Siemens

Lanny Breuer Admits That Economists Have Convinced Him Not to Indict Corporations

I’ve become increasingly convinced that DOJ’s head of Criminal Division, Lanny Breuer is the rotting cancer at the heart of a thoroughly discredited DOJ. Which is why I’m not surprised to see this speech he gave at the NYC Bar Association selling the “benefits” of Deferred Prosecution Agreements.  (h/t Main Justice) He spends a lot of his speech claiming DPAs result in accountability.

And, over the last decade, DPAs have become a mainstay of white collar criminal law enforcement.

The result has been, unequivocally, far greater accountability for corporate wrongdoing – and a sea change in corporate compliance efforts. Companies now know that avoiding the disaster scenario of an indictment does not mean an escape from accountability. They know that they will be answerable even for conduct that in years past would have resulted in a declination. Companies also realize that if they want to avoid pleading guilty, or to convince us to forego bringing a case altogether, they must prove to us that they are serious about compliance. Our prosecutors are sophisticated. They know the difference between a real compliance program and a make-believe one. They know the difference between actual cooperation with a government investigation and make-believe cooperation. And they know the difference between a rogue employee and a rotten corporation.

[snip]

One of the reasons why deferred prosecution agreements are such a powerful tool is that, in many ways, a DPA has the same punitive, deterrent, and rehabilitative effect as a guilty plea:  when a company enters into a DPA with the government, or an NPA for that matter, it almost always must acknowledge wrongdoing, agree to cooperate with the government’s investigation, pay a fine, agree to improve its compliance program, and agree to face prosecution if it fails to satisfy the terms of the agreement.  All of these components of DPAs are critical for accountability.

But the real tell is when he confesses that he “sometimes–though … not always” let corporations off because a CEO or an economist scared him with threats of global markets failing if he held a corporation accountable by indicting it.

To be clear, the decision of whether to indict a corporation, defer prosecution, or decline altogether is not one that I, or anyone in the Criminal Division, take lightly.  We are frequently on the receiving end of presentations from defense counsel, CEOs, and economists who argue that the collateral consequences of an indictment would be devastating for their client.  In my conference room, over the years, I have heard sober predictions that a company or bank might fail if we indict, that innocent employees could lose their jobs, that entire industries may be affected, and even that global markets will feel the effectsSometimes – though, let me stress, not always – these presentations are compelling. [my emphasis]

None of this is surprising, of course. It has long been clear that Breuer’s Criminal Division often bows to the scare tactics of Breuer’s once and future client base. (In his speech, he boasts about how well DPAs and NPAs have worked with Morgan Stanley and Barclays, respectively.)

It’s just so embarrassing that he went out in public and made this pathetic attempt to claim it all amounts to accountability.

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @TyreJim On this subject yes. Also support Trump's positions on single payer free healthcare and immigration amnesty. Okay that's Old Trump.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV or like @JasonLeopold doing burnouts in a giant pickup truck....
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV Dude totally looked like you!
15mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @bmaz Hey, I don't have an SUV!
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IanPGunn ...on my office TV while working. The only guy saw that got it right ahead of time about backflooding on levees was @chadmyerscnn
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IanPGunn I'm in AZ, so was kind of removed. But was fascinated by Katrina before+after impact. So, watched a LOT of coverage at home and...
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso @JimWhiteGNV Man, but for your RT, wouldn't have seen video, which is WAY more awesome than the GIF. https://t.co/gubkbbhZd0
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @theurbansherpa So you schedule holiday next year this time to look into the How-Old app to see if it's time for heating pad? @BreeBartonYA
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BreeBartonYA Sounds awesome. You don't get the heating pad til next year, remember? When you turn 60?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BobbyChesney So yeah, that all makes the non-mooting ruling more interesting. @charlie_savage
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BobbyChesney Have suspicion they actually ARE collecting VZ wireless bulk now. & govt wants to keep data until Feb @charlie_savage
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @BreeBartonYA You can have my heating pad. I've discovered yoga works better.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jul    
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031