https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.png00emptywheelhttps://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Logo-Web.pngemptywheel2007-05-20 10:40:002007-05-20 10:40:00David Sanger in the Aspen Grove
Phil Lovering says:
Scott Ritter has IRAN running a couple hundred centrifuges.
Huge ballbearing problems.
Nan says:
Since you referenced Libby, I thought I might ask aloud if anyone has seen a rebuttal to Brian Carney’s Commentary Online article on the meaning of the Libby trial?
Dear EW, I,m sorry this is off topic but, have you seen the article on the Daily Kos by Pinche Tejano titled †Bush declares control of 3 gov branches if any crisis? Last Update†? Or is this old hat I missed along the way?
Jeff says:
I’m not fully thinking through all the implications of this, so it may be obvious, but do you think the only reason Sanger would have gotten by without having to provide testimony – if he indeed did – was because Cathie Martin was in the room with Libby and her testimony supported Libby’s version of the July 2 interview?
MayBee says:
Jeff- Maybe I’m not understanding your question, but David Sanger did testify, during the defense case.
Jeff says:
In the context of the investigation – before the grand jury or in a deposition.
MayBee says:
In the context of the investigation – before the grand jury or in a deposition.
Oh, I see. It’s hard to know if he was brought in during the investigation or not. Both sides seemed to know what he was going to say during testimony, so he talke to someone at some point. It seems like he should have been asked questions before the Grand Jury or in a deposition, but several journalists whose names came up weren’t (Gregory, Dickerson. Although we don’t know for certain about Gregory….). On the other hand, Pincus and Woodward talked to Fitzgerald but weren’t called by him. It’ hard to know….
Anonymous says:
Don’t forget, in terms of NYT propaganda-catapulting, Michael Slackman. A lot of wretched crap has come from that pen.
Scott Ritter has IRAN running a couple hundred centrifuges.
Huge ballbearing problems.
Since you referenced Libby, I thought I might ask aloud if anyone has seen a rebuttal to Brian Carney’s Commentary Online article on the meaning of the Libby trial?
Carney May 07 article on Libby trial
Thanks.
Dear EW, I,m sorry this is off topic but, have you seen the article on the Daily Kos by Pinche Tejano titled †Bush declares control of 3 gov branches if any crisis? Last Update†? Or is this old hat I missed along the way?
I’m not fully thinking through all the implications of this, so it may be obvious, but do you think the only reason Sanger would have gotten by without having to provide testimony – if he indeed did – was because Cathie Martin was in the room with Libby and her testimony supported Libby’s version of the July 2 interview?
Jeff- Maybe I’m not understanding your question, but David Sanger did testify, during the defense case.
In the context of the investigation – before the grand jury or in a deposition.
In the context of the investigation – before the grand jury or in a deposition.
Oh, I see. It’s hard to know if he was brought in during the investigation or not. Both sides seemed to know what he was going to say during testimony, so he talke to someone at some point. It seems like he should have been asked questions before the Grand Jury or in a deposition, but several journalists whose names came up weren’t (Gregory, Dickerson. Although we don’t know for certain about Gregory….). On the other hand, Pincus and Woodward talked to Fitzgerald but weren’t called by him. It’ hard to know….
Don’t forget, in terms of NYT propaganda-catapulting, Michael Slackman. A lot of wretched crap has come from that pen.