Posts

Three different witnesses have, after interviews with Andrew DeFilippis, claimed to have a memory that conflicts with the documentary record with regards to whether the FBI believed that the white paper Michael Sussmann brought was prepared by the DNC.

A repository of materials from the Michael Sussmann trial related to technical issues.

John Durham accused Michael Sussmann about lying to hide why he shared allegations about Presidential candidate Donald Trump. But formally, at least, the FBI didn't consider these allegations to be about Trump, they considered them to be about (now sanctioned) Alfa Bank.

Michael Sussmann's key exhibit proving that even if he lied it couldn't be material is a tweet that Jim Baker sent just after Trump promised to solicit foreign help getting elected again in 2019.

Durham lawyer Brittain Shaw's bid to keep Eric Lichtblau off the stand makes sense from a person in the grip of a fevered conspiracy theory. It doesn't accord with a professional who has obligations to protect the privilege of others.

In April, John Durham provided evidence he was going to lie about what time on October 5, 2016 key emails involving Fusion GPS were sent. Yesterday, he appears to have done just that.

Reporters are stating, as fact, that it is unusual for DOJ to request for help from a congressional investigation that has (overtly at least) gotten a head start. That's a major misreading of what happened in the Mueller investigation.

DOJ superseded Tom Barrack's indictment, adding language about how he tried to "harvest assets" from his ability to direct policy in the Trump Administration.

The existing witness list in the Durham case suggests he may want to avoid talking about the Alfa Bank anomaly at the heart of this case entirely.

Here is the Sussmann indictment as filed by Durham. It is an absurd 27 pages long. I could have written it in 2-3 pages, including signature page. As you can see, excepting all the run on horse manure Durham penned, the indictment is for…