyperbole. First off, it is, for all the breathless hype, a relatively straight forward probable cause determination legally and, to the particular military court jurisdiction it is proceeding under, it is nothing more than that. The burden of proof is light, and the issues narrow and confined to that which is described above. The grand hopes, dreams and principles of the Manning and WikiLeaks acolytes simply do not fit into this equation no matter how much they may want them to. Frankly, it would be a great thing to get those issues aired in this country; but this military UCMJ proceeding is not, and will not be, the forum where that happens.

Moving on, Reitman raises the specter of “the death penalty” for Manning. While the death penalty remains a technical possibility under one of the charges, the prosecution has repeatedly stated it will not be sought and, after all the statements on the record in that regard, there is simply no reason to embellish otherwise. Reitman next states:

This case will show much about the United States’s tolerance for whistleblowers who show the country in an unflattering light.

No, it most certainly will not. In fact, the Manning criminal military prosecution has nothing whatsoever to do with “whistleblowers”. Despite the loose and wild eyed use of the term “whistleblower” in popular culture, not to mention by supporters of Bradley Manning, the concept Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV It may be Talk Like a Pirate Day for the rest of us, but for the privateers on Wall Street, every day is Act Like a Pirate Day.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @imraansiddiqi: Bill Montgomery's Anti-Muslim Seminar Results in Threats to Muslims, Phoenix PD Will Not Participate http://t.co/zEabqCI
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @NickKristof: Interesting RT @CoryBooker: Revoke NFL Nonprofit Status Give Funds to #DomesticAbuse Prevention http://t.co/qLhWsMvSp2
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Mansfield2016: Despite having 6 years of Senate majority, Obama's failure rate for judicial noms still higher than GWB & Reagan. http:/…
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jazgar @JoshuaHol Also blames the woman and her husband. Bundy is a truly horrible human being.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @LukeRussert @pareene I am #satisfied you are a blithering idiot Little Boy Luke.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @lrozen: The plenary has begun, State dept says #irantalks
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Don't white whale! It leads to blind spots. Whale is being hidden by school of fish @onekade @jilliancyork @JameelJaffer @cia
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack @radleybalko Bullshit, the original surveillance NOT just Posse Commitatus violation, but 4th too.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @mlcalderone: Bush admin tried linking Saddam to Al Qaeda in rush to war. Now Obama admin pushing ISIS/AQ link to justify its war: http:…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Funding Hapless Mission to Train Syrian Rebels Increases Value of Saudi Terror Hedge Fund http://t.co/gSZFuS48Q9
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq They wouldn't let me pre-order at the price yet.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2014
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930