CIA & Foggo: It’s Hard On Spy Pimps Out There

It’s getting hard out there on the pimps and cons in the CIA, first Director Goss goes down the tubes, and now his right hand man Foggo is headed to the slammer.

As reported Monday, Dusty Foggo has copped an incredibly lenient plea to one count of simple wire fraud. Foggo, formerly Number Three man in the Bush CIA, under Director Porter Goss who also resigned in disgrace, had been charged with 28 counts of sordid and sundry fraud, conflict of interest, bribery aiding and abetting, and false statements, all primarily related to the Duke Cunningham and Brent Wilkes criminal convictions.

Just how did Foggo get such a sweetheart deal?

It must have been the evidence that Foggo created a new deputy director of administration position and hired his mistress to fill it, the weekly poker games at Washington hotels with Congressmen such "Duke" Cunningham, lobbyists, House intelligence committee staff members and prostitutes. Or maybe Foggo’s assistance to childhood friend, Brent Wilkes, one of two defense contractors bribing House intelligence committee member Cunningham with tens of thousands of dollars in antiques, travel, fancy meals, house payments, and hookers in exchange for earmarks steering more than $100 million worth of government contracts to Wilkes’ San Diego-based firm, right?

As the always excellent Laura Rozen details in an article just out in Mother Jones:

No, what truly worried Agency brass were the darker secrets their former top logistics officer was threatening to spill had his case gone to trial as scheduled on November 3. They included the massive contracts Foggo was discussing with Wilkes, estimated by one source at over $300 million dollars. "Wilkes was working on several other huge deals when the hammer fell," a source familiar with Foggo’s discussions with Wilkes told me. What kinds of deals? According to the source, they included creating and running a secret plane network

The "classified air support contract" and its implied purposes for renditions are among the truly damaging national security secrets, along with the methods the CIA uses to create front companies and dole out black contracts, that the CIA and Bush White House would have been anxious not to have exposed, especially in a trial set to take place the day before the election in a suburban DC courtroom within a ten-minute drive of the entire national security press corps. (Emphasis added)

Now, most people covering the Foggo case, including Laura, attribute Foggo’s wildly successful plea deal to a strong "graymail defense", especially in light of the fact that Foggo threatened "to expose the cover of virtually every CIA employee with whom he interacted and to divulge to the world some of our country’s most sensitive programs—even though this information has absolutely nothing to do with the charges he faces".

But it’s not graymail behind Foggo’s plea, it is CYA. A true graymail defense is where:

The defendent claims that classified records are necessary to the defense. The goal of the defense team is to request so many classified documents that the federal government says "no." At that point, the defense tries to convince a judge that they cannot get a fair trial without these records; the goal is to have the case or charges dismissed.

Congress enacted the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA) to permit defendants to deal with secret information germane to their trial in sealed court hearings; so anything germane to Foggo’s case could have been handled thusly. And the rest, such as Foggo’s brazen and scurrilous threat to reveal every fellow CIA agent and contact he knew, and all the programs, well that is the epitome of extortion via threat of treason; simply make a record of the threat and throw his rear in solitary. If he makes one single overt act on the threat, prosecute him for treason outright, which is punishable by death.

There were tried and true ways to legally deal with Foggo and his treasonous threats. No, it was that Cheney, Bush, Mukasey and the other grifters, pimps and lackeys they populated our government and intelligence service with didn’t want the public reminded of their secret torture airlines, corruption, dishonesty and perfidy right before the election. Gee, who could have predicted that? Must be hard on those pimps out there these days.

image_print
  1. Evolute says:

    …and throw his rear in solitary. If he makes one single overt act on the threat, prosecute him for treason outright, which is punishable by death.

    And you do what for the ACLU?

    wow! you just made my day.

  2. al75 says:

    Foggo’s ugly history goes all the way back, to reportedly setting up girls for visiting right-wingers in Honduras during the Contra war in the 80’s

    With his High school buddy Wilkes, he set up a mini-whorehouse in the Watergate

    Foggo is closely tied to Brent Wilkes, the San Diego defense contractor who is alleged to have bribed Cunningham and provided him with prostitutes. Foggo has admitted he was at some of Wilkes’s now-infamous parties at Washington hotels—though he denies any knowledge of the prostitutes—and the CIA and law enforcement authorities are carefully examining his relationship with the defense contractor. Newsweek has reported that Foggo, Cunningham, and Bassett/“Nine Fingers” attended a Wilkes poker party at the Westin Grand Hotel

    No, no improper conduct.

    Foggo may have attended widely reported poker parties that Wilkes threw in a hospitality suite in Washington, “but there was no hanky panky” at these events, he said.

    Foggo got the job when W. appointed Porter Goss, a right-wing hatchetman, to replace Tenet at the CIA. Goss came in with a pledge to “reform” the agency. Yeah, reform:

    Foggo was long considered a pseudo-political appointee by former CIA Director Porter J. Goss, a man who had served with the agency for 25 years in far-flung outposts in Honduras, Austria and Germany and had prided himself in his new role as the watchdog over media leaks by CIA officials. (When told of a book about an agency analyst’s work on a book about the Osama bin Laden case, he is accused of telling the ex-official, Gary Berntsen, that he would “redact the [expletive] out of your book so no one will want to read it.”)

    Wilkes and Foggo found their way around DC

    THE CUNNINGHAM SCANDAL
    Contractor ‘knew how to grease the wheels’

    ADCS founder spent years cultivating political contacts

    By Dean Calbreath
    and Jerry Kammer
    STAFF WRITER / COPLEY NEWS SERVICE

    December 4, 2005

    In government documents, he is referred to as “co-conspirator No. 1″: a man who gave more than $630,000 in cash and favors to former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham for help in landing millions of dollars in federal contracts.

    Howard Lipin / Union-Tribune
    ADCS has received at least $80 million in government contracts since 1996. Its $11 million headquarters is located in Poway.
    Poway military contractor Brent Wilkes – whom Justice Department officials identify as the co-conspirator – has long been active in local political circles, serving as the San Diego County finance co-chairman of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s campaign and the state finance co-chairman for President Bush.

    Wilkes has not been charged with a crime in the Cunningham case. The former Rancho Santa Fe congressman announced his resignation Monday after pleading guilty to charges of tax evasion and conspiracy. Three other men – Washington defense contractor Mitchell Wade, businessman Thomas Kontogiannis and financier John T. Michael, both of New York – also have been identified as co-conspirators.

    Wilkes’ story shows how gifts, favors and campaign contributions can be used to gain lucrative business from the government.

    Over the past 20 years, Wilkes has devoted much of his career to developing political contacts in Washington. He and his associates have spent at least $600,000 on political contributions and $1.1 million on lobbying beyond the gifts mentioned in the Cunningham plea agreement, as they cultivated such politicians as House Majority Leader Tom DeLay and Appropriations Committee Chairman Jerry Lewis.

    And since 1996, he has received at least $95 million in government contracts for the small family of firms based in his $11 million headquarters in Poway, including ADCS Inc. and Group W.

    Brent Wilkes, founder of ADCS Inc., is identified by officials as “co-conspirator No. 1″ in the Randy “Duke” Cunningham bribery case.
    Those who know Wilkes describe him as gregarious and ambitious, a person who can make friends easily and toss them aside just as quickly.

    Born in San Diego County in 1954, Wilkes graduated from Hilltop High School in 1972, along with his football teammate and best friend Kyle Dustin “Dusty” Foggo, currently third-in-command at the Central Intelligence Agency. Wilkes and Foggo were roommates at San Diego State University, were best men at each other’s weddings and named their sons after each other.

    Wilkes’ career in political relations dates to the early 1980s, shortly after Foggo joined the CIA. Foggo was sent to Honduras to work with the Contra rebels who were trying to topple the Sandinista government of Nicaragua, according to sources within the CIA.

    Making connections
    Wilkes had moved to Washington, D.C., and opened a business named World Finance Corp. about three blocks away from the White House. One of his chief activities, sources say, was to accompany congressmen – including then-Rep. Bill Lowery of San Diego, whom Wilkes met during his participation in the SDSU Young Republicans organization – to Central America to meet with Foggo and Contra leaders.

    A number of sources who have had business dealings with Wilkes say he hinted at that time and afterward that he was affiliated with the CIA. CIA sources say he was never employed by the agency.

    By the time Wilkes returned to San Diego in the late 1980s, he had established relationships with members of the House Armed Services, Intelligence and Appropriations committees.

    Neither Wilkes, Foggo nor Lowery responded to requests for comment.

    By 1990, Wilkes was working for Aimco Financial Management in La Jolla. His chief duty was to bring in politicians, including Lowery, to talk to Aimco clients about how new laws might affect their finances.

    Aimco ran into trouble after securities regulators accused its founder, Marvin I. Friedman, of taking $268,000 of a client’s funds in 1991.

    Wilkes left Aimco in 1992 to take a job as a political consultant for Audre Inc., a Rancho Bernardo firm that specialized in automated document conversion systems, which converted maps and engineering drawings into a format that could be edited via computer.

    Audre, which was nearly bankrupt at the time, was eager to get more federal contracts. Shortly after Wilkes’ arrival, the 35-person firm, headed by San Diego businessman Tom Casey, began donating thousands of dollars to key members of Congress.

    “Wilkes was a political operator,” said former Audre engineer Dirk Holland. “He was pretty slick. He knew how to grease the wheels.”

    Said a former business associate of Wilkes: “He knew that it pays to get a sponsor. He knew that’s the way the game is played, and he convinced Tom Casey that that’s what it’s all about.”

    Union-Tribune file photo
    Congressmen Duncan Hunter (left) and Randy “Duke” Cunningham, shown here before a base-closure commission hearing in June 1991, have received thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from various defense firms.
    Between 1992 and 1997, Audre employees and family members donated $77,000 to members of Congress. Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-El Cajon, who got $7,250, and Cunningham, who got $5,050, became prominent backers of automated document systems in Congress.

    “Our job as San Diego congressmen is to do our best to make sure our guys get a fair shot,” Hunter said recently. “And Brent Wilkes and Tom Casey were aggressive and enthusiastic promoters of a breakthrough technology.”

    Audre was able to increase its influence by teaming up with Evergreen Information Technologies, a Colorado company that specialized in computerizing federal contract information.

    Casey had been one of the founders of Evergreen in the early 1990s and served on its board of directors. Evergreen gave $22,000 in political donations, often targeting the same politicians on the same dates as Audre.

    According to charges filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, $20,000 of Evergreen’s donations were illegal. Evergreen Chief Executive Barry Nelsen asked staffers to write $1,000 checks, leaving the “payee” line blank, according to SEC documents. Nelsen then gave the checks to lawmakers and repaid his workers in violation of federal law, the SEC charged in 1993.

    Nelsen did not fight the charges and was fined $65,000. He says he made the donations – none of which went to Hunter or Cunningham – so Congress would push the Navy to work with his firm.

    Getting noticed
    “I went to Tom Casey and said, ‘How do we get some money or political heat or something to make the Navy do what they should do?’ ” Nelsen said. “So up pops Brent Wilkes.”

    Nelsen said Wilkes identified which politicians should be given donations.

    The lobbying by Audre, as well as that of other software companies, was effective. Congress created an automated document conversion program, which provided $190 million in contracts between 1993 and 2001.

    Audre won more than $12.5 million of those contracts, largely provided through earmarks that let legislators add pet projects to the budget.

    “An earmark is usually devoted to a particular company or particular project that is tied to a particular congressman,” said Michael Surrusco, director of ethics campaigns at Common Cause, a government watchdog group.

    Earmarks are typically added to budget bills after they have been passed by the Senate and the House and the differing versions are being resolved in a conference committee. Because those meeting occur outside public view, the earmarks can be a way of avoiding scrutiny or accountability.

    The earmarks were included in the budget even though the Pentagon never asked for funds for automated document conversion. In 1994, the General Accounting Office, now known as the Government Accountability Office, which monitors federal spending, found that the military did not need automated systems because it already had its own systems to digitize documents.

    That did not dissuade Audre’s supporters in Congress.

    Union-Tribune file photo
    Tom Casey, founder of Audre Inc., a business that specialized in automated document conversion systems, hired Brent Wilkes in 1992 as a political consultant for the company.
    “I operate under the idea that not all good ideas come out of the Pentagon,” Hunter said.

    Two dozen firms vied for funding from the automated document conversion program. Their success depended on lobbying influential legislators, said Richard Gehling, who headed Audre’s federal sales in the late 1990s.

    Once Congress has appropriated money for programs, Pentagon officials decide how to apportion the money among prequalified contractors. These officials are very mindful of the desires of members of Congress who were crucial in funding the program, contractors and program managers said.

    Gehling described Audre’s technique for obtaining government contracts during a deposition in a lawsuit he filed in 2000 to gain back pay from the company.

    A successful sale to the military, he maintained, “normally boiled down to who the House or Senate member was and how much pressure they put on the undersecretary (of Defense) about getting the funding for their constituents.”

    Audre attorney Ian Kessler asked: “That, in turn, depends upon how much political muscle, how much influence (a company has) with a particular congressperson?”

    Gehling: “The majority of the time, it’s (whichever company) has the most clout.”

    Kessler: “You mean the most political clout?”

    Gehling: “Who’s paid more.”

    Kessler: “Paid more in terms of political contributions?”

    Gehling: “Fundraisers. Sponsoring.”

    To build more political backing for Audre, Wilkes asked Casey in 1994 to budget at least $40,000 a month for lobbying, far beyond what the money-losing company had been spending, according to two sources at the company.

    When Casey balked, Wilkes quit the firm. Six months later, Wilkes launched ADCS Inc., customizing a German system called VPMax to compete for contracts to convert government documents. It was a family affair. Most of the company’s top executives were related to Wilkes or his wife, Regina.

    The Pentagon rated VPMax as faster, easier and cheaper than Audre. VPMax cost $6,035 per unit, compared with $11,479 for Audre’s PC system and $29,950 for its Unix system.

    Even so, Hunter backed Audre, partly because it was a U.S.-made product.

    “I did oppose having a German firm get the business,” he said recently, although the German creator of VPMax was getting little more than licensing fees for the ADCS project.

    Casey played on that sentiment. When talking to Hunter about ADCS, Casey called it “the German software.” Hunter, in turn, asked Maj. Gen. John Phillips, the Pentagon’s chief purchasing officer, to “whenever possible, use [document conversion] products that are made in the United States by American taxpayers.”

    In May 1995, just as Wilkes was launching ADCS, Hunter – who had just been named chairman of the Armed Services Committee – let Audre use his office for two weeks to demonstrate its newest release to Pentagon officials.

    Two weeks after the demonstrations ended, Audre sold $1.2 million of the software to the military for testing.

    1972 yearbook photo
    Kyle Dustin “Dusty” Foggo (top), now the CIA’s executive director, was a friend of Brent Wilkes’ at Hilltop High School in Chula Vista.
    “When you’re in a position like Hunter was, you have a lot of clout, and we’re not supposed to rock the boat,” said a former Pentagon procurement official who declined to be named.

    At that point, Wilkes started donating money to Cunningham, who sat on a House Appropriations subcommittee overseeing the Pentagon budget. Since October 1995, he and his associates have given $71,500 to Cunningham’s campaign and political action committee. Cunningham became an ADCS booster.

    “The success achieved by ADCS Inc. is an asset to the San Diego business and technological communities,” Cunningham said in a 1997 endorsement that was printed in ADCS’ pamphlets and press releases. He predicted VPMax would lead to “a stronger, more efficient national defense.”

    In 1996, Casey pressed Hunter to find out why the military was not buying more of Audre’s software. Hunter demanded a Pentagon investigation.

    A report from the Pentagon’s Inspector General responded that “little demand exists” for automated document conversion systems. Aside from a Navy base in Ventura County, Port Hueneme, no military installation said it needed the systems. Much of the software Congress had funded was languishing in storage.

    Such criticism did not dissuade Hunter.

    According to Gehling’s deposition, Hunter pushed the military to buy $2.5 million in Audre software in February 1997.

    “There were still problems with the software,” Gehling said. “It’s always been flaky. It’s still flaky.”

    Under pressure from Cunningham, the Pentagon shifted the money from Audre to ADCS. At the time, Cunningham said he only wanted the military to pick the best contractor possible. Donald Lundell, who was then Audre’s chief executive, accused Cunningham of being swayed by Wilkes’ campaign contributions.

    At the time, Cunningham rejected any criticism of his actions.

    “I’m on the side of the angels here,” he said then, adding that anyone who questioned his role “can just go to hell.”

    Questionable projects
    By then, the document conversion program was drawing fire from Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain, who included it on a list of $5.5 billion “objectionable” earmarks that Congress had tacked onto the military budget.

    In July 1997, McCain accused the Senate Armed Services Committee and the House National Security Committee, where both Hunter and Cunningham sat, of “virtually ignoring the request of the Pentagon and impeding the military’s ability to channel resources where they are most needed.”

    McCain said that “with military training exercises continuing to be cut, backlogs in aircraft and ship maintenance, flying hour shortfalls, military health care underfunded by $600 million, and 11,787 service members reportedly on food stamps,” Congress should not be funding “a plethora of programs not requested by the Defense Department.”

    McCain was largely ignored. Three months later, Congress earmarked $20 million for document conversion systems. The earmarks hit $25 million the next year, including ADCS’ biggest project: a $9.7 million contract to digitize documents in the Panama Canal Zone, which was to be handed to Panama in 1999.

    Advertisement
    The idea for the project came about at a time that Hunter and Cunningham were both warning that the People’s Republic of China might try to take over Panama once U.S. forces left. The project was based on the idea that the U.S. should have blueprints of public buildings in Panama in case of a Chinese takeover.

    Wilkes began lobbying for the project in early 1998, targeting Rep. Robert Livingston of Louisiana, who chaired the Appropriations Committee, and Rep. Jerry Lewis of Redlands and Cunningham, who served on the subcommittee on defense.

    As the Appropriations Committee earmarked the budget, Wilkes, his wife Regina, Wilkes’ nephew and lobbyist Joel Combs, attorney Richard Bliss and Rollie Kimbrough, a Democrat who headed a Washington, D.C., company that partnered with ADCS on the project, contributed a total of $28,000 to the three Republican lawmakers.

    The project passed without the Pentagon’s support, since most of the documents in Panama had little military value. Many of the documents that were of military value already were being photocopied, faxed or scanned into computers.

    But Wilkes got a contract to convert millions of documents into computer-readable format, including reams of papers that dated to the administration of President Theodore Roosevelt. By Wilkes’ own description, ADCS was using its most expensive technology to scan engineering drawings from the 1870s and images of boats from the 1910s.

    Louis Kratz, an assistant undersecretary of defense, tried to block funding for the project, arguing there were more pressing needs at the Army’s Missile Command, the Air Force’s Logistics Center and an Air Force Pacific Base project.

    Kratz was rebuffed by Cunningham as well as Hunter, who wanted the Pentagon to give Audre a $3.9 million contract to perform document conversion on an Abrams tank project.

    Kratz later told The Washington Post that he had never encountered such “arrogance” and “meddling” as he had from Cunningham and Wilkes. John Karpovich, who helped run the document conversion program at the Defense Department before his retirement, said Wilkes infuriated Pentagon staff by claiming that the document conversion money belonged to him.

    “Brent came in and said, ‘That’s our money,’ ” Karpovich recalled. “He said, ‘The congressmen put the money in there for us.’ “

    Kratz eventually freed the funds, delaying the Air Force and Missile Command projects. But he also asked the Inspector General to investigate how the projects got funding.

    In June 2000, the Pentagon Inspector General reported that several important projects had lost funding because “two congressmen” pressured defense officials to shift the money to the Panama and Abrams tank projects. The shift in funding was causing some military officers to “lose confidence in the fairness of the selection process,” the Inspector General reported.

    Lavish living
    The money from Panama and other ADCS contracts – ranging from Gateway computer systems to military sound technology – helped fund a heady lifestyle for Wilkes and his associates.

    In 1999, Wilkes and his wife bought a $1.5 million home in the Poway hills. He soon bought a second home: a $283,500 town house in the Virginia suburbs near Washington, D.C. During his visits to Washington, he made his rounds in a chauffeur-driven Mercedes. At the Capital Grille, a favored hangout of legislators and lobbyists, he rented a personalized wine locker with his best friend Foggo.

    Wilkes spread his taxpayer-provided funds throughout his company, taking executives on periodic retreats to Hawaii and Idaho.

    In Honolulu, Wilkes stayed at suites at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel or rented the beachfront mansion of the late hairstyling mogul Paul Mitchell, which typically goes for $50,000 a week.

    In Idaho, Wilkes’ team stayed at the posh Coeur d’Alene Resort, where Wilkes paid $2,500 a night for a 2,500-square-foot penthouse suite, featuring an indoor swimming pool and outdoor Jacuzzi, said former employees and sources in Idaho.

    For dinner, Wilkes would take his team to Beverley’s restaurant, where a group meal could easily cost several thousand dollars. For recreation, they would fish, Jet Ski or play at the resort’s exclusive golf course, famed for its 14th hole on a man-made floating island in Lake Coeur d’Alene.

    There were retreats to Hawaii and Idaho at least once a year, said one source inside the company, with visits to Idaho typically occurring in spring or summer and visits to Hawaii in fall or winter.

    Wilkes made no bones about where his money was coming from. His jet-black Hummer bore a license plate reading MIPR ME – a reference to Military Interdepartmental Purchase Requests, which authorize funds in the Pentagon.

    Wilkes shared the benefits of his largesse with the politicians who helped him. He took Cunningham on several out-of-state trips on his corporate jet. Cunningham has produced no records showing that he paid for food, lodging or transportation while traveling to resorts with Wilkes, although he does have receipts for several campaign trips on Wilkes’ jet.

    Wilkes also bought a small powerboat that he moored behind Cunningham’s yacht, the Kelly C, at the Capital Yacht Club in Washington, D.C. The boat was available for Cunningham’s use anytime Wilkes was not using it.

    But what landed Wilkes in trouble with federal prosecutors was his gifts to Cunningham. According to Cunningham’s plea agreement, “Co-conspirator No. 1,” gave $525,000 to Cunningham on May 13, 2004, to pay off the second mortgage on Cunningham’s home in Rancho Santa Fe.

    Co-conspirator No. 1 also gave $100,000 to Cunningham on May 1, 2000, which went into Cunningham’s personal accounts in San Diego and Washington, D.C. And he paid $11,116.50 to help pay Cunningham’s mortgage on the Kelly C.

    The plea agreement charged that in return for the payments, Cunningham “used his public office and took other official action to influence U.S. Department of Defense personnel to award and execute government contracts.”

    Wilkes befriended other legislators, too. He ran a hospitality suite, with several bedrooms, in Washington – first in the Watergate Hotel and then in the Westin Grand near Capitol Hill.

    He also kept his donations flowing, targeting people with clout over the Pentagon budget: $43,000 to Jerry Lewis, who now heads the Appropriations Committee; $35,500 to Hunter, who heads the Armed Services Committee; and $30,000 to Tom DeLay, who flew on Wilkes’ jet several times and has been a frequent golfing buddy.

    Over the past three years, Wilkes’ lobbying group in Washington – Group W Advisors – also paid about $630,000 in lobbying fees to Alexander Strategy Group, a firm headed by DeLay’s former chief of staff Ed Buckham and staffed with former DeLay employees.

    The firm has a well-publicized reputation in Washington as a conduit to DeLay’s office.

    “The Alexander lobbyists’ sales pitch was, ‘Either you hire me or DeLay is going to screw you,’ ” an anonymous source identified as a top Republican lobbyist told the Congressional Quarterly weekly last month. “It was not really a soft sell.”

  3. Leen says:

    How hard is it on “spy pimps” if a thug like Foggo gets away with such a light sentence in proportion to the list of crimes that he allegedly committed? This is just one more example that there are several Justice systems in this country. One for the well connected and powerful, one for the middle class, and one for the poor.

    Hell I know people who are in prison for non violent crimes (growing marijuana, mandatory sentencing)and thugs like Foggo will do how much time? There are so many examples of very serious criminals who are out walking after committing treasonous crimes. Libby and the rest of the Bush traitors who outed Plame and undermined national security, Douglas Feith, Rove, Judy Miller. I am sickened by this lack of justice and how absolutely corrupt our justice system continues to be.

    There is no need to wonder why the peasants have absolutely no respect for this system.

  4. Citizen92 says:

    Let’s not forget that while Dusty was running the CIA station in Honduras in the 80’s, John Negroponte was the US’s Ambassador there.

    Ambassadors and station chiefs work closely – and there isn’t any doubt that Negroponte and Foggo have history.

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/…..Mar20.html

  5. Mary says:

    Yep, it’s all about the CYA for CIA and their et als, not really greymail. If Bush and the CIA had had their way, this never would have happened. Carol Lam left this legacy all on her own and it collapsed without her. She was in a different league than Mukasey and predecessors.

    You are so right about the threats to national security. “There were tried and true ways to legally deal with Foggo and his treasonous threats. ” Yep – I seem to recall a recent case, where they disappeared a guy who eventually was tracked down to being held in a military brig. A few years of their “legal” detention and “questioning” and he ended up a nice, pliable defendant in the later criminal case – all of it perfectly legal.

    • bmaz says:

      Yeah, I just don’t get how easily this has been written off and consigned to the dustheap. The cover of the election and the financial crisis is obscuring a lot of Cheney style cleanup, and this is a prime example. There is no way this needed to go down this way to protect anything; that is a sham. This has been a nice little synchronized swim that has clouded a lot of water; water that is now going under the bridge and out of sight.

      I wonder what Cunningham and Wilkes think of this?

  6. timbo says:

    What is Foggo talking about to get such a light sentence? That’s what has to be going on…otherwise, it is obstruction on the part of prosecutors…

    • bmaz says:

      I can find no evidence of cooperation. If it is there, they are sure keeping it under wraps. The limited and restricted facts used in the plea lead me to believe there is no cooperation agreement; but who knows.