Picking and Choosing Which Journalistic Outlets to Treat as Journalistic Outlets

Tuesday, Philip Shenon reported that Wikileaks wanted the Defense Department’s help reviewing the next batch of documents it will release for names that should be redacted.

Julian Assange wants the Pentagon’s help.

His secretive WikiLeaks website tells The Daily Beast it is making an urgent request to the Defense Department for help reviewing 15,000 still-secret American military reports to remove the names of Afghan civilians and others who might be endangered when the website makes the reports public.

[snip]In a phone interview Tuesday with The Daily Beast, Schmitt said the site wanted to open a line of communication with the Defense Department in order to review an additional 15,000 classified reports in an effort to “make redactions so they can be safely published.” Schmitt said that these reports also relate to American military operations in Afghanistan.

It was a good play from Wikileaks, as it would place Wikileaks in the same position as newspapers like NYT and WaPo which occasionally spike information the government says is particularly sensitive. However, the government chose to pretend it doesn’t have this kind of conversation all the time, and also to pretend that it doesn’t regularly do FOIA reviews for this kind of information.

Instead, DOD spokesperson Geoff Morrell, doing his best Agent Smith imitation, “demand[ed]” that Wikilieaks return all the documents it has received, repeating “do the right thing” over and over.

Of course, no other journalistic outlet would do what Morrell called “doing the right thing.” (To the credit of some of the journalists covering Morrell’s Agent Smith show, they seem somewhat dubious of the claims logic.)

Meanwhile, DOD has also revoked Michael Hastings’ permission embed in Afghanistan, claiming the unit in question does not trust Hastings (though the move appears to be retaliation for Hastings’ refusal to cooperate in a DOD IG probe of Hastings’ article).

The government is not supposed to license favored press in this country. But what DOD is doing is choosing only to play ball with those outlets with which it is chummy enough to largely influence the coverage of.

Which I suppose makes it different than a license. It’s like a membership in a secret tree house that you’ve got to know the secret password to belong to.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Picking and Choosing Which Journalistic Outlets to Treat as Journalistic Outlets

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @cocktailhag: Well, he may not be President, but Bibi is white, you know. https://t.co/XjuUA5QdRj
emptywheel @nlanc Once. But admittedly I can always do it again. @draperha
bmaz .@McCannSportsLaw Under the circumstances, not really the "good faith" Berman noted as to NFL efforts.
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: How the US Periodically Reveals the Locations of Special Operations Missions https://t.co/bMrlWcmHCK via @vicenews
emptywheel @draperha Oh, tomatoes never last long enough to get freezer burned. Just the livers. And some rolls. @jfeckstein
emptywheel @draperha It's the 2nd year of #2 that has caused all this disorder, I claim! My system didn't hold up to 2nd year of tomatoes @jfeckstein
emptywheel @draperha Which freezer? @jfeckstein
emptywheel @jack_straw21 Hmm. Will try it. Thanks.
emptywheel @draperha Half my seemingly endless supply are freezer burned. Half aren't.
JimWhiteGNV RT @RichOnSports: 2 of the best CF in the game on one field tonight at Camden Yards. Adam Jones the reigning Gold Glove. @KKiermaier39 shou…
emptywheel .@draperha In other news, if anyone has great recipes for a seemingly endless supply of frozen chicken livers...
August 2010
« Jul   Sep »