Feinstein’s Homework Assignments
While Devin Nunes has been getting all the headlines for trying to muck up the Mueller investigation, Chuck Grassley and Dianne Feinstein are increasingly at odds, as well. First there was the Grassley-Lindsey Graham bogus referral of Christopher Steele (I say it’s bogus not because I doubt his sworn statements have been inconsistent — they have been — but because FBI doesn’t need a referral for statements made to FBI itself). Then Feinstein released, and then apologized for, releasing the Glenn Simpson transcript. Grassley used that to invent the story that Jared Kushner was spooked and so wouldn’t sit for an interview with the Senate Judiciary Committee (we know that’s bullshit because Kushner released his own statement before giving it to the Senate Intelligence Committee, which “spooked” Richard Burr). Still, in response to a Sheldon Whitehouse and Richard Blumenthal request that Don Jr’s transcript be shared with FBI (because he likely lied in it), Grassley suggested he’d release the transcripts of all the interviews pertaining to the June 9 meeting.
So now both are continuing to collect evidence on their own, at least in part to generate headlines rather than investigative leads. But the most recent requests, both sent out yesterday, provide some insight into what they believe might have happened and what they know (or still don’t know).
In this post, I’ll look at whom Feinstein is requesting information from. In a follow-up I’ll comment on Grassley’s latest request.
Who Feinstein wants to talk to and who represents them
Some of Feinstein’s requests are immediately understandable, including the following people (thoughout this post, I’ve noted the lawyer’s name if the letter was sent to one):
- Steve Bannon (sent care of William Burck)
- Mark Corallo (apparently addressed to him personally, even though Victoria Toensing and Joseph diGenova are reportedly representing him)
- Corey Lewandowski (Peter Chavkin)
- Don McGahn (addressed to William Burck — compare with Bannon’s letter)
- Stephen Miller (addressed to him at the White House)
- Sergei Millian (sent via email to him directly; see this post for context)
- Sean Spicer (Christopher Mead)
As for the others, the explanation for why the Committee is seeking information explains any connection understood to the investigation. Most of this is open source information to footnoted reporting (click through to see those sources). Where that’s not the case, I’ve bolded it, as that presumably reflects still classified information the Committee received.
Michael Caputo (Dennis Vacco):
You joined the presidential campaign of Donald Trump as a communications advisor upon the recommendation of Paul Manafort, and it has been reported you have close ties to campaign advisor Roger Stone. It also has been reported that you have deep ties to Russia, including having worked for the Kremlin and Russian energy conglomerate Gazprom.
Paul Erickson (sent to him directly):
In May 2016, you were involved in efforts to broker a meeting between Alexander Torshin — someone you described as “President Putin’s emissary” — and top officials for the Trump campaign. In your communications with the Trump campaign about this meeting, you said that you had been “cultivating a back-channel to President Putin’s Kremlin” and that the “Kremlin believes htat the only possibility of a true reset in this relationship would be with a new Republican White House.”
Robert Foresman (sent to him directly):
As a long-time investment banker in Russia, you have developed relationships with senior Kremlin officials and have expressed your passion for private diplomacy to help foster improved U.S.-Russia relations. The Committee has reason to believe you sought to engage the Trump campaign in discussions concerning outreach from senior Kremlin officials.
Rhona Graff (Alan Futerfas, who is also representing Don Jr):
As a senior vice president in the Trump Organization and longtime assistant to Donald Trump, you are likely familiar with the President’s communications and schedule, particularly during the 2016 presidential campaign. For example, Roger Stone and Paul Manafort, [sic] have said they contact you to get access to President Trump. And when Rob Goldstone emailed Donald Trump Jr. about setting up the June 9, 2016 meeting between the Trump campaign and a Russian lawyer, he noted, “I can also send this info to your father via Rhona, but it is ultra sensitive so wanted to send to you first.”
Philip Griffin (sent directly to his email):
You have been a longstanding associate of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort and served, reportedly at his request, as an advisor to the Trump campaign during the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July 2016.
You have been a longtime of [sic] associate of Manafort, and you hired Konstantin Kiliminik [sic] to work with you and Manafort in Ukraine. In 2014, you were named in a lawsuit filed by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska as a “ley” partner, along with Manafort, Gates, and Kilimnik, in an investment fund that Deripaska contends stole nearly $19 million from him. In 2016, while Manafort was serving as the Trump campaign manager, Kilimnik reportedly emailed Manafort about reporting on Manafort’s role in the campaign with Deripaska, which Manafort suggested might be used to “get whole.”
David Keene (sent directly to him):
In spring 2016, Russian banker Alexander Torshin and Russian national Maria Butina were reportedly involved in efforts to arrange a meeting between Mr. Torshin and then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign. Mr. Torshin is a “senior Russian official who claimed to be acting at the behest of President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia.” Ms. Butina is the founder of the Russian group known as the Right to Bear Arms and has described herself as a “representative of the Russian Federation” and a “connection between Team Trump and Russia.” You reportedly were introduced to Mr. Torshin in 2011, and were invited by Mr. Torshin and Ms. Butina to speak at the 2013 annual meeting in Moscow for the Right to Bear Arms. Ms. Butina was your guest at the NRA’s 2014 annual meeting, and you traveled along with Trump campaign surrogate Sheriff David Clarke to Moscow in December 2015 for another meeting with Ms. Butina’s organization.
Joseph Keith Kellogg, Jr. (sent directly to him):
As a member of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy team, you worked alongside George Papadopoulos and Carter Page, both of whom had multiple contacts with Russian officials (or their surrogates) that they reported back to the campaign. You also worked on the Trump transition team before joining the National Security Council and served as Chief of Staff under Lt. General Michael Flynn until his removal.
You served as Chief of Staff on the National Security Council during the period when General Flynn lied to administration officials about his Russian contacts. It has been reported that, once the White House learned of those lies from Acting Attorney General Sally Yates, you started participating in the President’s daily security briefings, and — once General Flynn was removed — you served as the President’s interim national security advisor.
John Mashburn (sent to him at the White House):
As the Trump campaign policy director, you worked alongside members of the foreign policy team who had multiple contacts with Russian officials (or their surrogates). For example, Rick Dearborn, another senior policy aide, who reportedly shared a May 2016 request from Alexander Torshin, a senior Russian official with close ties to Vladimir Putin, to meet then-candidate Trump or other top campaign officials at the National Rifle Association’s 2016 annual convention. It also has been reported that JD Gordon informed you about pro-Russian changes to the Republican party platform that were championed by the Trump campaign. You role as senior advisor on the transition team, and now White House Deputy Cabinet Secretary, also has given you a firsthand look at other significant events affecting the Trump administration, including the removals of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn and FBI Director James Comey.
Frank Mermoud (sent via email directly to him):
You served as an advisor to the Trump campaign during the Republican National Convention in Cleveland in July 2016, running the program for ambassadors and foreign delegations — a post that you reportedly held at the recommendation of former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort. Because of your role at the convention, longstanding relationship with Mr. Manafort, and deep business ties to Ukraine,
Amanda Miller (Alan Futerfas, who also represents Don Jr):
As a vice president for marketing at the Trump Organization, you are likely intimately familiar with President Donald Trump and the inner workings of the Trump Organization. For example, you have made public statements on behalf of the Trump Organization regarding the Trump Organization’s efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow. In addition, the Committee has reason to believe that you may have information on other Trump business ties to Russia.
Feinstein wants to know who lied to David Ignatius
In general, the items requested are not the surprising. I am, however, interested that Kellogg, Miller, and Spicer were asked about,
All communications concerning the story written by David Ignatius that appeared in the Washington Post on January 12, 2017, titled, “Why did Obama dawdle on Russia’s hacking?“
Note, before the story, the transition team did not comment, but after it revealed that Flynn had phoned Sergei Kislyak several times on December 29, two aides called Ignatius and told what we now know are lies.
The Trump transition team did not respond Thursday night to a request for comment. But two team members called with information Friday morning. A first Trump official confirmed that Flynn had spoken with Kislyak by phone, but said the calls were before sanctions were announced and didn’t cover that topic. This official later added that Flynn’s initial call was to express condolences to Kislyak after the terrorist killing of the Russian ambassador to Ankara Dec. 19, and that Flynn made a second call Dec. 28 to express condolences for the shoot-down of a Russian plane carrying a choir to Syria. In that second call, Flynn also discussed plans for a Trump-Putin conversation sometime after the inauguration. In addition, a second Trump official said the Dec. 28 call included an invitation from Kislyak for a Trump administration official to visit Kazakhstan for a conference in late January.
Burck’s clients get different treatment
Also as I noted above, Feinstein staff treated the letter to the two William Burck clients differently. Bannon’s was sent to him, but care of Burck.
But McGahn’s was addressed to Burck.
Unless I missed it, McGahn’s is the only letter treated this way. Which is one reason I suspect the blizzard of stories about what a hero McGahn was in June after he had done clearly obstructive things in May and earlier may have more to do with McGahn’s legal jeopardy than Trump’s.
Update: This Politico piece (h/t PINC) says that McGahn hired Burck last May, right after he had done some really stupid things with respect to the Jim Comey firing.
McGahn came calling in May amid the fallout from Trump’s decision to fire Comey from his post as FBI director — an explosive move that prompted Mueller’s appointment.
Just a thought – is it also possible that McGahn’s letter was treated that way to make clear that the request was being made to him personally and not the office of the White House Counsel?
The Foresman note is very interesting.
It seems more and more than McGahn has flipped. The quotes about him being “fed up” scream “I didn’t want to do this and I’m trying to make myself look better!”
Or I don’t want to do this anymore and I’m scared about my liability for what I’ve already done. That’s a state of mind that helps a prosecutor flip a lower level target and persuade him to testify against a higher level target.
That is what I really meant to convey. McGahn hiring his lawyer in May, then the lawyer getting Prebius and Bannon, seems like a nice stable of low-integrity, cover their own ass, flippable men.
If McGahn is worried about his own liability, which after consuming Marcy’s writing and guest podcasts seems like a VERY real possibility, him (or his lawyer) leaking all those stories seems like an attempt to sway public opinion.
All of this raises the question – why hasn’t he withdrawn as counsel already.
If all of this is correct then he has interests adverse to client and has to withdraw. Unless, in some perverted logic the client is the oval and not Trump and therefore he is staying on for some “noble” reason that will stand up once the rationale is opebn for criticism.
This is great reporting. I missed Marcy’s podcast appearances from this week, I will go over her twitter to find some links.
Nice research and analysis.
This list of questions and people would communicate equally well to the people and the administration what the committee thinks the FBI knows or might be interested in, as well as what it thinks the FBI doesn’t know. The latter seems questionable, though, in that Mueller’s team probably knows a fair bit more than the committee. It has been pursuing an investigation rather than delaying one.
I’m also interested in the people DiFi didn’t send letters to but that I don’t believe have testified to SJC. One that comes to mind (largely because Corallo’s letter wasn’t sent to Toensing) is Sam Clovis, who is repped by Toensing.
Why do you think that is?
Let’s also remember Rudy and the NYC Feebs, a good summary is here:
Per a comment in the dailyKOS, note that Devlin Barrett has moved on from channeling TeamTrump at the WSJ to the Washington Post. Just a reminder of the long history the US has of captured media. Not much written about Guiliani dropping prosecuting Trump after that campaign donation. Same goes for the Wall Street, oligarch and K street crime wave.
FWIW, Devlin is not only a very good reporter, but a very decent chap to boot.
Disinformation by omission. What didn’t such a good guy connect the dots? I don’t know, maybe he did. His name has been on my radar for awhile.
If this were Nixon or Cheney, first we’d see a WH press release that McGahn has “resigned, then an office of the AG release that Rosenstein has “resigned”.
This is just a note re Senator Feinstein.
To any truly progressive or liberal observer, this Californian has been a substantial embarrassment, staunchly protecting and championing, as she has, all massive spying programs on American and other citizens.
Her praiseworthy personal release of material Chairman Nunes and other Republicans intended to conceal may well have been motivated by conviction and patriotism, but it should be borne in mind that Senator Feinstein is up for re-election this November and she is too politically astute not to have felt the progressive political/social/anti-Trump wave that now is sweeping her home state fed by many who are well aware of her overall record.
100%, which is why I view her unilaterally releasing the Simpson testimony as a pure political move. And Trump have her a HUGE gift when he gave her a nickname.