Picking and Choosing Which Journalistic Outlets to Treat as Journalistic Outlets

Tuesday, Philip Shenon reported that Wikileaks wanted the Defense Department’s help reviewing the next batch of documents it will release for names that should be redacted.

Julian Assange wants the Pentagon’s help.

His secretive WikiLeaks website tells The Daily Beast it is making an urgent request to the Defense Department for help reviewing 15,000 still-secret American military reports to remove the names of Afghan civilians and others who might be endangered when the website makes the reports public.

[snip]In a phone interview Tuesday with The Daily Beast, Schmitt said the site wanted to open a line of communication with the Defense Department in order to review an additional 15,000 classified reports in an effort to “make redactions so they can be safely published.” Schmitt said that these reports also relate to American military operations in Afghanistan.

It was a good play from Wikileaks, as it would place Wikileaks in the same position as newspapers like NYT and WaPo which occasionally spike information the government says is particularly sensitive. However, the government chose to pretend it doesn’t have this kind of conversation all the time, and also to pretend that it doesn’t regularly do FOIA reviews for this kind of information.

Instead, DOD spokesperson Geoff Morrell, doing his best Agent Smith imitation, “demand[ed]” that Wikilieaks return all the documents it has received, repeating “do the right thing” over and over.

Of course, no other journalistic outlet would do what Morrell called “doing the right thing.” (To the credit of some of the journalists covering Morrell’s Agent Smith show, they seem somewhat dubious of the claims logic.)

Meanwhile, DOD has also revoked Michael Hastings’ permission embed in Afghanistan, claiming the unit in question does not trust Hastings (though the move appears to be retaliation for Hastings’ refusal to cooperate in a DOD IG probe of Hastings’ article).

The government is not supposed to license favored press in this country. But what DOD is doing is choosing only to play ball with those outlets with which it is chummy enough to largely influence the coverage of.

Which I suppose makes it different than a license. It’s like a membership in a secret tree house that you’ve got to know the secret password to belong to.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Picking and Choosing Which Journalistic Outlets to Treat as Journalistic Outlets

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JasonLeopold @emptywheel @laRosalind @JimWhiteGNV I have a sense that this may be Jasons vinyl Jubilee!
JimWhiteGNV @deray And it's guaranteed the kids would find some of them!
JimWhiteGNV RT @deray: When I hear people advocate for teachers to be armed in classrooms, I always wonder where they think the guns are going to be st…
JimWhiteGNV @laRosalind Good point. But for now they've moved on.
emptywheel RT @MazMHussain: Saudi government's thoughtful response to global outcry over plans to behead and crucify Ali al-Nimr: https://t.co/b4XGnyI
JimWhiteGNV @laRosalind @JasonLeopold @emptywheel @bmaz Seconded! Enjoy your day, Jason!
JimWhiteGNV I had planned to work on the garage today, but it's very important to properly break in recliner part of new sofa. http://t.co/hc0SO1Y8Hs
JimWhiteGNV Renovation update: new sofa and loveseat arrived! http://t.co/Zm1DmHf0a6
bmaz @ScottGreenfield @wolmanj @Popehat FWIW, I am fine w/this OTHER than the video. That just never looks good in hindsight. Never. #AudioOnly
bmaz @ScottGreenfield @wolmanj @Popehat And, I am betting, just one JA instead of two and a bailiff.
bmaz @ScottGreenfield @wolmanj @Popehat No, Jay is right. the judge and parties are, as far as I know, in the actual courtroom. Just no reporter
August 2010
« Jul   Sep »